Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 276–296 | Cite as

Urban Livelihoods in Slums of Chennai: Developing a Relational Understanding

  • Tara Saharan
  • Karin Pfeffer
  • Isa Baud
Original Article
  • 100 Downloads

Abstract

As South Asia urbanizes, urban poverty is becoming more important in the development agenda. Many slums in India have existed for decades, despite multiple policies and programmes for reducing urban poverty. This article reveals the diversity of slums as outcomes linked to their internal development and their relations to the city’s macro-economic policies and institutional landscape. The focus is on the way these relations shape opportunities and constraints of households’ livelihoods over time in two slum settlements of Chennai. The research uses mixed methods to show how outcomes for households are closely linked to the settlement history, institutions and city region of which they are a part of. The article argues that slum development models and policies should promote relational understandings of slum areas to influence policies towards more effective support for reducing poverty among residents.

Keywords

Chennai slums urban livelihoods relational historical 

Alors que l’Asie du Sud s’urbanise, la pauvreté urbaine devient plus importante dans le programme de développement. De nombreux bidonvilles existent depuis des décennies en Inde, malgré des multiples politiques et programmes visant à réduire cette pauvreté. Cet article révèle la diversité des bidonvilles comme résultant de leur développement interne, et de leurs relations avec les politiques macroéconomiques et les paysages institutionnels des villes où elles sont situées. L’accent est mis sur la façon dont ces relations forment des opportunités et des contraintes pour les ménages, influençant leurs moyens de subsistance au fil du temps, dans deux bidonvilles à Chennai. La recherche utilise des méthodes mixtes pour montrer comment les issus des ménages sont étroitement liés à l’histoire du peuplement, aux institutions et à la région de la ville à laquelle ils appartiennent. L’article démontre que les modèles et politiques pour le développement des bidonvilles devraient favoriser la compréhension relationnelle de ces zones, afin d’influencer les politiques en faveur d’un soutien plus efficace dans la réduction de la pauvreté chez les résidents.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out in the context of the EU-FP7 project Chance2Sustain: Urban Chances, City Growth and the Sustainability Challenge (Project no. 244828), with EADI as the lead partner of the project. We are thankful to our research assistants for the fieldwork and Tofin for the pictures. We are grateful to Hebe Verrest, Linnet Taylor and Nicky Pouw for their inputs on the earlier drafts of this article as well as the reviewers for the thorough reviews. We also thank all the respondents for their valuable time especially the residents of Anna Nagar and Kamaraj Nagar.

References

  1. Amis, P. (2001) Rethinking UK aid in urban India: Reflections on an impact assessment study of slum improvement projects. Environment and Urbanization 13(1):101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arabindoo, P. (2009) Falling apart at the margins? Neighborhood transformations in peri‐Urban Chennai. Development and Change 40(5): 879–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baud, I. S. A., and Nainan, N. (2008) “Negotiated spaces” for representation in Mumbai: Ward committees, advanced locality management and the politics of middle-class activism. Environment and Urbanization 20(2): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benjamin, S. (2008) Occupancy urbanism: Radicalizing politics and economy beyond policy and programs. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32(3): 719–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhan, G., and Jana, A. (2013) Of slums or poverty - notes of caution from census 2011. Economic and Political Weekly 48(18): 13–16.Google Scholar
  6. Chatterjee, P. (2004) The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chimhowu, A., and Hulme, D. (2006) Livelihood dynamics in planned and spontaneous resettlement in Zimbabwe: Converging and Vulnerable. World Development 34(4): 728–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coelho, K., Venkat, T., and Chandrika, R. (2012) The spatial reproduction of urban poverty. labour and livelihoods in a slum resettlement colony Economic and Political Weekly 47(48): 55–63.Google Scholar
  9. Cornwall, A., and Gaventa, J. (2001) Bridging the gap: citizenship, participation and accountability. PLA Notes 40: 32–35.Google Scholar
  10. Darashaw. (2014) Slum Free City plan of ActionChennai City Corporation. (Draft report). Chennai.Google Scholar
  11. Dupont, V. (2008) Slum demolitions in Delhi since the 1990s: An appraisal. Economic and Political Weekly 43(28):79–87.Google Scholar
  12. Dupont, V. (2011) The dream of Delhi as a Global city. International Journal Of Urban And Regional Research 35(3): 533–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Economist Group. (1987) Survey of Slums in Madras Metropolitan Area. Madras: Economist Group.Google Scholar
  14. Gaventa, J. (2006) Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS bulletin 37(6): 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghertner, D. A. (2011) Rule by aesthetics: World-class city making in Delhi. In A. Roy and A. Ong (eds.) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 279-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gough, I., McGregor J. A. and Camfield, L. (2007) Theorising wellbeing in international development. In I. Gough and J. A. McGregor (eds.) Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Government of India (2013) Census of India 2011, Primary Census Abstract - Data Highlights TAMIL NADU Series 34. accessed on 20 December 2015, available at: http://www.census.tn.nic.in/PCA_data_highlights/chapter1_population_growth.pdf.
  18. Harriss, J. (2002) Depoliticizing Development: The World Bank and Social Capital. Delhi: Left Word Press.Google Scholar
  19. Housing and land Rights Network (2014) Forced to the Fringes: Disaster of ‘Resettlement’ in India. Report Two: Kannagi Nagar, Chennai: Housing and Land Rights Network.Google Scholar
  20. IN-RIMT and TCG (2005) Pre-feasibility study for Identification of Environmental Infrastructure Requirements in Slums of Chennai Metropolitan Area, Final ReportChennai Corporation Area, Volume I Main Report, Chennai.Google Scholar
  21. Jain, M., Knieling J. and Taubenböck H. (2015) Urban transformation in the national capital territory of Delhi, India: The emergence and growth of slums? Habitat International 48: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kennedy, L. Varrel, A. Denis, E. Dupont, V., R. Dhanalakshmi, Roumeau, S., Baud, I. S. A., Pfeffer, K., N. Sridharan, M. Vijayabaskar, M. S. Babu, Seifelislam, A., Rouanet, H. and Saharan, T. (2014) Chance to Sustain city report: Engaging with sustainability issues in metropolitan Chennai, Project Report. accessed on 15 July 2015, available at: http://www.chance2sustain.eu/fileadmin/Website/Dokumente/Dokumente/Publications/publications_2014/C2S_CR_No05_Chennai_City_Report__V2.pdf.
  23. Krishna, A. (2013) Stuck in place: Investigating social mobility in 14 Bangalore slums. The Journal of Development Studies 49(7): 1010–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krishna, A., Sriram, M. and Prakash, P. (2014) Slum types and adaptation strategies: Identifying policy-relevant differences in Bangalore. Environment and Urbanization 26(2): 568–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krishnamurthy, R. and Desouza, K. C. (2015) Chennai, India. Cities 42:118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kundu, A. (2014) Exclusionary growth, poverty and India’s emerging urban structure. Social Change 44(4): 541–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mahadevia, D. (2006) NURM and the poor in globalising mega cities. Economic and Political Weekly 41(31): 3399–3403.Google Scholar
  28. Martínez, J., Pfeffer, K. and Baud, I.S.A. (2016) Factors shaping cartographic representations of inequalities. Maps as products and processes. Habitat International 51: 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Massey, D. (2005) For Space. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. McFarlane, C. and Desai, R. (2015) Sites of entitlement: Claim, negotiation and struggle in Mumbai. Environment and Urbanization 27(2):441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McFarlane, C. Silver, J., and Truelove, Y. (2016) Cities within Cities: Intra-Urban comparison of infrastructure in Mumbai, Delhi and Cape Town. Urban Geography: 1–25.Google Scholar
  32. Meikle, S. (2002) The urban context and poor people. In C. Rakodi, and T. Lloyd-Jones (eds.) Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty. London: Earthscan, pp. 37–51.Google Scholar
  33. Mitra, A. (2010) Migration, livelihood and well-being: Evidence from Indian city slums. Urban Studies 47(7): 1371–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitra, A. (2012) Insights into Inclusive Growth, Employment and Wellbeing in India, New Delhi: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Moser, C. O. N. (1998) The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development 26(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moser, C. O. N. (2009) Ordinary families, extraordinary lives: Assets and poverty reduction in Guayaquil, 1978-2004. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nainan, N. (2012) Lakshmi Raj: Shaping spaces in post industrial Mumbai: Urban regimes, planning instruments and splintering communities. PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  38. Pouw, N. R. M. (2008) The characterization and monitoring of poverty. The case of smallholder farmers in Rural Uganda. PhD Thesis, VrijeUniversiteit, Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  39. Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A. and Rakodi C. (2009) The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization 21(2): 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pryer, J., Rogers, S. and Rahman, A. (2005) Work-disabling illness as a shock for livelihoods and poverty in Dhaka slums, Bangladesh. International Planning Studies 10(1): 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pugh, C. (1990) The world bank and housing policy in Madras. Journal of Urban Affairs 12(2): 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rakodi, C. (2002) A livelihoods approach – Conceptual issues and Definitions. In C. Rakodi and T. Lloyd-Jones (eds.) Urban Livelihoods: A People-Centred Approach to Reducing Poverty. London: Earthscan, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  43. Rakodi, C. (1999) A capital assets framework for analysing household livelihood strategies: Implications for policy. Development Policy Review 17(3): 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raman, N. (2011) The Board and the Bank: Changing policies towards slums in Chennai. Economic & Political Weekly 46(31): 74–80.Google Scholar
  45. Scoones, I. (2009) Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1): 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sengupta, U. (2010) The hindered self-help: Housing policies, politics and poverty in Kolkata, India. Habitat International 34(3): 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shatkin, G. (2014) Contesting the Indian city: Global visions and the politics of the local. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shaw, A. (2012) Metropolitan city growth and management in post-liberalized India. Eurasian Geography and Economics 53(1): 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Subbaraman, R., O’Brien, J., Shitole, T., Shitole, S., Sawant, K., Bloom, D. E. and Patil-Deshmukh, A. (2012) Off the map: The health and social implications of being a non-notified slum in India. Environment and Urbanization 24(2): 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Subramanian, N. (1999) Ethnicity and Populist Mobilization: Political Parties, Citizens and Democracy in South India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Sutherland, C., Jordhus-Lier, D., Braathen, E. and Dupont, V. (2016) Conclusion. In V. Dupont, D. Jordhus-Lier, C. Sutherland and E. Braathen (eds.) The Politics of Slums in the Global South - Urban Informality in Brazil, India, South Africa and Peru. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 210–222.Google Scholar
  52. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board (1975) Socio-economic Survey of Madras Slums, Report prepared for Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board, Chennai.Google Scholar
  53. UN-Habitat (2014) Practical Guide to Designing, Planning and Implementing Citywide Slum Upgrading Programs. accessed on 15 July 2015, available at: http://unhabitat.org/books/a-practical-guide-to-designing-planning-and-executing-citywide-slum-upgrading-programmes/.
  54. Ward, P. M. (2015) Housing rehab for consolidated informal settlements: A new policy agenda For 2016 Un-habitat III. Habitat International 50: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weinstein, L., & Ren, X. (2009) The changing right to the city: Urban renewal and housing rights in globalizing Shanghai and Mumbai. City & Community 8(4): 407–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wyatt, A. (2013) Combining clientelist and programmatic politics in Tamil Nadu, South India. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 51(1): 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zérah, M.H., Dupont V., Tawa Lama-Rewal S. and Chaudhuri, B. (2011) Introduction - right to the city and urban citizenship in the Indian Context. In Zérah, M.H., Dupont V., Tawa Lama-Rewal S. (eds) Urban Policies and the Right to the City in India: Rights, Responsibilities and Citizenship. New Delhi: UNESCO & Centre de Sciences Humaines, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Geography, Planning and InternationalUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations