On facing the crucial psychosocial and political-economic dimensions of anthropogenic global warming

Abstract

Anthropogenic global warming is one of the most significant existential threats facing the human species. Nonetheless, most individuals largely conduct their lives in a manner that does not fully acknowledge, let alone effectively deal with this threat. This field note argues that both a psychosocial and political-economic approach could offer more in-depth perspectives to understand anthropogenic global warming and potential avenues to investigate it moving forward. In so doing, it is argued that climate change policy recommendations, and associated political action, could benefit from taking into account the dimension of our psyches on an individual and collective level, as well as the political-economic context of anthropogenic global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, C.J. (2015) The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aristodemou, M. (2014) Law, Psychoanalysis, Society: Taking the Unconscious Seriously. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BBC News (2018) Trump: Climate change scientists have “political agenda,” 15 October. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-45859325, accessed 1 January 2020.

  4. Biber, E., Kelsey, N., and Meckling, J. (2017) The political economy of decarbonization. Brooklyn Law Review 82(2): 605–643.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Botterill, L.C. (2017) Evidence-based policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, April. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clémençon, R. (2016) The two sides of the Paris climate agreement: Dismal failure or historic breakthrough? Journal of Environment & Development 25(1): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Danil, L.R. (2016) Trigger warnings, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and international security: Making a link. Critical Studies on Security 4(1): 121–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Danil, L.R. (2017) Keyu and others: Derridean hauntology and Lacanian-Žižekian psychoanalysis in between the lines. Law and Critique 28(1): 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Muzio, T. (2011) Crisis of petro-market civilization: The [past as prologue? In: S. Gill (ed.) Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dodds, J. (2011) Psychoanalysis and Ecology at the Edge of Chaos: Complexity Theory, Deleuze/Guattari and Psychoanalysis for a Climate in Crisis. Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fiorino, D.J. (2018) A Good Life on a Finite Earth: The Political Economy of Green Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foucault, M. (1991) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by A. Sheridan. London: Penguin.

  13. Freud, S. (1913/1955) Totem and Taboo. Standard Edition 13. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 1–164.

  14. Freud, S. (1920/1955) Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Standard Edition 18. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 7–64.

  15. Freud, S. (1927/1961) Fetishism. Standard Edition 21. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 152–158.

  16. Gabbattis, J. (2018) Ban new petrol and diesel cars by 2032 instead of current “unambitious” target, MPs say. The Independent, 19 October. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/petrol-diesel-cars-ban-vehicles-vans-2032-air-pollution-climate-change-a8590661.html, accessed 30 December 2019.

  17. Garnett, T. (2009) Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: Impacts and options for policy makers. Environmental Science & Policy 12(4): 491–503.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Godfray, C.H., Aveyard, P., Garnett, T., Hall, J.W., Key, T.J., Lorimer, J., Pierrehumbert, R.T., Scarborough, P., Springmann, M., and Jebb, S.A. (2018) Meat consumption, health and the environment. Science 361(6399): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hajjar, L. (2013) Torture: A Sociology of Violence and Human Rights. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hall, C.A.S., Lambert, J.G., and Balogh, S.B. (2014) EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy 64: 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall, C. and Pick, D. (2017) Thinking about denial. History Workshop Journal 84(1): 1– 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrabin, R. (2018) Climate change: Protecting the poor from green taxes. BBC News, 11 December. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-46522126, accessed 1 January 2020.

  23. Head, L. (2016) Grief, loss, and the cultural politics of climate change. In: H. Bulkeley, M. Paterson, and J. Stripple (eds.) Towards a Cultural Politics of Climate Change: Devices, Desires and Dissent. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  24. IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf, accessed 29 December 2019.

  25. Kassouf, S. (2017) Psychoanalysis and climate change: Revisiting Searles’s The Nonhuman Environment, rediscovering Freud’s phylogenetic fantasy, and imagining a future. American Imago 74(2): 141–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lacan, J. (2006) The mirror-stage as formative of the formation of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In: Écrits. Translated by B. Fink. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 75–81.

  27. Lacan. J. (2018) The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. Translated by A. Sheridan. Abingdon: Routledge.

  28. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Rosenthal, S., Cutler, M., and Kotcher, J. (2018) Politics & global warming. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Global-Warming-Policy-Politics-March-2018.pdf, accessed 1 January 2020.

  29. Levy, D.L. and Spicer, A. (2013) Contested imaginaries and the cultural political economy of climate change. Organization 20(5): 659–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin, R. (2016) The dubious promise of bioenergy plus carbon capture: Climate change agreements rest on negative emissions technologies that may be unachievable. MIT Technology Review, 8 January. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/544736/the-dubious-promise-of-bioenergy-plus-carbon-capture/, accessed 30 December 2019.

  31. Monbiot, G. (2018) The Earth is in a death spiral. It will take radical action to save us. The Guardian, 14 November. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/14/earth-death-spiral-radical-action-climate-breakdown, accessed 1 January 2020.

  32. Moran, M. and Wall, E. (2011) Livestock production and greenhouse gas emissions: Defining the problem and specifying solutions. Animal Frontiers 1(1): 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nordgren, A. (2012) Ethical issues in mitigation of climate change: The option of reduced meat production and consumption. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25(4): 563–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Science and Technology Committee (2014) Written evidence submitted by UCL Communicating Climate Science Policy Commission (CCSPC) (CLC045), 1 April. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmsctech/254/254we09.htm, accessed 13 January 2020.

  35. Sheehan, S. (2012) Žižek: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sodha, S. (2018) A radical way to cut emissions – ration everyone’s flights. The Guardian, 9 May. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/09/cut-emissions-flights-air-travel-flying, accessed 1 January 2020.

  37. Vanheule, S. (2011) Lacan’s construction and deconstruction of the double-mirror device. Frontiers in Psychology 2(209): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ward, B. (2018) The IPCC global warming report spares politicians the worst details. The Guardian, 8 October. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/oct/08/world-leaders-climate-change-ipcc-report, accessed 1 January 2020.

  39. Weintrobe, S. (2013) Engaging with Climate Change: Psychoanalytic and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wirsenius, S., Hedenus, F., and Mohlin, K. (2011) Greenhouse gas taxes on animal food products: Rationale, tax scheme and climate mitigation effects. Climate Change 108(1–2): 159–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Žižek, S. (2005) The Metastases of Enjoyment: Six Essays on Women and Causality. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Žižek, S. (2006) The Parallax View. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Žižek, S. (2009) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Žižek, S. (2012) Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

My thanks to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments in relation to this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Roland Danil.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Danil, L.R. On facing the crucial psychosocial and political-economic dimensions of anthropogenic global warming. Psychoanal Cult Soc 25, 271–282 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41282-020-00165-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • anthropogenic global warming
  • climate change
  • psychosocial
  • political economy