Advertisement

The visual matrix method in a study of death and dying: Methodological reflections

  • Ellen Ramvi
  • Julian Manley
  • Lynn Froggett
  • Anne Liveng
  • Aase Lading
  • Wendy Hollway
  • Birgitta Haga Gripsrud
Original Article

Abstract

The visual matrix method is designed to elicit imagistic and associative contributions established collectively amongst participants in a group setting. In this article, a hard-to-reach area of experience – death and dying – illustrates the production of shared cultural images beyond individual experience. Our dual purpose was to assess the suitability of the method for this challenging topic, and to understand the ways in which death figured in the imagination of the participants. Three theorists, Wilfred Bion, Alfred Lorenzer and Gilles Deleuze, enable us to theorise psychosocial processes of symbolisation beyond cognition.

Keywords

containment death psychosocial methodology reverie 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The workshop series Exploring Life Transitions in Old Age through a Visual Matrix (2014–15) was funded by the Joint Committee for Nordic Research Councils in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NOS-HS). We thank the invited participants for their contributions to the research.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bereswill, M., Morgenroth, C. and Redman, P. (2010) Alfred Lorenzer and the depth-hermeneutic method. Special Issue on Alfred Lorenzer. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 15(3): 221–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bion, W. (1962a) Learning from Experience. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  3. Bion, W. (1962b) A theory of thinking. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis 43: 306–310.Google Scholar
  4. Blackman, L. and Cromby, J. (2007) Editorial: Affect and feeling. Critical Psychology 21: 5–22.Google Scholar
  5. Bollas, C. (1987) The Shadow of the Object. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  6. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Britton, R. (1998) Belief and Imagination. Explorations in Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, C. (2017) Re-imagining dementia using the visual matrix. Journal of Social Work Practice (Special Edition) 31(2): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, S. and Hoggett, P. (2009) Researching Beneath the Surface. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  10. Day Sclater, S., Jones, D., Price, H. and Yates, C. (eds.) (2009) Emotion: New Psychosocial Perspectives. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G. (2004) Difference and Repetition. Translated by P. Patton. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G. and Guattarri, F. (1988) A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by B. Massumi. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  13. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1994) What is Philosophy? Translated by H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. (1900/1955) The Interpretation of Dreams. Standard Edition 4/5. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  15. Froggett, L. and Hollway, W. (2010) Psychosocial research analysis and scenic understanding. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 15(3): 281–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Froggett, L., Manley, J. and Roy, A. (2015) The visual matrix method: Imagery and affect in a group-based research setting. Forum: Qualitative Social Research.  https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.3.2308.Google Scholar
  17. Frosh, S. and Emerson, P. (2005) Interpretation and over-interpretation: Disputing the meaning of texts. Qualitative Research 5(3): 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilleard, C. and Higgs, P. (2011) Ageing abjection and embodiment in the fourth age. Journal of Aging Studies 25(2): 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greco, M. and Stenner, P. (2008) Emotions: A Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gripsrud, B.H., Ramvi, E., Froggett, L., Hellstrand, I. and Manley, J. (in press). Psychosocial and symbolic dimensions of the breast explored through a visual matrix. NORA: Nordic Journal of Gender and Feminist Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2018.1482958.
  21. Hoggett, P. (2010) Perverse social structures. Journal of Psycho-Social Studies 4(1). http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/hls/research/jpss/volume412010.aspx, accessed 7 June 2018.
  22. Hoggett, P., Beedell, P., Jimenez, L., Mayo, M. and Miller, C. (2010) Working psycho-socially and dialogically in research. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 15(2): 173–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollway, W. (2013) Locating unconscious ‘societal-collective’ processes in psychosocial research. Organisational and Social Dynamics 13(1): 22–40.Google Scholar
  24. Hollway, W. (2015) Knowing Mothers: Researching Maternal Identity Change. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollway, W. (2016) Emotional experience plus reflection: Countertransference and reflexivity in research. The Psychotherapist 62(Spring): 19–21.Google Scholar
  26. Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2013) Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Katz, S. (2000) Busy bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies 14(2): 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitwood, T. (1997) The experience of dementia. Aging and Mental Health 1(1): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kitwood, T. and Bredin, K. (1992) Towards a theory of dementia care: Personhood and well-being. Aging and Society 12(3): 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langer, S.K. (1948) Philosophy in a New Key: A Study in the Symbolism of Reason, Rite, and Art. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lavik, M.H. and Braut, G.S. (2016) Tru og bibelbruk som meistring ved alvorleg sjukdom [Faith and uses of the Bible in coping with serious illness]. Omsorg: Nordisk tidsskrift for palliativ medisin 1: 15–19.Google Scholar
  32. Liveng, A., Ramvi, E., Froggett, L., Manley, J., Hollway, W., Lading, Å. and Gripsrud, B.H. (2017) Imagining transitions in old age through the visual matrix method: Thinking about what is hard to bear. Journal of Social Work Practice (Special Edition) 31(2):155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lorenzer, A. (1981) What is an unconscious phantasy? Translated by T. Schaffrik. http://bidok.uibk.ac.at/library/schaffrik-lorenzer-work-e.html, accessed 3 March 2017.
  34. Lorenzer, A. (1986) Tiefenhermeneutische Kulturanalyse. In: A. Lorenzer (ed.) Kultur-Analysen: Psychoanalytische Studien zur Kultur. Frankfurt/M: Fischer, pp. 11–98.Google Scholar
  35. Manley, J. (2014) Gordon Lawrence’s social dreaming matrix: Background, origins, history and development. Organisational and Social Dynamics 14(2): 322–341.Google Scholar
  36. Manley, J. (2018) ‘Every human being is an artist’: From social representation to creative experiences of Self. In: A. M. Cummins and N. Williams (eds.) Further Researching Beneath the Surface. Psycho-Social Research Methods in Practice: Volume 2. London: Karnac, pp. 97–121.Google Scholar
  37. Manley, J. and Roy, A. (2017) The visual matrix: A psycho-social method for discovering unspoken complexities in social care practice. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 22(2): 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manley, J., Roy, A. and Froggett, L. (2015) Researching recovery from substance misuse using visual methods. In: L. Hardwick, R. Smith and A. Worsley (eds.) Innovation in Social Work Research. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  39. McLeod, J. and Thomson, R. (2009) Researching Social Change: Qualitative Approaches. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Money-Kyrle, R. (1961) Man’s Picture of His World: A Psycho-analytic Study. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  41. Nagbøl, S. (2003) Sociologi og pædagogik som forskningsfelt og praksisorienteret menneskevidenskab [Sociology and pedagogy as a research field and practice-oriented human science]. In: I. M. Bryderup (ed.) Pædagogisk sociologi [Pedagogical sociology]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag, pp. 119–145.Google Scholar
  42. Oeser, F. (2010) Social dreaming to creativity. In: G. W. Lawrence (ed.) The Creativity of Social Dreaming. London: Karnac, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
  43. Ogden, T. (2009) Rediscovering Psychoanalysis: Thinking, Dreaming, Learning and Forgetting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Ramvi, E. and Gripsrud, B.H. (2017) Silence about encounters with dying among healthcare professionals in a society that ‘de-tabooises’ death. International Practice Development Journal 7 (Suppl.) [3]: 1–12.Google Scholar
  45. Redman, P. (2009) Affect Revisited. Subjectivity 26(1): 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Redman, P., Bereswill, M. and Morgenroth, C. (2010) Introduction. Special Issue on Alfred Lorenzer. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society 15(3): 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roseneil, S. (2006) The ambivalences of Angel’s ‘arrangement’: A psychosocial lens on the contemporary condition of personal life. Sociological Review 54(4): 847–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roseneil, S. (2009) Haunting in an age of individualization, subjectivity, relationality and the traces of the lives of others. European Societies 11(3): 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roy, A. and Manley, J. (2017) Recovery and movement: Allegory and ‘journey’ as a means of exploring recovery from substance misuse. Journal of Social Work Practice (Special Edition) 31(2):191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rozanova, J. (2010) Discourse of successful aging in The Globe & Mail: Insights from critical gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies 24(4): 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salling Olesen, H. (2012) The societal nature of subjectivity: An interdisciplinary methodological challenge. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 13(3), Art. 4. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1908/3446, accessed 7 June 2018.
  52. Stopford, A. (2004) Researching postcolonial subjectivities: The application of relational (post-classical) psychoanalysis to research methodology. Critical Psychology 10: 13–35.Google Scholar
  53. Thomson, R., Moe, A., Thorne, B. and Nielsen, H.B. (2012) Situated affect in travelling data. Qualitative Inquiry 18(4): 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Urwin, C., Hauge, M.I., Hollway, W. and Haavind, H. (2013) Culture as a process lived through the person: Becoming a Bangladeshi mother in London. Qualitative Inquiry 19(6): 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walkerdine, V. (2010) Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body & Society 16(1): 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walkerdine, V. (2014) Félix Guattari and the psychosocial imagination. Journal of Psychosocial Studies 8(1): 146–158.Google Scholar
  57. Wetherell, M. (2008) Subjectivity or psycho-discursive practices? Investigating complex intersectional identities. Subjectivity 22(1): 73–81.Google Scholar
  58. Woodward, K. (2015) Psychosocial Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
  2. 2.Psychosocial Research Unit, School of Social Work, Care & CommunityUniversity of Central LancashirePrestonUK
  3. 3.Department of People and TechnologyRoskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark
  4. 4.University of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations