Advertisement

Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 204–210 | Cite as

Trigger warnings and the unformulated experience

  • Nirit Gordon
Original Article

Abstract

This paper reflects upon the debates over the use of trigger warnings in educational spaces from a feminist psychoanalytic perspective. The writer posits that underlying the debate is a dissociative mechanism that results in psychological splitting. Dissociation is used to defend against formulating and acknowledging students’ traumatic experiences, especially minority students, e.g., women and people of color. This dissociation is coupled with a patriarchal order that often frames educational pedagogy, and deems different human qualities as gendered and hierarchal. Rationality is equated with masculinity and valued, while emotionality is equated with femininity and devalued. Hence, educational spaces often privilege rational knowledge and diminish the role of emotion and intuition. This can lead to discussion of the latter becoming unwelcome and inappropriate. The writer argues that, in order to create educational spaces that foster critical thinking, and not mere reproduction of knowledge, the integration of the dissociated and devalued aspects of the experience is imperative.

Keywords

trigger warnings dissociation gender teaching pedagogy 

References

  1. Benjamin, J. (2013) The Bonds of Love: Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bollas, C. (1987) The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. London, U.K.: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  3. Breuer, J. (1895/1955) Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition 2. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 157–159.Google Scholar
  4. Freire, P. (1996) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Gilligan, C. (2011) Joining the Resistance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gilligan, C. and Richards, D.A. (2009) The Deepening Darkness: Patriarchy, Resistance and Democracy’s Future. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hanisch, C. (2000) The personal is political. In: Radical Feminism: A Documentary Reader. Edited by B. A. Crow. New York: NYU Press, pp. 113–117.Google Scholar
  8. hooks, b. (2000) Where We Stand: Class Matters. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Layton, L. (2013) Who’s That Girl? Who’s That Boy?: Clinical Practice Meets Postmodern Gender Theory (Vol. 2). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Pérez-Peña, R., Smith, M. and Saul, S. (2016) University of Chicago strikes back against campus political correctness. The New York Times, August 26. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/27/us/university-of-chicago-strikes-back-against-campus-political-correctness.html?_r=0, accessed 28 August 2016.
  11. Stern, D.B. (2013) Unformulated Experience: From Dissociation to Imagination in Psychoanalysis (Vol. 8). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. van der Kolk, B.A. and McFarlane, A.C. (eds.) (2012) Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Psychology, Counseling PsychologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations