Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 43–53 | Cite as

Trauma and psychoanalysis: Freud, Bion, and Mitchell

Article

Abstract

A key problem for trauma theory is bringing internal and external sources of distress together, paying sufficient attention to each. While Wilfred Bion is well-known among psychoanalytically-oriented trauma theorists, the relevance of his work to trauma is not always fully appreciated. Bion focuses on the inability to know. Freud made Eros and death the driving forces of the psyche, particularly in his later work; Klein made love, hate, and reparation central; Bion makes knowledge central. In conclusion, I turn to Stephen Mitchell in order to explain how focusing on the inability to know helps us better understand trauma.

Keywords

trauma Wilfred Bion Melanie Klein Stephen Mitchell psychoanalysis concept of O 

References

  1. Alford, C.F. (2016) Trauma, Culture, and PTSD. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bion, W.R. (1967a) Notes on memory and desire. Psychoanalytic Forum 2(3): 272-3.Google Scholar
  3. Bion, W.R. (1967b) Attacks on linking. In: Second Thoughts. New York: Jason Aronson, 1967, pp. 93-109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bion, W.R. (1984) Attention and Interpretation. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  5. Bion, W.R. (1991) A Memoir from the Future. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  6. Bion, W.R. (2015) War Memoirs 19171919. 2nd ed. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchot, M. (1995) The Writing of the Disaster. Translated by A. Smock. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blank, A. (2014) Interview with Cathy Caruth. In: C. Caruth (ed.) Listening to Trauma: Conversations with Leaders in the Theory and Treatment of Catastrophic Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 271-296.Google Scholar
  9. Caruth, C. (2001) An interview with Jean Laplanche. http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.101/11.2caruth.txt, accessed 20 December 2017.
  10. Eickhoff, F.W. (2006) On Nachträglichkeit: The modernity of an old concept. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 87: 1453–1469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fink, B. (1995) The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1898/1962) Sexuality in the aetiology of the neuroses. Standard Edition 3. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 261–286.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. (1930/1961) Civilization and its Discontents. Standard Edition 21. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 59–138.Google Scholar
  14. Grotstein, J. (2007) A Beam of Intense Darkness: Wilfred Bion’s Legacy to Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  15. Herman, J. (1997) Trauma and Recovery. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Joyce, P.A. (1995) Psychoanalytic theory, child sexual abuse and clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal 23(2): 199-214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laplanche, J. (1999) Notes on afterwardness. In: Essays on Otherness. Translated by J. Fletcher. London: Routledge, pp. 260-265.Google Scholar
  18. Levine, H. (2011) “The consolation which is drawn from truth”: the analysis of a patient unable to suffer experience. In: C. Mawson (ed.) Bion Today. New York: Routledge, pp. 188-211.Google Scholar
  19. Mitchell, S. (2014) Relationality: From Attachment to Intersubjectivity. Oxfordshire, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Phillips, A. (1996) On Flirtation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Souter, K.M. (2009) The War Memoirs: Some origins of the thought of W.R. Bion. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 90(4): 795-808.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. van der Kolk, B. (2014) The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  23. Williams, M.H. (1985) The tiger and “O”: A reading of Bion’s Memoir of the Future. Free Associations 1: 33-56.Google Scholar
  24. Winnicott, D.W. (1992) Mind and its relation to the psyche-soma. In: Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. London: Karnac, pp. 243-254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GovernmentUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations