Skip to main content
Log in

In medias res

  • Original Article
  • Published:
postmedieval Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As contemporary artistic practice has become ever more polymorphous and multispatial, large scale exhibitions have accommodated a wider array of emerging nonmodern epistemologies, materialities, and temporalities ‘in the middle’ (Latour, 1993, 47). As a critical means of considering contemporary art’s homologous nonmodern, this paper refracts two influential global exhibitions of contemporary art – dOCUMENTA (13) and Il Palazzo Encyclopedia – through the lens of Medievalisms Studies. Medievalisms Studies’ challenge to the ‘simplified binarization of premodern acts and modern identities’ (Fradenburg, 1997, 213) invites deeper scrutiny of contemporary art’s knowledges, materialities, and chronopolitics. Developing the medievalist analogies of the compendium and the relic, I focus on specific exempla presented within the curatorial frameworks of two key biennale that offer a macrocosmic discourse on contemporary art’s developing relations with knowledges, materials, and time. In unfolding anachronic materialist narratives, a nonmodern sensibility promised to liberate emerging art from the social constructivist paradigms that still dominate contemporary art. As a corollary of their nonmodern materialist epistemologies, the biennale that form my exempla also attempted to (dis)place the practices they curated through a polytemporality in which now-and-then and here-and-there are intertwined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Residual medievalisms contrast with what Alexander Nagel calls ‘instances of deliberate medievalism’ found in modernism (Nagel, 2012, 22). I will adapt Prendergast and Trigg’s neologism ‘medievalization’ to similar ends, considering ‘deliberate’ medievalisms as ‘theory-fictions that facilitate ludic speculation on nonmodern futurities’ (Confraternity of Neoflagellants, 2013).

  2. This is equally evident in Medievalisms Studies. For example, in Getting Medieval, Carolyn Dinshaw performed a premodern/postmodern comparative studies vis a vis sexuality (Dinshaw, 1999).

  3. Founded by Marieke van Hal in 2009, the supranational International Biennale Association (www.biennialfoundation.org) has solicited the establishment of Biennology, the scholarly study of large-scale international exhibitions. See Kompatsiaris (2017) and Seismopolite (2013).

  4. dOCUMENTA is a ‘massive, temporally and geographically dispersed event’ […] that it is ‘far beyond the ability of any one spectator to behold’ (Masters, 2012, 128). dOCUMENTA 13, for example, granted its bulla to Alexandria (Egypt), Banff (Canada), and Kabul (Afghanistan) as its sanctioned sites of artistic pilgrimage, anointing them in its mappa mundi as a constituent part of its own domain. In International Relations, such supranational territorialisation is considered a quintessentially neomedieval bid for overlordship (Friedrichs, 2001).

  5. In this, Gioni extends the dialogue between the new museology and the practices of ‘museological art’ in the 1990s. See Vergo (1989); Weschler (1996); and McShine (1999).

  6. ‘It best reflects the giant scope of this international exhibition,’ Gioni said, ‘the impossibility of capturing the sheer enormity of the art world today’ (Vogel, 2013).

  7. See The LongNow Foundation website (longnow.org).

  8. Artists featured include Ed Atkins, Louise Bourgeois, Prunella Clough, John Gerrard, Robert Gober, Nicola Hicks, Roger Hiorns, Alex Hubbard, Dwight Mackintosh, Pierre Molinier, James Rosenquist, Jim Shaw, William Blake, John Tenniel, and Tøyen.

  9. An example of object-biography in practice drawn from the broader 2013 Venice Biennale is the Catalonian national Pavillion 25%, a project curated by curator Jordi Balló, artist Francesc Torres, and filmmaker Mercedes Álvarez in association with the MACBA (Museum of Contemporary Art of Barcelona). Herein eight unemployed Catalans each chose a work from the MACBA permanent collection. By engaging with the making, use, and future life of their chosen object, they articulate their own subjects of inquiry.

  10. See Dickie (1997) and Becker (1982).

  11. Danto’s take on the veneration of the neodada readymade in the early 1960s is akin to the logic of relic-ing (Danto, 1964). His loaded use of the medievalism ‘transfiguration’ as a heuristic is a medievalization that invokes the social processes that elevated things into authenticated relics. Interestingly, Nagel inverts Danto’s speculative axiom, proposing that ‘The relic’s structural role in the medieval image economy […] comes into view differently when the logic of the readymade is brought to bear on the question’ (Nagel, 2012, 22).

  12. See also Hahn (2012 and 2017).

  13. This, in itself, can be regarded as an operational bias in relation to the broader contemporaneous debates within the new materialisms. For example, rather than foreground the way in which things withdraw, art exhibitions such as dOCUMENTA(13) continued to emphasise the way in which they are entangled.

  14. An influential example of social constructivism was relational aesthetics, ‘a set of artistic practices which take as their theoretical and practical point of departure the whole of human relations and their social context, rather than an independent and private space’ (Bourriaud, 1998, 113).

  15. Given that contemporary art is a field so frequently dedicated to promoting human exceptionalism, it is unsurprising that it proved difficult for biennale to pass themselves off as actors of no fixed ontology.

  16. See Anselm Franke’s Animism. Exhibition, Conference, 16 March–6 May 2012, Haus der Kulturen der Welt (HKW) Berlin; and Nicolas Bourriaud’s The Great Acceleration: Art in the Anthropocene, Taipei Biennial 2014.

  17. Similarly, the medievalist Jeffrey Cohen argued that ‘human identity has always depended upon and been sustained by dispersive networks of actors and objects, meshworks that prevent the human from ever possessing a finite form, an unchanging ontology, a diminutive boundlessness’ (Cohen, 2010, 58).

  18. Nagel wisely cautions here against only seeing continuities: ‘The object is not to deepen the register of historical influences or to retrieve a new set of legitimising precursors for modern practice, thus rendering it traditional and familiar after all, but to activate a wider set of reference points that cannot be arranged chronologically. The practitioners of modern art themselves provided some good tools for dealing with these relationships’ (Nagel, 2012, 22).

  19. ‘The alterity of the Middle Ages continues to secure, for modernity, its intelligibility to itself’ (Fradenburg, 1997, 211).

  20. Preposterous in so far as the ‘authentic’ is a decidedly modern form of presentism, for ‘there was no conceptual room for forgery in a copy culture’ (Nagel, 2012, 235).

References

  • Ades, D., S. Baker, and F. Bradley. 2006. Undercover Surrealism: Georges Bataille and Documents. London and Cambridge, MA: Hayward Gallery/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnish, S. 1998. Encyclopedists, Medieval. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, eds. R. Copenhauver, et al. London: Routledge. https://www.rep.routledge.com

  • Becker, H.S. 1982. Art Worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, H. 1987. The End of the History of Art? Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belting, H. 2011. An Anthropology of Images: Picture, Medium, Body. Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonami, F. 2013. Omnivore’s Dilemma: Francesco Bonami interviews Massimiliano Gioni. Artforum international 51(9): 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourriaud, N. 1998. Esthétique Relationnelle. Dijon, France: Presses du Réel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. 2010. Biomedia in the time of animation. postmedieval 1(1–2): 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, S. 2013. The Anti-political Aesthetics of Objects and Worlds Beyond. Mute, 25 July. http://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/anti-political-aesthetics-objects-and-worlds-beyond

  • Callois, R. 1985. The Writing of Stones. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, P.G. 2004. The New Security Dilemma Revisited: Neomedievalism and the Limits of Hegemony. Montréal, Canada: International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, J. 2013. Why we’re all looking at artefacts as inscrutable, quasimagical things. Art Review. November.

  • Charlesworth, J.H. 2014. Subjects v Objects. Art Monthly, March: 374.

  • Christov-Bakargiev, C. and B. Funcke. 2012. dOCUMENTA (13): The Book of Books, catalog 1/3. Ostfildern, Germany: Hatje Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.J. 2010. Stories of Stone. postmedieval 1(1–2): 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Confraternity of Neoflagellants. (N. Mulholland and N. Hogg), eds. 2013. thN Lng folk 2go: Investigating Future Premoderns. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.

  • Danto, A. 1964. The Artworld. Journal of Philosophy 61(19): 571–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arcens, L. 2014. Presentism. In Medievalism: Key Critical Terms, eds. E. Emery and R. Utz, 181–8. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell and Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, G. 1997. The Art Circle: A Theory of Art. Evanston, IL: Chicago Spectrum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinshaw, C. 1999. Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre- and Postmodern. London and Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinshaw, C. 2012. How Soon is Now: Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers, and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, S. 2012. Doing Nothing, dOCUMENTA (13): 100 Notes—100 Thoughts, 100 Notizen—100 Gedanken. Kassel, Germany: Hatje Cantz 22.

  • Farquharson, A. and K. Wilson-Goldie. 2012. Get Together. Frieze 149: 150–4. https://frieze.com/article/get-together

  • Faivovich, G. and N. Goldberg. 2012. The Camp del Cielo Meteorites, Vol. II. Köln, Germany: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther Konig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischli, P. and D. Weiss. 2015. Plötzlich diese Übersicht. Basel, Switzerland: Laurenz Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, H. 2012. Preposterous Timing. Review of Medieval Modern: Art out of Time by Nagel, A. London Review of Books 34(21): online. https://www.lrb.co.uk/v34/n21/hal-foster/preposterous-timing

  • Fowler, C. and O.J.T. Harris. 2015. Enduring Relations: Exploring a Paradox of New Materialism. Journal of Material Culture 20(2): 127–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fradenburg, L.O. 1997. So That We May Speak of Them: Enjoying the Middle Ages. New Literary History, 28(2): 205–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, A. 2010. Animism (Volume I). Berlin, Germany: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin-Brown, M. 2012. Reading the World: Encyclopedic Writing in the Scholastic Age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, J. 2001. The Meaning of New Medievalism. European Journal of International Relations 7(4): 475–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, P.J. 1978. Furta Sacra: Thefts of Relics in the Central Middle Ages. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geary, P. 1986. Sacred Commodities: The Circulation of Medieval Relics. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, ed. A. Appadurai, 169–91. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioni, M. 2013. Introduction by Massimiliano Gioni, Curator of the Biennale Arte 2013. Venice Biennale. https://www.labiennale.org/en/art/2013/introduction-massimiliano-gioni

  • Goodman, N. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C.J. 2010. What Do Reliquaries Do for Relics? Numen 57(3): 284–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C. 2011. Objects of Devotion and Desire: Medieval Relic to Contemporary Art. New York: Hunter College of the City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C.J. 2012. Strange Beauty: Issues in the Making and Meaning of Reliquaries, 400–circa 1204. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, C.J. 2017. The Reliquary Effect: Enshrining the Sacred Object. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.G. 2009. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D. 1997. Modernism Since Postmodernism: Essays on Intermedia. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, B. 2005. The Premodern Condition: Medievalism and the Making of Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, B.W. 2007. Neomedievalism, Neoconservatism, and the War on Terror. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, C.S. and A.C.T. Smith. 2014. Talking Objects: Towards a Post-Social Research Framework for Exploring Object Narratives. Organization 21(4): 477–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings, K. 2008. Time and World Politics: Thinking the Present. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. 2012. Towards and Ecology of Materials. Annual Review of Anthropology (41): 427–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, E. 2010. The traherence of the past. postmedieval 1(1–2): 291–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlholm, D. 2016. After Contemporary Art: Actualization and Anachrony. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 51: 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernbauer, E. 2017. Anachronic concepts, art historical containers and historiographical practices in contemporary art. Journal of Art Historiography 16: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibre, P. 1948. The Nations in the Mediaeval Universities. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, I. 2013. Chronopolitics: A Conceptual Matrix. Progress in Human Geography 37(5): 673–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kompatsiaris, P. 2017. The Politics of Contemporary Art Biennials: Spectacles of Critique, Theory and Art. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopytoff, I. 1986. The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process. In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, ed. A. Appadurai, 64–91. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeller, P. 1951. The Modern System of the Arts. Journal of the History of Ideas 12: 496–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Madoff, S. 2013. Venice in the age of Abstraction: the 55th Biennale. Modern Painters 25(9): 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, H. 2012. Documenta 13. ART AsiaPacific 80: 128–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. 2011. From Mediaeval to Mediaevalism: A New Semantic History. The Review of English Studies 62(257): 695–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. 2015. Medievalism: A Critical History. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell and Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean-Ferris, L. 2013. Laura McLean-Ferris ‘Indifferent Objects.’ Art Monthly, July/August: 368.

  • McShine, K. 1999. The Museum as Muse. New York: Museum of Modern Art/H.N. Abrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morowitz, L. 2014. Primitive. In Medievalism: Key Critical Terms, eds. E. Emery and R. Utz, 189–98. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell and Brewer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton. T. 2013. Realist Magic: Objects, Ontology, Causality. Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing for Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulholland, N. 2011. Nuke the Fridge. In Mark Leckey: SEE, WE ASSEMBLE at Serpentine Gallery, London, May–June 2011, eds. M. Larner and K. Rattee, 66–7. Cologne, Germany and New York: Walther Koenig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, A. 2012. Medieval Modern. X: Thames and Hudson.

  • Osborne, P. 2013a. Temporalization as Transcendental Aesthetics: Avant-garde, Modern, Contemporary. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 44/45: 28–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, P. 2013b. Anywhere or Not at All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art. London and New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, C. 1980. The Allegorical Impulse: Toward a Theory of Postmodernism. October 12: 67–86.

  • Papaioannou, C. 2017. Ahead of its Time: Historicity, Chronopolitics, and the Idea of the Avant-garde after Modernism. PhD Dissertation. The University of Leeds

  • Pedersen, O. 1998. The First Universities: Studium Generale and the Origins of University Education in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast, T.A. and S. Trigg. 2007. What Is Happening to the Middle Ages? New Medieval Literatures 9: 215–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridder-Symoens, H.D. 1991. MOBILITY. In A History of the University in Europe: Volume 1: Universities in the Middle Ages, ed. H. D. Ridder-Symoens, 280–304. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B.D.S. 2018. The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, M.B. 1972. Archaeological context and systemic context. American Antiquity 37: 156–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seismopolite. 2013. Journal of Art and Politics. http://www.seismopolite.com.

  • Siegel, K. 2013. Worlds With Us. The Brooklyn Rail. July/August. brooklynrail.org/2013/07/art/worlds-with-us

  • Smith, T., O. Enwezor, and N. Condee. 2008. Antinomies of Art and Culture: Modernity, Postmodernity, Contemporaneity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. 2012. What is Contemporary Curatorial Thought? In Thinking Contemporary Curating. I. Independent Curators, ed. T. Smith, 28–55. New York: Independent Curators International.

  • Steiner, E. 2015. Compendious Genres: Higden, Trevisa, and the Medieval Encyclopedia. Exemplaria 27(1–2): 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utz, R. 2017. Medievalism: A Manifesto. Kalamazoo, MI and Bradford: Arc Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergo, P. 1989. The New Museology. London, Reaktion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C. 2013. New Guide in Venice. The New York Times. 23 May. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/26/arts/design/massimiliano-gioni-of-venice-biennale.html

  • Virilio, P. and J. Rose. 2011. The Insecurity Of History. Log 23: 71–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, G.W. 1970. Chronopolitics: The Impact of Time Perspectives on the Dynamics of Change. Social Forces 49(1): 102–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weschler, L. 1996. Mr. Wilson’s Cabinet of Wonder. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Mulholland.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mulholland, N. In medias res. Postmedieval 10, 388–407 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-019-00131-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41280-019-00131-1

Navigation