Transnational solidarity: a transformative narrative for the EU and its citizens?

Abstract

Empirical studies provide increasingly powerful evidence of solidarity in Europe, although attitudes and practices vary across States and policies, are often conditional and face problems of durability. Solidarity is strongest in national or local settings and typically manifests political activity, especially in relation to countering social inequalities. This article focuses on the implications of these findings for the EU, a transnational community seemingly disconnected from its citizens and now discussing its future orientation. It is argued that the ‘soft’ power of transnational solidarity needs nurturing for the EU to enhance its relevance, legitimacy and resilience. Member State solidarity and EU institutional design have hitherto proved weak in delivering meaningful social measures or in elaborating European citizenship beyond market-related paradigms. Any sustainable transformative step requires refocusing upon a ‘horizontal’ solidarity among citizens across borders to reboot and articulate ‘social integration’. This necessitates reframing the relationship between political and legal narratives. The legal paradigm has hitherto favoured top-down notions of rights-based EU citizenship over solidarity as a principle or standard. This article develops a notion of transnational solidarity by connecting the factual potency of solidarity as felt by citizens to the underpinning strategies of a resilient governance framework to capture it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adonnino, P. 1985. A People’s Europe. https://aei.pitt.edu/992/1/andonnino_report_peoples _europe.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2020.

  2. Anderson, B., Shutes, I. and Walker, S. 2016. Mobility and citizenship in Europe: from the worker-citizen to inclusive European Citizenship. https://beucitizen.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017-01-12-POLICY-BRIEF-WP10-Anderson-Shutes-and-Walker-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  3. Athanasiadou, N. 2018. The European Citizens’ Initiative in times of Brexit. European Papers 3 (3): 1379–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Azoulai, L. 2017. Transfiguring European Citizenship: from Member State territory to Union territory. In EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights, ed. D. Kochenov, 178–203. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baute, S., B. Meuleman, K. Abts, and M. Swyngedouw. 2018. Measuring Attitudes Towards Social Europe: A Multidimensional Approach. Social Indicators Research 137 (1): 353–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bayertz, K. (ed.). 1999. Solidarity. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bellamy, R. 2008. Citizenship. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  8. BEUCITIZEN All Rights Reserved? Barriers Towards European Citizenship. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/108458/reporting/en.

  9. Biondi, A., E. Dagilytė, and E. Küҫük (eds.). 2018. Solidarity in EU Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bruegel. .2018. Policy Brief. One Size Does not Fit All: European Integration by Differentiation. bruegel.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PB-2018_03_final3.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  11. Chandler, D. 2014. Resilience – the Governance of Complexity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ciornei, I., and E. Recchi. 2017. At the Source of European Solidarity: Assessing the Effects of Cross-Border Practices and Political Attitudes. Journal of Common Market Studies 55 (3): 468–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CITISPYCE (Combating Inequalities Through Innovative Social Practices of, and for, Young People in Cities across Europe). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/106725/reporting/en.

  14. Dagilytė, E. 2018. Solidarity: A General Principle of EU Law? Two Variations on the Solidarity Theme. In Solidarity in EU Law, ed. A. Biondi, E. Dagilytė, and E. Küҫük, 61–90. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Della Porta, D. (ed.). 2018. Solidarity Mobilizations in the “Refugee Crisis” – Contentious Moves. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Schutter, H. 2017. The Solidarity Argument for the European Union. In A European Social Union After the Crisis, ed. F. Vandenbroucke, C. Barnard, and G. de Baere, 68–91. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Witte, F. 2015. Justice in the EU – The Emergence of Transnational Solidarity. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Díez Medrano, J., I. Ciornei, and F. Apaydin. 2019. Explaining Supranational Solidarity. In Everyday. Europe Social transnationalism in an unsettled continent, ed. E. Recchi, 121–145. Bristol: Policy Press, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  19. ETHOS (Towards a European Theory of Justice and Fairness). https://ethos-europe.eu/.

  20. EU3D (EU Differentiation, Dominance and Democracy). https://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/eu3d/. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  21. EUCROSS (The Europeanisation of Everyday Life: Cross-Border Practices and Transnational Identities among EU and Third-Country Citizens), https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/98871/reporting/en.

  22. EUENGAGE (Bridging the Gap between Public Opinion and European leadership: Engaging a dialogue on the future path of Europe). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/194568/factsheet/en.

  23. EU IDEA (EU Integration and Differentiation for Effectiveness and Accountability). https://www.iai.it/en/ricerche/eu-integration-and-differentiation-effectiveness-and-accountability-eu-idea. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  24. European Commission. 2017a. White Paper on the Future of Europe and the Way Forward. COM (2017) 2025 final.

  25. European Commission. 2017b. Reflection Paper on the Social Dimension of Europe. COM (2017) 206 final.

  26. European Commission. 2018a. Solidarity in Europe. Alive and Active. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/solidarity_in_europe.pdf. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  27. European Commission. 2018b. Press Release 11 June 2018 https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4035_en.htm. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  28. European Commission. 2018c. Press Release 12 December 2018. https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-6792_en.htm. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  29. European Commission. 2018d. EU Budget for the Future: European Solidarity Corps Beyond 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/budget-may2018-solidarity-corps-beyond-2020_en.pdf. Accessed 28 February 2019.

  30. European Commission. 2018e. Past, Present and Future of Democracy. Policy Review by Merkel, W. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/4bebf83d-60ba-11e9-b6eb-01aa75ed71a1/language-en. Accessed 1 February 2020.

  31. European Commission. 2019. Policy Review by Ross, M. and Ciornei, I. Transformations of European Citizenship: Beyond Free Movement. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c83d6aa4-3d1f-11ea-ba6e-01aa75ed71a1. Accessed 31 January 2020.

  32. European Commission. 2020. Shaping the Conference on the Future of Europe. COM(2020) 27 final.

  33. European Parliament. 2020. European Parliament resolution of 15 January 2020 on the European Parliament’s position on the Conference on the Future of Europe. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0010_EN.html accessed 1 February 2020.

  34. Federico, V., and C. Lahusen (eds.). 2018. Solidarity as a Public Virtue?. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ferrera, M. 2017. The European Social Union: A Missing but Necessary ‘Political Good’. In A European Social Union After the Crisis, ed. F. Vandenbroucke, C. Barnard, and G. Baere, 47–67. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ferrera, M. 2018. The European Social Union; how to piece it together. In B. Vanhercke, D. Ghailani and S. Sabato Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2018. ETUI/OSE.

  37. Folke, C. 2016. Resilience (republished). Ecology and Society 21: 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerhards, J., H. Lengfeld, Z. Ignácz, F. Kley, and M. Priem. 2020. European Solidarity in Times of Crisis. Insights from a Thirteen-Country Survey. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Grasso, M., B. Yoxon, S. Karampampas, and L. Temple. 2019. Relative Deprivation and Inequalities in Social and Political Activism. Acta Politica 54: 398–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Grimmel, A., and S.M. Giang (eds.). 2017. Solidarity in the EU. A Fundamental Value in Crisis. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Juncker, J-C. (2016) State of the Union address, https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-16-3043_en.htm. Accessed 27 February 2019.

  42. Knodt, M., and A. Tews. 2017. European solidarity and its limits: insights from current political challenges. In Solidarity in the EU. A Fundamental Value in Crisis, ed. A. Grimmel and S.M. Giang, 47–66. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kolers, A. 2016. A Moral Theory of Solidarity. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Küҫük, E. 2018. Solidarity in EU Law: An Elusive Political Statement or a Legal Principle with Substance. In Solidarity in EU Law, ed. A. Biondi, E. Dagilytė, and E. Küҫük, 38–60. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lahusen, C. 2018. European Solidarity: An Introduction to a Multifaceted Phenomenon. In TranSOL, Synthesis of Project’s Main Findings, https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/194579/results/en. Accessed 28 February 2019.

  46. Lahusen, C., and M. Grasso (eds.). 2018. Solidarity in Europe. Citizens’ Responses in Times of Crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lahusen, C., and M. Grasso. 2018. Solidarity in Europe: A Comparative Assessment and Discussion. In Solidarity in Europe. Citizens’ Responses in Times of Crisis, ed. C. Lahusen and M. Grasso. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lahusen, C., and M. Theiss. 2019. European Transnational Solidarity: Citizenship in Action? American Behavioural Scientist 63 (4): 444–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leclercq, C., Clarotti, G., Costa, O. (2020) A ‘Conference on the future of the EU’ What Next? EU Elections 2024. https://www.euractiv.com/section/future-eu/opinion/a-conference-on-the-future-of-eu-what-next-eu-elections-2024/. Accessed 10 February 2020.

  50. Lenaerts, K., and J. Gutierrez-Fons. 2017. Epilogue on EU citizenship: hopes and fears. In EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights, ed. D. Kochenov, 751–781. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Leuffen, D., B. Rittberger, and F. Schimmelfennig. 2012. Differentiated Integration. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  52. LIVEWHAT (Living with Hard Times: How European Citizens Deal with Economic Crises and their Social and Political Consequences). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/111397/reporting/en.

  53. Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Meuleman, B., van Oorschot, W., Baute, S., Delespaul, S., Gugushvilli, D., Laenen, T., Roosma, F. and Rossetti, F. 2018. The Past, Present and Future of European Welfare Attitudes: Topline Results from Round 8 of the European Social Survey. https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS8_toplines_issue_8_welfare.pdf p.10. Accessed 14 February 2019.

  55. MYPLACE (Memory, Youth, Political Legacy and Civil Engagement). https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/99645/reporting/en

  56. Neuvonen, P. 2016. Equal Citizenship and Its Limits in EU Law. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Pennings, F., and M. Seeleib-Kaiser. 2018. EU Citizenship and Social Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  58. RAN Issue Paper. 2018. Protective and promotive factors building resilience against violent radicalisation. https://trivalent-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2018_ran_paper_protective_factors_042018_en.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2020.

  59. Recchi, E. 2017. The Engine of ‘Europeanness’? Free Movement, Social Transnationalism and European Identification. In Questioning EU Citizenship – Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, ed. D. Thym, 135–148. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Reynolds, S. 2018. Aim and Duty, Sword and Shield: Analysing the Cause and Effects of the Malleability of ‘Social Integration’ in EU law. European Papers 3 (2): 693–732.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ross, M. 2010. Solidarity A New Constitutional Paradigm for the EU? In Promoting Solidarity in the European Union, ed. M. Ross and Y. Borgmann-Prebil, 23–45. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sangiovanni, A. 2013. Solidarity in the European Union. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33 (2): 213–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sangiovanni, A. 2019. Debating the EU’s Raison d’Ȇtre: On the relation between Legitimacy and Justice. Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (1): 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Schiek, D. 2012. Economic and Social Integration: The Challenge for EU Constitutional Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Schiek, D. 2017. Perspectives on Social Citizenship in the EU: From status positivus to status socialis activus Via Two Forms of Transnational Solidarity. In EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights, ed. D. Kochenov, 341–370. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schulmeister, P. (ed) .2018. Delivering on Europe. Citizens’ Views on Current and Future EU Action. In European Parliament Eurobarometer Surveys No 89. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/be-heard/eurobarometer/delivering-on-europe-citizens-views-on-current-and-future-eu-action. Accessed 14 February 2019.

  67. Schuman Declaration 9 May 1950. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/symbols/europe-day/schuman-declaration_en. Accessed 1 February 2020.

  68. Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2017) Limited social rights and the case for a European minimum income scheme. https://beucitizen.eu/publications/european-policy-brief-limited-social-rights-and-the-case-for-a-european-minimum-income-scheme/.

  69. Seubert, S. 2017. Antinomies of European Citizenship: on the Conflictual Passage of a Transnational Membership Regime. In The Transformation of Citizenship. Volume 2: Boundaries of Inclusion and Exclusion, ed. J. Mackert and B. Turner, 135–151. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Seubert, S., E. Eberl, and F. van Waarden (eds.). 2018. Reconsidering EU Citizenship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Seubert, S., M. Hoogenboom, T. Knijn, S. de Vries, and F. van Waarden. 2018. Moving Beyond Barriers. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  72. SOLIDUS (Solidarity in European Societies: Empowerment, Social Justice and Citizenship), https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/194587_en.html. Accessed 14 February 2019.

  73. Spaventa, E. 2017. Earned Citizenship – Understanding European Citizenship Through Its Scope. In EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights, ed. D. Kochenov, 204–225. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stjernø, S. 2009. Solidarity in Europe: The History of an Idea. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Strumia, F. 2017. European Citizenship and Transnational Rights: Chronicles of a Troubled Narrative. In Questioning EU Citizenship – Judges and the Limits of Free Movement and Solidarity in the EU, ed. D. Thym, 149–167. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Thym, D. 2017. Frontiers of EU Citizenship: Three Trajectories and Their Methodological Limitations. In EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights, ed. D. Kochenov, 705–730. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  77. TransSOL (European paths to transnational solidarity at times of crisis: conditions, forms, role-models and policy responses), https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/194579_en.html. Accessed 14 February 2019.

  78. TRIVALENT (Terrorism Prevention via Radicalisation Counter-Narrative) https://trivalent-project.eu/the-project/.

  79. Vandenbroucke, F., Burgoon, B., Kuhn, T., Nicoli, F., Sacchi, S., van der Duin, D. and Hegewald, S., (eds) (2018) Risk Sharing When Unemployment Hits: How Policy Design Influences Citizen Support for European Unemployment Risk Sharing (EURS). Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research.

  80. Wiener, A. 2017. Going Home? ‘European’ Citizenship Practice Twenty Years After. In EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights, ed. D. Kochenov, 243–268. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Williams, A. 2009. Taking Values Seriously: Towards a Philosophy of EU Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29 (3): 549–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Cases and Opinions

  1. Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk, EU:C:2001:458.

  2. Advocate General Bot, Opinion 26 July 2017 Cases C-643/15 and C-647/15 Slovak Republic and Hungary v Council of the European Union, ECLI:EU:C:2017:618.

  3. Advocate General Sharpston, Opinion 31 October 2019 Cases C-715/17, C718/17 and C-719/17 European Commission v Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2019:917.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm Ross.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ross, M. Transnational solidarity: a transformative narrative for the EU and its citizens?. Acta Polit (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00170-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Solidarity
  • Transnational
  • EU citizenship
  • Resilience