Against Eurocentric Anti-Eurocentrism: International Relations, Historical Sociology and Political Marxism

Original Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The critique of Eurocentrism has become one of the main benchmarks for critical scholarship in International Relations (IR). Unsurprisingly, the effort to overcome Eurocentric conceptions of world history has been at the forefront of the bourgeoning subfield of International Historical Sociology (IHS). In many anti-Eurocentric theorisations of IHS, Political Marxist approaches to world history have been posited as counter-models imbued with methodological ‘internalism’ and Eurocentrism. In this article, I critically re-evaluate the extent to which IHS has remedied the problem of Eurocentrism. Furthermore, I argue that the conventional critique of Political Marxism (PM) is largely off the mark and, indeed, IHS in general and the theory of Uneven and Combined Development in particular need PM to deepen the international sociological imagination and deliver a non-hierarchical reading of world history.

Keywords

Eurocentrism International Historical Sociology International Relations Political Marxism Uneven and combined development 

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2014. Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds: A New Agenda for International Studies. International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin, Samir. 2009. Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anievas, Alexander, and Kerem Nisancioglu. 2015. How the West Came to Rule. London: Pluto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anievas, Alexander, and Kamran Matin (eds.). 2016. Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Ashman, Sam. 2009. Capitalism, Uneven and Combined Development and the Transhistoric. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (1): 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barkawi, Tarak, and Mark Laffey. 2006. The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies. Review of International Studies 32 (4): 329–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhambra, G.K. 2011. Historical Sociology, International Relations and Connected Histories. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23 (1): 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilgin, Pinar. 2010. The “Western-Centrism” of Security Studies: “Blind Spot” or Constitutive Practice? Security Dialogue 41 (6): 615–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blaut, J.M. 1993. The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brenner, Robert. 1977. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo Smithian Marxism. New Left Review 104: 25–92.Google Scholar
  11. Brenner, Robert. 2007. Property and Progress: Where Adam Smith Went Wrong. In Marxist History Writing for the 21st Century, ed. Chris Wickham, 49–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brenner, Robert. 1985a. Agrarian Class Structures and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe. In The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe, eds. Trevor Henry Aston and C. H. E. Philpin, 10–63, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brenner, R. 1985b. The Agrarian Roots of European Capitalism. In The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe, eds. T. Henry Aston and C. H. E. Philpin, 213–327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brenner, Robert. 1986. The Social Bases of Economic Development. In Analytical Marxism, ed. John Roemer, 23–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bryant, Joseph. 2006. The West and the Rest Revisited: Debating Capitalist Origins, European Colonialism, and the Advent of Modernity. Canadian Journal of Sociology 31 (4): 403–444.Google Scholar
  16. Buzan, Barry, and George Lawson. 2015. The Global Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2010. World History and the Development of Non-Western International Relations Theory. In Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia, ed. Amitav Acharya, and Barry Buzan, 197–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2000. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Callinicos, Alex, and Justin Rosenberg. 2008. Uneven and Combined Development: The Social-Relational Substratum of “the International”? An Exchange of Letters. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 (1): 77–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Comninel, George C. 1987. Rethinking the French Revolution: Marxism and the Revisionist Challenge. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  22. Dimmock, Spencer. 2017. Eastern origins of Capitalism? Historical Materialism blog. http://www.historicalmaterialism.org/blog/eastern-origins-capitalism. Accessed April 2017.
  23. Duzgun, Eren. 2017a. Property, Geopolitics, and Eurocentrism: The “Great Divergence” and the Ottoman Empire. Review of Radical Political Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613416673163.Google Scholar
  24. Duzgun, Eren. 2017b. The International Relations of ‘Bourgeois Revolutions’: Disputing the Turkish Revolution. European Journal of International Relations.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066117714527.Google Scholar
  25. Duzgun, Eren. 2018. Capitalism, Jacobinism and International Relations: Re-interpreting the Ottoman path to modernity. Review of International Studies 44 (2): 252–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans, Jessica. 2016. The uneven and combined development of class forces: Migration as combined development. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28 (3): 1061–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goody, Jack. 2004. The Theft of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grovogui, Siba. 2002. Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition. European Journal of International Relations 8 (3): 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haldon, John. 1994. The State and the Tributary Mode of Production. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  30. Halliday, Fred. 1999. Revolution in World Politics. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halperin, Sandra. 2006. International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western Conceptions of Hegemony. In Decolonizing International Relations, ed. B.G. Jones, 43–64. Plymouth: Rowman Littlefield.Google Scholar
  32. Heller, H. 2009. The longue durée of the French bourgeoisie. Historical Materialism 17 (1): 31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobden, Steve, and John M. Hobson (eds.). 2002. Historical Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hobson, John M. 2002. What’s at stake in “Bringing Historical Sociology Back” into International Relations? Transcending “Chronofetishism” and “Tempocentrism” in international relations. In Historical Sociology of International Relations, ed. Stephen Hobden, and John M. Hobson, 3–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hobson, John M. 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hobson, John M. 2012. The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hobson, J., G. Lawson, and J. Rosenberg. 2010. Historical Sociology. LSE Research Online. www.eprints.lse.ac.uk/28016/1/Historical_sociology(LSERO.pdf. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  38. Hodgson, Marshall. 1993. Rethinking World History: Essays on Europe, Islam, and World History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Inayatullah, Naeem, and David Blaney. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Isakhan, Benjamin, and Stephen Stockwell (eds.). 2011. The Secret History of Democracy. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  41. Jahn, Beate. 2000. The Cultural Construction of International Relations: The Invention of the State of Nature. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Knafo, Sam. 2013. The Making of Modern Finance: Liberal Governance and the Gold Standard. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Lacher, H. 2015. Polanyian Perspectives on Global History, unpublished paper, presented at the workshop ‘Beyond the Eurocentrism Debate’. Halle: Max Planck Institute for Social AnthropologyGoogle Scholar
  44. Lacher, Hannes. 2006. Beyond Globalization: Capitalism, Territoriality and the International Relations of Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Lawson, G., and J. Hobson. 2008. What is History in International Relations? Millennium: Journal of International Studies 37 (2): 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Linklater, Andrew. 1990. Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  48. Matin, Kamran. 2013. Recasting Iranian Modernity: International relations and social change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Matin, Kamran. 2011. Redeeming the Universal: Postcolonialism and the Inner Life of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 19 (2): 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, Stephen. 2012. French Absolutism and Agricultural Capitalism. Historical Materialism 20 (4): 141–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morton, Adam David. 2007. Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  52. Polanyi, Karl. 1977. The Livelihood of Man. In Pearson, ed. W. Harry. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  53. Pomeranz, Kenneth. 2000. The Great Divergence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Post, Charles. 2013. Capitalism, Laws of Motion and Social Relations of Production. Historical Materialism 21 (4): 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Reus-Smit, Christian. 2016. Theory, History and Great Transformations. International Theory 8 (3): 422–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rioux, Sebastian. 2014. The Fiction of Economic Coercion: Political Marxism and the Separation of Theory and History. Historical Materialism 21 (4): 92–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosenberg, Justin. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenberg, Justin. 2013. The “Philosophical Premises” of Uneven and Combined Development. Review of International Studies 39 (3): 569–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sajed, Alina, and Naeem Inayatullah. 2016. On the Perils of Lifting the Weight of Structures: An Engagement with Hobson’s Critique of the Discipline of IR. Postcolonial Studies 19 (2): 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Seth, Sanjay. 2011. Postcolonial Theory and the Critique of Postcolonial Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (1): 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulze, Reinhard. 1996. Was ist die islamische Aufklärung? Die Welt des Islams 36 (3): 276–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shilliam, Robbie. 2009a. The Atlantic as a Vector of Uneven and Combined Development. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shilliam, Robbie. 2009b. German Thought and International Relations: The Rise and Fall of a Liberal Project. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tansel, Cemal Burak. 2015. Deafening Silence? Marxism, International Historical Sociology and the Spectre of Eurocentrism. European Journal of International Relations 21 (1): 76–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Teschke, Benno. 2005. Bourgeois Revolution, State Formation and the Absence of the International. Historical Materialism 13 (2): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Teschke, Benno. 2003. The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics, and the Making of Modern International Relations. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  67. Tickner, Arlene, and Ole Waever (eds.). 2009. International Relations Scholarship Around the World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Van der Pijl, Kees. 2007. Nomads, Empires, States: Modes of Foreign Relations and Political Economy. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  69. Vitalis, Robert. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1997. Eurocentrism and Its Avatars: Dilemmas of Social Science. Sociological Bulletin 46 (1): 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1991. The Pristine Culture of Capitalism: A Historical Essay on Old Regimes and Modern States. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1997. Modernity, Postmodernity or Capitalism? Review of International Political Economy 4 (3): 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 1999. The Origin of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2001. Eurocentric Anti-Eurocentrism. Against the Current 92: 29–35.Google Scholar
  75. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2002a. The Origin of Capitalism: Longer View. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2002b. The Question of Market Dependence. Journal of Agrarian Change 2 (1): 50–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wood, Ellen Meiksins. 2012. The Ellen Meiksins Wood Reader, edited by Larry Patriquin. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  78. Zarakol, Ayse. 2011. After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International RelationsUniversity of KyreniaKyreniaCyprus

Personalised recommendations