Evaluating the durability of brand alliances using Bayesian methods

Original Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the duration of brand alliances (or co-brands), a brand strategy in which two brands are offered as one joint product. Previous research has suggested these alliances are short-lived, but little empirical evidence exists to explore what may drive the longevity of such alliances. The study uses actual market data for 524 brand alliances in 83 product categories of consumer packaged goods during a 13-year period. Controlling for market share, several factors that might influence brand alliance duration are examined: type of alliance, ownership by the same parent company, and the number of relationships. Using a Bayesian hazard model to estimate duration, the results show a brand alliance lasts longer if it is an ingredient brand alliance (rather than licensed) and both brands are owned by the same parent company. Additionally, having more partnerships helps a brand alliance last longer, but too many alliances have a negative effect on staying in the marketplace. The findings suggest that brand managers looking to enter into a brand alliance can anticipate how long the product might last based on these partnership factors.

Keywords

Brand alliances Co-brands New products Bayesian hazard model 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albers, S., F. Wohlgezogen, and E.J. Zajac. 2016. Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective. Journal of Management 42(3): 582–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkes, H.R., and C. Blumer. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35(1): 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. 1990. Two firms, one frontier: On assessing joint venture performance. Sloan Management Review 31(2): 19–31.Google Scholar
  4. Besanko, D., D. Dranove, M. Shanley, and S. Schaefer. 2007. Economics of strategy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Chernev, A., R. Hamilton, and D. Gal. 2011. Competing for consumer identity: Limits to self-expression and the perils of lifestyle branding. Journal of Marketing 75(3): 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi, T.Y., and D.R. Krause. 2006. The supply base and its complexity: Implications for transaction costs, risks, responsiveness, and innovation. Journal of Operations Management 24(5): 637–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decker, C., and A. Baade. 2016. Consumer perceptions of co-branding alliances: Organizational dissimilarity signals and brand fit. Journal of Brand Management 23(6): 648–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desai, K.K., and K.L. Keller. 2002. The effects of ingredient branding strategies on host brand extendibility. Journal of Marketing 66(1): 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Desai, K.K., D.K. Gauri, and Y. Ma. 2014. An empirical investigation of composite product choice. Journal of Retailing 90(4): 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dickinson, S., and T. Heath. 2006. A comparison of qualitative and quantitative results concerning evaluations of co-branded offerings. Journal of Brand Management 13(6): 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyer, J.H., and H. Singh. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gardiner, J.C. 2010. Survival analysis: Overview of parametric, nonparametric and semiparametric approaches and new developments. SAS paper 252-2010.Google Scholar
  13. Grant, R.M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3): 114–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrigan, K.R. 1988. Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries. Management International Review 28: 53–72.Google Scholar
  15. Jap, S.D. 2001. “Pie sharing” in complex collaboration contexts. Journal of Marketing Research 38(1): 86–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keller, K.L. 2013. Strategic brand management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Koschmann, A. 2017. Brand alliances: Growing your pie or stealing your slice? Examining field evidence using causal methods. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness 11(4): 10–19.Google Scholar
  19. Koschmann, A., and D. Bowman. 2016. Evaluating marketplace synergies of brand alliances. Emory University working paper.Google Scholar
  20. Kotler, P., and K.L. Keller. 2012. Marketing management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Larsson, R., L. Bengtsson, K. Henriksson, and J. Sparks. 1998. The interorganizational learning dilemma: Collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 9(3): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Park, S.H., and M.V. Russo. 1996. When competition eclipses cooperation: An event history analysis of joint venture failure. Management Science 42(6): 875–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rao, A.R., L. Qu, and R.W. Ruekert. 1999. Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of Marketing Research 36(2): 258–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schroeder, R.G., K.A. Bates, and M.A. Junttila. 2002. A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management Journal 23(2): 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schultz, E.J. 2014. Uptick in co-branding brings some unusual combos. Retrieved on November 15, 2017 from: http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/uptick-branding-brings-unusual-combos/293817/.
  26. Simonin, B.L., and J.A. Ruth. 1998. Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research 35(1): 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Swaminathan, V., S.R. Reddy, and S.L. Dommer. 2012. Spillover effects of ingredient branded strategies on brand choice: A field study. Marketing Letters 23(1): 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Uggla, H. 2004. The brand association base: A conceptual model for strategically leveraging partner brand equity. Journal of Brand Management 12(2): 105–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van der Lans, R., B. Van den Bergh, and E. Dieleman. 2014. Partner selection in brand alliances: An empirical investigation of the drivers of brand fit. Marketing Science 33(4): 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eastern Michigan University College of BusinessYpsilantiUSA

Personalised recommendations