Psychic dividends of socially responsible investment portfolios
- 59 Downloads
We provide a measure for the value of the non-financial satisfaction that accrues to individuals from investing in a socially responsible manner. This non-financial benefit is referred to as the ‘psychic dividend’ of socially responsible investing (SRI). Using constant relative risk aversion and loss aversion utility functions, we estimate that investors only need to earn a non-financial benefit of two to six basis points per month for them to be indifferent between investing in SRI and non-SRI portfolios. The estimates are similar in both the USA and the UK. The findings show that more investors are likely to benefit from investing in SRI given the decline in the lower bound on the psychic dividend that we observe over time.
KeywordsSocially responsible investment Psychic dividends Portfolio performance
We would like to thank Karen Benson, Robert Durand, Terry Walter and seminar participants at the University of Sydney for helpful feedback.
- Arrow, K.J. 1971. Insurance, risk and resource allocation. In Essays in the theory of risk-bearing, 134–143. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.Google Scholar
- Campbell, J.Y. 1996. Consumption and the stock market: Interpreting international experience. Working paper, NBER no. 5610.Google Scholar
- Friend, I., and M.E. Blume. 1975. The demand for risky assets. The American Economic Review 65: 900–922.Google Scholar
- Geczy, C., R.F. Stambaugh, and D. Levin. 2005. Investing in socially responsible mutual funds. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
- Giovannini, A., and P. Weil. 1989. Risk aversion and intertemporal substitution in the capital asset pricing model. Working paper, NBER no. 2824.Google Scholar
- Gollier, C. 2001. The economics of risk and time. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Kocherlakota, N.R. 1996. The equity premium: It’s still a puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 42–71.Google Scholar
- Levene, H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling 2: 278–292.Google Scholar
- US SIF. 2014. Report on sustainable and responsible investing trends in the United States. The Forum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment.Google Scholar