Polish smart power in terms of NGOs activity and intersections between development aid and public diplomacy

Abstract

Intersections and links between public diplomacy and development aid have so far seldom been a subject of scientific analysis. Development aid as a component of niche diplomacy in the case of medium-sized countries, such as Poland, was eventually noticed by researchers of public diplomacy, and considered in terms of a state’s power. This article presents the results of a study whose goals were to find out in which areas Polish development aid and public diplomacy had common points, what the NGOs’ participation in both fields was, and whether the participation of the non-governmental sector in the implementation of development aid could itself be treated as public diplomacy. Subsequently, the study aimed to establish to what extent those possible common points, supported by NGOs’ activities, could become a Polish specialty, a niche that could be used by Poland in building its smart power. I claimed that public diplomacy is a form of political communication, used in the implementation of foreign policy, in cooperation with non-state actors, and in two contexts: building the image of the state and building its relationships with the international community; Whereas I understand development aid as the entire activity of the donor’s government for supporting developing countries, including humanitarian aid. The aid initiatives are carried out with non-state entities involvement; and the global education as a part of development cooperation is included here too. Referring my study’s assumptions to the concept of J. Pamment concerning three levels of intersections between public diplomacy and development aid, I divided Polish activity into development, humanitarian, and voluntary projects; branding, marketing, promotional and global education activities, and finally the discourse on projects and communication activities. Both public diplomacy and development aid were considered in terms of power. However in the case of development aid, both soft and hard resources were noticed, whereas in public diplomacy—only the soft ones. It prompted me to analyse both areas in terms of smart power, which—according to J.S. Nye’s concept—is understood here as the combination of hard and soft resources. To achieve that I found the methods such as foreign policy analysis (documents content analysis, institutional analysis), case study, desk research, as well as participant observation, to be very useful. It turned out that many areas in which Poland, after joining the European Union in 2004, could build its international social relationships within its smart power have already been taken over by more developed countries. Nevertheless, the results of the study proved that between 2004 and 2012 a successful transformation and democracy promotion became components of Poland’s narrative as a country of smart democratic changes, and Polish NGOs’ significantly participated these processes. Additionally, as a result of my study I proposed the possibility of examining both areas based on NGOs’ activity in terms of Polish smart power, also in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The current multiannual development cooperation programme for 2021-2030 is entitled “Solidarity for development”.

  2. 2.

    Priority countries of Polish Aid between 2004–2012: Afghanistan, Georgia, Moldova, Angola (2004–2011), Iraq (2004–2007), Vietnam (2004–2006), Palestinian Authority (2005–2012), Ukraine (2006–2012), Belarus (2006–2012), Armenia (2011–2012), Azerbaijan (2011–2012), Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan (2012), Tanzania (2007–2008, 2012) and only in 2012: Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenia, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Uganda. The ODA in 2012 was 0.09% DNB—1423 million PLN, of which bilateral assistance was 363 million PLN.

  3. 3.

    Apart from the Eastern Partnership countries, Polish NGOs conducted aid projects in Africa (14%), Latin and South America (3%), the Middle East (4%), Asia (6%), Balkans (2%), and others countries (Russia, Kazakhstan)—3%.

  4. 4.

    Lech Wałęsa was a leader of Solidarity, a pro-democratic movement that led to the end of the communist rule in Poland; Walęsa was the first democratically elected president of Poland from 1900 to 1995, and Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Jan Nowak-Jeziorański was mainly known as “Courier from Warsaw”, the emissary of the Home Army and the Polish Government in Exile in London, the participant of the Warsaw upspring, and the head of the Polish Section of Radio Free Europe.

References

  1. Bagiński, P., K. Czaplicka, and J. Szczyciński. 2009. Międzynarodowa współpraca na rzecz rozwoju. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, C. 2011. The Link between Humanitarian Aid and Public Diplomacy [Online]. http://www.audiencescapes.org/link-between-humanitarian-aid-and-public-diplomacy-indonesia-pakistan-middle-east-development-carnegie-pew

  3. Buzek, J. 2012. Przedmowa do Polityki współpracy rozwojowej Unii Europejskiej, [w:] P. Bagiński, Polityka współpracy rozwojowej Unii Europejskiej w kontekście polskiej prezydencji w Radzie UE w 2011 r. Przewodnik dla posłów i senatorów. Warszawa: Polska Akcja Humanitarna.

  4. Banks, N., D. Hulme, and M. Edwards. 2015. NGOs, states and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort? World Development 66: 707–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chimiak, G. 2016. The growth of non-governmental development organizations in Poland and their cooperation with Polish Aid. Warsaw: IFiS PAN.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cowan, G., and J.N. Cull. 2008. Public diplomacy in a changing world. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Czubek, G. 2002. Social diplomacy. The case of Poland. International activity of Polish NGOs and their dialogue with government. Warszawa: Fundacja Stefana Batorego.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drążkiewicz, E. 2020. Institutionalized dreams: The art of managing foreign aid. Easa Series, vol. 38. New York: Berghahn Books.

  9. Dyplomacja publiczna 2010, MSZ, Warszawa 2011.

  10. Dyplomacja publiczna 2011, MSZ, Warszawa 2012.

  11. Dyplomacja publiczna 2012, MSZ, Warszawa 2013.

  12. Fijałkowska, M., and W. Tworkowski. 2012. Demokracja i rozwój w perspektywie polskich organizacji pozarządowych. Warszawa: Grupa Zagranica.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher, A., and A. Bröckerhoff. 2008. Options for Influence: Global campaigns of persuasion in the new worlds of public diplomacy. London: Counterpoint, British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gilboa, E. 2008. Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huijgh, E. 2012. Public diplomacy in flux: Introducing the domestic dimension. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 7 (4): 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Projekty wspierające rozwój małej i średniej przedsiębiorczości w Gruzji, Projekty wspierające rozwój małej i średniej przedsiębiorczości na Ukrainie, Program stypendialny specjalistycznych Studiów Wschodnich Studium Europy Wschodniej Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, EGO i Fundacja IDEA Rozwoju, Warszawa 2014.

  17. Informacja Ministra Spraw Zagranicznych Włodzimierza Cimoszewicza na temat polskiej polityki zagranicznej w 2003 r.

  18. OECD. 2008. Is it ODA? http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/34086975.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2013.

  19. Jordaan, E. 2003. The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 30 (2): 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 2011. Power and Interdependence, 4th ed. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kierunki promocji Polski do 2015 r. Przyjęte przez Radę Promocji Polski w 2009 r.

  22. Kugiel, P. 2011. Polish Development system: A turning point. Policy Paper No. 13.

  23. Leonard, M., C. Stead, and C. Smewing. 2002. Public diplomacy. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Marczuk, K.P. 2019. Good neighbourhood treaties and public diplomacy. Polish activities in neighbouring states (2007–2014). In Good neighbourhood treaties of Poland. Political, security and social relations, ed. K.P. Marczuk. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Melissen, J. 2005. The new public diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Melissen, J. 2013. Public diplomacy. In The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy, ed. A.F. Cooper, J. Heine, and R. Thakur. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Miller, J. 2009. NGOs and ‘modernization’ and ‘democratization’ of media: Situating media assistance. Global Media and Communication 9 (5): 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. MFA. 2012. Multiannual development cooperation programme 2012–2015. Warsaw: MFA.

  29. Nye, J.S. Jr. 2007. Soft power. Jak osiągnąć sukces w polityce światowej, przeł. J. Zaborowski, Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.

  30. Ociepka, B. 2013. Miękka siła i dyplomacja publiczna Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ociepka, B. 2017. Poland’s new ways of public diplomacy. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Own materials from Polish Humanitarian Action conference entitled Kluczowe wyzwania pomocy humanitarnej i rozwojowej w XXI wieku. 2012. Warszawa. See also: http://www.e-vive.pl/prezydent-bronislaw-komorowski-na-konferencji-pah-pomaganie,pl,21750.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2014.

  33. Pamment, J. 2016. Intersections between public diplomacy and international development, case studies in converging fields. Los Angeles: Figueroa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pierwszy raport: Polska Agenda Demokratyzacyjna. 2014–2015.

  35. Polacy o pomocy rozwojowej. 2012. Warszawa: TNS Polska.

  36. Polska współpraca na rzecz rozwoju. 2003. Raport roczny 2002. Warszawa: MSZ.

  37. Polska współpraca na rzecz rozwoju. 2011. Raport roczny 2010. Warszawa: MSZ.

  38. Pospieszna, P. 2014. Democracy assistance from the third wave. Polish engagement in Belarus and Ukraine. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Priorytety polskiej polityki zagranicznej 2012–2016. 2012. Warszawa: MSZ.

  40. Riddell, R.C. 2007. Does foreign aid really work? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sikorski R. [w:] Polska współpraca na rzecz rozwoju. Raport roczny 2012.

  42. Sobotka, B. 2012. Tworzenie polskiego systemu pomocy rozwojowej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo CeDeWu.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stanowski, Z. 2014. kart historii współpracy polskich organizacji pozarządowych w III RP z partnerami zagranicznymi. Online. http://www.un.org.pl/rozwoj/pr_historia-pl-ngo.php

  44. Stemplowski, R. 2007. Wprowadzenie do analizy polityki zagranicznej. Warszawa: Polski instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Surmacz, B. 2014. „Dyplomacja” organizacji pozarządowych. „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations” 1:49.

  46. Surowiec, P. 2016. Nation branding, public relations and soft power corporatising Poland. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Szondi, G. 2009. Central and eastern European public diplomacy. A transitional perspective on national reputation management. In Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, ed. N. Snow and P.M. Taylor. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Włodkowska-Bagan, A. 2015. Środki i metody polityki zagranicznej państw średniej rangi. Casus Polski po 1989 r [w:] Zając J., Włodkowska-Bagan, Kaczmarski M., Bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe. Polska– Europa–Świat. Księga Jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Ryszardowi Ziębie z okazji czterdziestolecia pracy naukowej. Warszawa: Wydział Dziennikarstwa i Nauk Politycznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

  49. Wnuk., M., P. Kawecka, and J. Bazyl. 2015. Współpraca rozwojowa w debacie sejmowej VII kadencji Sejmu (2011–2015). Warszawa: MamPrawoWiedziec.pl i Grupa Zagranica.

  50. Wygraliśmy przyszłość. 10 lat prezydentury Aleksandra Kwaśniewskiego, Warszawa 2008. Fundacja Aleksandra Kwaśniewskiego „Amicus Europae”. See also: Uczestnicy konferencji „Ku wspólnocie demokracji” u Prezydenta RP, https://www.prezydent.pl/aleksandra-kwasniewskiego/aktualnosci/rok-2000-i-starsze/art,158,1450,uczestnicy-konferencji-ku-wspolnocie-demokracji-u-prezydenta-rp.html. Accessed 03 Feb 2002

  51. Wystąpienie Prezydenta RP Lecha Kaczyńskiego podczas Debaty Ogólnej na 61. sesji Zgromadzenia Ogólnego ONZ 19 września 2006 r. Online. http://www.unic.un.org.pl/aktualnosci

  52. Zaharna, R.S. 2011. Strategic stakeholder engagement in public diplomacy. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Conference, Montreal, March 15–19, 2011.

  53. Zaharna, R.S. 2009. Mapping out a spectrum of public diplomacy initiatives information and relational communication frameworks. In Routledge handbook of public diplomacy, ed. Nancy Snow and Philip M. Taylor. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zatepilina-Monacell, O. 2012. U.S. nonprofit organizations and the U.S. standing abroad. Public Relations Review 38 (3): 471–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zalas-Kamińska, K. 2014. Successful transformation—is it something that Poland can give as an example to less developed countries? In Development and democracy. development ecosystems in V4: The new role for civil society organisations and business beyond 2015. International Conference Booklet, Bratislava 2014. Fundacja Pontis.

  56. Zalas-Kamińska, K. 2015. Społeczeństwo obywatelskie w początkach polskiej pomocy rozwojowej a rozwój dyplomacji publicznej. Zarys problem. In Historia /w/ dyplomacji publicznej, ed. B. Ociepka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

  57. Zalas-Kamińska, K. 2019. Poles in Aid. Polskie organizacje pozarządowe w pomocy rozwojowej a dyplomacja publiczna. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka.

  58. Zbadanie wybranych inicjatyw zrealizowanych w ramach polskiej współpracy rozwojowej udzielanej za pośrednictwem RP w latach 2011–2013: projekty wspierające rozwojów małej i średniej przedsiębiorczości w Gruzji. EGO – Evaluation for Government Organization, Fundacja IDEA Rozwoju, Warszawa 2014.

  59. Zbadanie wybranych inicjatyw zrealizowanych w ramach polskiej współpracy rozwojowej udzielane za pośrednictwem Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych RP w latach 2012- 2014, w tym wybranych działań Fundacji Solidarności Międzynarodowej prowadzonych w ramach zadań zlecanych przez Ministra Spraw Zagranicznych na mocy Ustawy o współpracy rozwojowej oraz programów i projektów na rzecz Mołdawii, Ecorys Polska Sp. z o.o., Warszawa 2015.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katarzyna Zalas-Kamińska.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no conflict of interest, and the author has no financial or personal relationship with a third party whose interests could be influenced by the article’s content.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zalas-Kamińska, K. Polish smart power in terms of NGOs activity and intersections between development aid and public diplomacy. Place Brand Public Dipl (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00198-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Polish aid
  • Public diplomacy
  • Ngos
  • Democracy promotion
  • Successful transformation