City citizenship behavior and participation in promotion

Abstract

Over the past few years, residents' participation in public matters has gained increased importance along with the involvement of internal stakeholder groups in the decision-making process. This trend has also been embodied across city branding theory and practice. Therefore, the paper focuses on residents' role as citizens. The main objective of the study is to understand citizens' participation in local matters and the relationship between citizenship behavior and involvement in the city brand promotion practice. The study is based on the survey data (CAWI) acquired from citizens (n = 503) from Poznan, Poland. According to the research findings, citizens with a high level of so-called citizenship behavior are likely to also engage in the city branding process, namely in the promotion. The findings also highlight relationship between citizens' age and participation intensity. The survey results are valuable to local government authorities. The findings also suggest they should treat the residents as the most relevant stakeholders and encourage citizen participation by stimulating the feeling of citizenship. The study empirically proves that citizen participation in real-life directly correlates to their involvement online. The concept of citizenship behavior is adapted to the specificity of a CEE market and proved to be a reliable measurement tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aitken, R., and A. Campelo. 2011. The four Rs of place branding. Journal of Marketing Management 27 (9–10): 913–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, M., and P. Ekman. 2009. Ambassador networks and place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development 2 (1): 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anholt, S. 2008. Place branding: Is it marketing, or ’isn’t it? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 4: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25: 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashworth, G., and M. Kavaratzis. 2018. The roles of branding in public administration and place management: Possibilities and pitfalls. In The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe, ed. V.T. Ongaro. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boisen, M., K. Terlouw, P. Groote, and O. Couwenberg. 2018. Reframing place promotion, place marketing, and place branding - moving beyond conceptual confusion. Cities 80: 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bovaird, T., and E. Löffler. 2003. Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences 69 (3): 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun, E., M. Kavaratzis, and S. Zenker. 2013. My city – my brand: The different roles of residents in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development 6 (1): 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bryson, J.M., K.S. Quick, C.S. Slotterback, and B.C. Crosby. 2013. Designing public participation processes. Public Management Review 73 (1): 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burr, A., G. Caro, and L. Sullivan. 2002. Productive aging and civic participation. Journal of Aging Studies 16 (1): 87–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castillo, M. 2015. Reflections on participatory budgeting in New York city. The Innovation Journal 20 (2): 2.

    Google Scholar 

  12. CBOS. 2018. https://www.cbos.pl/EN/home/home.php. Accessed June 2020.

  13. CBOS. 2019. http://obserwatorium.miasta.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Partycypacja-publiczna_raport-o-stanie-polskich-miast-Martela-Pistelok_Obserwatorium-Polityki-Miejskiej-irmir.pdf. Accessed September 2020.

  14. Cleave, E., G. Arku, R. Sadler, and E. Kyeremeh. 2017. Place marketing, place branding, and social media: Perspectives of municipal practitioners. Growth and Change 48: 1012–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Comrey, A.L., and H.B. Lee. 1992. A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eshuis, J., E. Braun, and E. Klijn. 2013. Place marketing as governance strategy: An assessment of obstacles in place marketing and their effects on attracting target groups. Public Administration Review 73 (3): 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eshuis, J., and J. Edwards. 2013. Branding the city: The democratic legitimacy of a new mode of governance. Urban Studies 50 (5): 1066–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Eshuis, J., E.-H. Klijn, and E. Braun. 2014. Place marketing and citizen participation: Branding as strategy to address the emotional dimension of policy making? International Review of Administrative Sciences 80 (1): 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. European Commission. 2001. European Governance. A white paper. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. (2001). European Commission https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/file/21887/download_en?token=BPoWs-3g. Accessed June 2020.

  20. Eurostat. 2015. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Living_conditions_in_Europe_-_social_participation_and_integration#Social_participation. Accessed June 2020.

  21. Florek, M. 2014. Kapitał marki miasta zorientowany na konsumenta - źródła i pomiar. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Forester, J.F. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fung, A. 2006. Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review 66: 66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia, M. 2006. Citizenship practices and urban Governance in European cities. Urban Studies 43 (4): 745–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanna, S., and J. Rowley. 2013. A practitioner-led strategic place brand-management model. Journal of Marketing Management 29 (15–16): 1782–2181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanna, S., and J. Rowley. 2015. Rethinking strategic place branding in the digital age. In Rethinking place branding comprehensive brand development for cities and regions, ed. M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, and G. Ashworth, 85–100. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Herezniak, M., and M. Florek. 2018. Citizen involvement, place branding and mega events: Insights from Expo host cities. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 14 (2): 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Heywood, A. 1994. Political ideas and concepts. New York: St. ’Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Houghton, J., and A. Stevens. 2011. City branding and stakeholder engagement. In City branding, ed. K. Dinnie. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huttunen, J., and H. Christensen. 2020. Engaging the millennials: The “citizens” initiative in Finland. YOUNG 28 (2): 175–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Insch, A., and M. Florek. 2008. A great place to live, work and play: Conceptualising place satisfaction in the case of a city’s residents. Journal of Place Management and Development 1 (2): 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kavaratzis, M. 2004. From city marketing to city branding: Towards a theoretical framework for developing city brands. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 1: 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kavaratzis, M. 2009. Cities and their brands: Lessons from corporate branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 5: 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kavaratzis, M. 2012. From necessary evilto necessity: “Stakeholders” involvement in place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development 5 (1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kemp, E., C. Childers, and H. Williams Kim. 2012. Place branding: Creating self-brand connections and brand advocacy. Journal of Product & Brand Management 21 (7).

  36. Klamut, R. 2015. Kwestionariusz aktywności obywatelskiej (KAO) – narzędzie do badania różnych rodzajów aktywności obywatelskiej. Psychologia Społeczna 10 (32): 68–83.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Klijn, E. 2012. Public management and governance: A comparison of two paradigms to deal with modern complex problems. In The handbook of governance, ed. D.L. Faur, 201–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Klijn, E., J. Edelenbos, and B. Steijn. 2010. Trust in governance networks-its impact and outcomes. Administration and Society 42 (2): 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Klijn, H., J. Eshuis, and E. Braun. 2012. The influence of stakeholder involvement on the effectiveness of place branding. Public Management Review 14 (4): 499–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kline, R.B. 2010. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kroll, A., M.I. Neshkova, and S. Pandey. 2017. Spillover effects from customer to citizen orientation. Administration & Society 51: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lister, R. 1998. Citizen in action: Citizenship and community development in a Northern Ireland context. Community Development Journal 33: 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Merrilees, B., D. Miller, and C. Herington. 2012. Multiple stakeholders and multiple city brand meanings. European Journal of Marketing 46 (7/8): 1032–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Michels, A., and L. Graaf. 2010. Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies 36 (4): 477–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ministry of Infrastructure and Development. 2015. Internet source: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WMP20150001235/O/M20151235.pdf.

  46. Nunnally, J., and I. Bernstein. 1994. The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory 3: 248–292.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Organ, D. 1988. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Paganoni, M. 2015. Introduction — City branding and new media: Linguistic, discursive and semiotic aspects. In City branding and new media: Linguistic perspectives, discursive strategies and multimodality, ed. M. Paganoni. London: Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Podsakoff, P.M., S.B. MacKenzie, J.B. Paine, and D.G. Bachrach. 2000. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management 26 (3): 513–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Priporas, C., N. Stylos, and I. Kamenidou. 2019. City image, city brand personality and generation Z residents’ life satisfaction under economic crisis: Predictors of city-related social media engagement. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.05.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Quick, K.S., and J. Bryson. 2016. Public participation. In Handbook on theories of governance, ed. C. Ansell and J. Torfing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rehmet, J., and K. Dinnie. 2013. Citizen brand ambassadors: Motivations and perceived effects. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 2: 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Roberts, N. 2008. The age of direct citizen participation. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rowe, G., and L. Frewer. 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25 (1): 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sevin, E. 2015. Branding cities in the age of social media: A comparative assessment of local government performance. In Social media and local governments. Public administration and information technology, ed. M. Sobaci. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stubbs, W., and G. Warnaby. 2015. Rethinking place branding from a practice perspective: Working with stakeholders. In Rethinking place branding, ed. M. Kavaratzis, G. Warnaby, and G. Ashworth, 101–118. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stylidis, D., J. Sit, and A. Biran. 2016. An exploratory study of residents’ perception of place image: The case of kavala. Journal of Travel Research 55 (5): 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Taecharungroj, V. 2016. City ambassadorship and citizenship behaviours: Modelling resident behaviours that help cities grow. Journal of Place Management and Development 9 (3): 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Torfing, J., and P. Triantafillou. 2013. What’s in a name? Grasping new public governance as a political-administrative system. International Review of Public Administration 18 (2): 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. UN. 2018. www.un.org. https://www.un.org/en/events/citiesday/assets/pdf/the_worlds_cities_in_2018_data_booklet.pdf. Accessed June 2020.

  62. Vargo, S.L., and R.F. Lusch. 2004. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing 68 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Verba, S.S. 1995. Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wang, X., and M. Wan Wart. 2007. When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review 67 (2): 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Warnaby, G. 2009. Towards a service-dominant place marketing logic. Marketing Theory 9 (4): 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yu, E., and J. Kim. 2020. “The relationship between self-city brand connection, city brand experience, and city brand ambassadors,” sustainability. MDPI, Open Access Journal 12 (3): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zavattaro, S. 2015. Place brand identity: An exploratory analysis of three deep south states. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior 18 (4): 405–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zenker S., and E. Braun. 2010. The place brand centre–a conceptual approach for place branding and place brand management. 39th European Marketing Academy Conference ed. 2010.

  69. Zenker, S., and C. Erfgen. 2014. Let them do the work: A participatory place branding approach. Journal of Place Management and Development 7 (3): 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zenker, S., and S. Petersen. 2014. An integrative theoretical model for improving resident-city identification. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (3): 715–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zenker, S., and N. Rutter. 2014. Is satisfaction the key? The role of citizen satisfaction, place attachment and place brand attitude on positive citizenship behavior. Cities 38: 11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zenker, S., and A. Seigis. 2012. Respect and the city: The mediating role of respect in citizen participation. Journal of Place Management and Development 5 (1): 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The research was supported by National Science Centre, Poland, No.2019/33/N/HS4/02004.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maia Maziashvili.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table

Table 6 Demographics of respondents

6.

Appendix 2

See Table

Table 7 Correlations between "City Citizenship Behavior" (CCB) and "Participation in Promotion"

7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maziashvili, M., Kowalik, I. City citizenship behavior and participation in promotion. Place Brand Public Dipl (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00194-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Citizen participation
  • City branding
  • Citizenship behavior
  • Online city promotion