The interplay between nationalism and public diplomacy: Examining nationalist publics’ communicative behaviors during an international dispute

Original Article
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

Nationalism is an ideology commonly shared amongst members of a nation who feel that their nation is superior and should dominate others; thus, it could be detrimental to the purpose of public diplomacy to promote mutual understanding between nations. To better understand the interplay between nationalism and public diplomacy, this study examines the causes, expressions, and consequences of nationalism. Using the situational theory of problem solving (STOPS) as an analytical framework, a case study is conducted to examine the association between the extent of news coverage and online discussions surrounding a territorial dispute between the Chinese and Japanese Governments. Several findings are made, including that: (a) there is a positive relationship between the amount of news coverage and online discussions surrounding the dispute, (b) nationalist publics interpreted the international dispute as affecting them personally (i.e., displaying international issue personalization effects), and (c) nationalist publics proposed using collective approaches to cope with the dispute. Implications of the findings for public diplomacy are discussed.

Keywords

Communicative behaviors Nationalism Public diplomacy Situational theory of problem solving 

References

  1. Ackland, R., and M. O’Neil. 2011. Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement. Social Networks 33 (3): 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhter, S. 2007. Globalization, expectations model of economic nationalism, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing 24 (3): 142–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldoory, L., and J. Grunig. 2012. The rise and fall of hot-issue publics: Relationships that develop from media coverage of events and crises. International Journal of Strategic Communication 6 (1): 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. 2006. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of Nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Balabanis, G., A. Diamantopoulos, R. Mueller, et al. 2001. The impact of nationalism, patriotism and internationalism on consumer ethnocentric tendencies. Journal of International Business Studies 32 (1): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birkland, T. 1998. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calhoun, C. 1997. Nationalism and the public sphere. In Public and private in thought and practice: Perspectives on a grand dichotomy. Morality and society, ed. J. Weintraub, and K. Kumar. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, D. 2012. ‘Toyota China’ changes name to ‘China Toyota’. The China Money Report. http://www.thechinamoneyreport.com/2012/11/28/toyota-china-changes-name-to-china-toyota/.
  9. Coombs, W. 2007. Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review 10 (3): 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dinnie, K., and A. Lio. 2010. Enhancing China’s image in Japan: Developing the nation brand through public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6 (3): 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dong, L., and K. Tian. 2009. The use of Western brands in asserting Chinese national identity. Journal of Consumer Research 36 (3): 504–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Druckman, D. 1994. Nationalism, patriotism, and group loyalty: A social psychological perspective. Mershon International Studies Review 38 (1): 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finlay, C., and X. Xin. 2010. Public diplomacy games: A comparative study of American and Japanese responses to the interplay of nationalism, ideology and Chinese soft power strategies around the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Sport in Society 13 (5): 876–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzpatrick, K. 2007. Advancing the new public diplomacy: A public relations perspective. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2 (3): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gellner, E. 2008. Nations and nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Grunig, J. 1997. A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In Public relations research: An international perspective, ed. D. Moss, T. MacManus, and D. Vercic, 3–48. International Thomson Business: London, UK.Google Scholar
  17. Grunig, J. 2003. Constructing public relations theory and practice. In Communication, another kind of horse race: Essays honoring Richard F. Carter, ed. B. Dervin, S. Chaffee, and L. Foreman-Wernet, 85–115. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  18. Han, G., and A. Zhang. 2009. Starbucks is forbidden in the Forbidden City: Blog, circuit of culture and informal public relations campaign in China. Public Relations Review 35 (4): 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang, Y. 2012. Cyber-nationalism in China: Challenging Western media portrayals of interest censorship in China. Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, I. and Shanker, T. 2012. Beijing mixes messages over anti-Japan protests. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/17/world/asia/anti-japanese-protests-over-disputed-islands-continue-in-china.html?_r=0.
  21. Kim, J.-N., and J. Grunig. 2011. Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication 61 (1): 120–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, J.-N., and L. Ni. 2013. Two types of public relations problems and integrating formative and evaluative research: A review of research programs within the behavioral, strategic management paradigm. Journal of Public Relations Research 25 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, J.-N., H. Shen, and S. Morgan. 2011. Information behaviors and problem chain recognition effect: Applying situational theory of problem solving in organ donation issues. Health Communication 26 (2): 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, J.-N., L. Ni, S.-H. Kim, and J.R. Kim. 2012. What makes people hot? Applying the situational theory of problem solving to hot-issue publics. Journal of Public Relations Research 24 (2): 144–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, J. 2011. Chinese nationalism, a false alarm for Korea—the case of the Beijing Olympics. East Asia 28 (4): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, S., J.-N. Kim, L. Tam, and G.T. Kim. 2015. Inquiring into activist publics in chronic environmental issues: Use of the mutual-gains approach for breaking a deadlock. Journal of Public Affairs 15 (4): 404–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koh, Y. 2012. Territorial fashionistas: Uniqlo staff in China add Senkaku spin to style tips. Wall Street Journal. http://blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2012/09/19/territorial-fashionistas-uniqlo-staff-in-china-add-senkaku-spin-to-style-tips/.
  28. Kosterman, R., and S. Feshbach. 1989. Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology 10 (2): 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, S. 2002. Territorial disputes among Japan, China and Taiwan concerning the Senkaku Islands. International Boundaries Research Unit: Boundary and Territory Briefing 3 (7): 1–37.Google Scholar
  30. MacKinnon, R. 2006. How censorship works in China: A brief overview. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/reports/2006/china0806/5.htm.
  31. Ni, L., and J.-N. Kim. 2009. Classifying publics: Communication behaviors and problem-solving characteristics in controversial issues. International Journal of Strategic Communication 3 (4): 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pál, N. 2009. From Starbucks to Carrefour: Consumer boycotts, nationalism and taste in contemporary China. Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 6 (2): 1–26.Google Scholar
  33. Pye, L. 2013. How China’s nationalism was Shanghaied. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 29: 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rieff, D. 2006. Globalization 2.0. The New York Times Magazine, 6th March. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/26/magazine/326wwln_lede.2.html?_r=0.
  35. Schlenker, A., and J. Blatter. 2013. Conceptualizing and evaluating (new) forms of citizenship between nationalism and cosmopolitanism. Democratization 347: 1–26.Google Scholar
  36. Stokes, B. 2016. Hostile neighbors: China vs. Japan. Pew Research Center, 13th September. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/09/13/hostile-neighbors-china-vs-japan/.
  37. Szondi, G. 2010. From image management to relationship building: A public relations approach to nation branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 6 (4): 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. The Asahi Shimbun. 2012. Toyota to suspend production at largest Chinese plant for one week. 16th October. http://ajw.asahi.com/article/economy/business/AJ201210160072.
  39. The Economist. 2013. The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands: Dangerous shoals. 19th January. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21569740-risks-clash-between-china-and-japan-are-risingand-consequences-could-be.
  40. Veil, S., J. Reno, R. Freihaut, et al. 2014. Online activists vs. Kraft foods: A case of social media hijacking. Public Relations Review 41 (1): 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang, J. 2005. Consumer nationalism and corporate reputation management in the global era. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 10 (3): 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang, J. 2006. The politics of goods: A case study of consumer nationalism and media discourse in contemporary China. Asian Journal of Communication 16 (2): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang, J., and Z. Wang. 2007. The political symbolism of business. Journal of Communication Management 11 (2): 134–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yin, R. 1981. The case study as a serious research strategy. Science Communication 3 (1): 97–114.Google Scholar
  45. Zhao, S. 2013. Foreign policy implications of Chinese nationalism revisited: The strident turn. Journal of Contemporary China 22 (82): 535–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhou, Y., and P. Moy. 2007. Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication 57 (1): 79–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Advertising, Marketing and Public RelationsQueensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Brian Lamb School of CommunicationPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations