Advertisement

Business Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 60–65 | Cite as

R-star wars: the phantom menace

  • James B. Bullard
Original Article

Abstract

The natural real rate of interest has been on a declining path for the past 30 years. I present a regime-switching analysis of the natural rate, which suggests that the current low levels are likely to persist in the near future. I identify a high global demand for safe assets as the most important factor in keeping the natural rate low. I conclude that the current low levels of the policy rate are generally appropriate, with some upside risk, and that forward guidance should be characterized by a flat policy rate path.

Keywords

Natural real interest rate Markov switching Monetary policy rules 

JEL Classification

C24 E47 E58 

References

  1. Borio, Claudio, Piti Disyatat, Mikael Juselius, and Phurichai Rungcharoenkitkul. 2017. Why so low for so long? A long-term view of real interest rates. Bank for International Settlements Working Papers No. 685.Google Scholar
  2. Bullard, James. 2016. The St. Louis Fed’s new characterization of the outlook for the U.S. economy. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Announcement. https://www.stlouisfed.org/~/media/Files/PDFs/Bullard/papers/Regime-Switching-Forecasts-17June2016.pdf?la=en.
  3. Cúrdia, Vasco. 2015. Why so slow? A gradual return for interest rates. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Economic Letter No. 2015–32.Google Scholar
  4. Del Negro, Marco, Domenico Giannone, Marc Giannoni, and Andrea Tambalotti, 2017. Safety, liquidity and the natural rate of interest. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Spring: 235–294.Google Scholar
  5. Dupor, William. 2015. Liftoff and the natural rate of interest. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. On the Economyhttps://www.stlouisfed.org/on-the-economy/2015/june/liftoff-and-the-natural-rate-of-interest.
  6. Gomme, Paul, B. Ravikumar, and Peter Rupert. 2011. The return to capital and the business cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics 14 (2): 262–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2010.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gomme, Paul, B. Ravikumar, and Peter Rupert. 2015. Secular stagnation and returns on capital. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Economic Synopses 2015, No. 19.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, James D. 1989. A new approach to the analysis of nonstationary time series and the business cycle. Econometrica 57 (2): 357–384.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holston, Kathryn, Thomas Laubach, and John C. Williams. 2017. Measuring the natural rate of interest: International trends and determinants. Journal of International Economics 108 (S1): S59–S75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2017.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Homer, Sidney, and Richard Sylla. 2005. A History of Interest Rates, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Kahn, James A., and Robert W. Rich. 2006. Tracking productivity in real time. Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Current Issues in Economics and Finance 12 (8): 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. Kahn, James A., and Robert W. Rich. 2007. Tracking the new economy: Using growth theory to detect changes in trend productivity. Journal of Monetary Economics 54 (6): 1670–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, Chang-Jin, and Charles R. Nelson. 1999. State-space Models with Regime Switching. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lagos, Ricardo. 2010. Asset prices and liquidity in an exchange economy. Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (8): 913–930.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laubach, Thomas, and John C. Williams. 2003. Measuring the natural rate of interest. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monge-Naranjo, Alexander, Juan M. Sánchez, and Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis. 2015. Natural Resources and Global Misallocation. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Working Paper No. 2015-036A.Google Scholar
  17. Rachel, Lucasz, and Thomas D. Smith. 2015. Secular Drivers of the Global Real Interest Rate. Bank of England. Staff Working Paper No. 571.Google Scholar
  18. Taylor, John B. 1993. Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-L.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Taylor, John B. 1999. A historical analysis of monetary policy rules. In Monetary policy rules, ed. John B. Taylor, 319–348. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Williams, John C. 2017. Three questions on r-star. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. Economic Letter No. 2017-05.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Association for Business Economics 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Reserve Bank of St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations