WORKING WITH RELIGION: OFTEN NEGLECTED ASPECTS OF TRANSFERENCE AND COUNTERTRANSFERENCE

Abstract

The author contends that psychoanalytic theory has generally presented religious beliefs as developmentally immature or pathological. This viewpoint has resulted in a neglect of religion on the part of psychoanalysts and an avoidance of their religious life by patients. Even though there has been an evolution from the traditional Freudian foundational approach to religion as an “illusion” to the inclusion of psychoanalytical training within some Christian institutes and attributions that psychoanalysis, itself, is a religion, religious beliefs should be included in psychotherapy because they can become involved in transference and countertransference issues in ways that are ignored if religious issues are not discussed in therapy. The author presents clinical material to illustrate this problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arlow, J. A. (1951). A psychoanalytic study of a religious initiation rite: Bar mitzvah. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 6, 353–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Black, D. M. (1993). What sort of a thing is a religion? A view from object-relations theory. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 74, 613–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, M. (2009). An old god awakens briefly. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 37, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fairbairn, R. (1940). Schizoid factors in the personality. In An object relations theory of personality. (pp. 3–27). New York: Basic Books. 1952.

  5. Freud, S. (1907). Obsessive actions and religious practices (Vol. 9, pp. 115–127). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freud, S. (1912–1913).Totem and taboo. Standard edition, Vol. 13, (pp. 1–161). London: Hogarth.

  7. Freud, S. (1927). The future of an illusion (Vol. 21, pp. 3–56). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Freud, S. (1928). A religious experience (Vol. 21, pp. 169–171). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freud, S. (1930). Civilization and its discontents (Vol. 21, pp. 57–146). London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDargh, H. J. (1983). Psychoanalytic object relations theory and the study of religion: On faith and the imaging of god. Latham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meissner, W. W. (1996). The pathology of beliefs and the beliefs of pathology. In E. P. Shafranske (Ed.), Religion and the clinical practice of psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O’Connell, A. (2009). “Man is broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue”. How religion can enrich an analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 37, 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ostow, M. (1988). Four entered the garden: Normative religion versus illusion. Conservative Judaism, 40, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parsons, W. B. (1999). The enigma of the oceanic feeling: revisioning the psychoanalytic theory of mysticism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rizzuto, A.-M. (1979). The birth of the living god: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rizzuto, A.-M. (2002). Believing and personal and religious beliefs: Psychoanalytic considerations. Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 25, 433–463.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sorenson, R. L. (2004). Minding spirituality. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spero, M. H. (1988). Countertransference envy toward the religious patient. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 43–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spero, M. H. (1992). Religious objects as psychological structures: A critical integration of objection relations theory, psychotherapy, and Judaism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Strean, H. S. (1994). Psychotherapy with the orthodox Jew. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariam Cohen.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Mariam Cohen, M.D., Psy.D., Ph.D, is a retired psychiatrist, psychoanalyst in Scottsdale, Arizona.

Address Correspondence to Dr. Mariam Cohen, 4810 East Andora Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85254, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, M. WORKING WITH RELIGION: OFTEN NEGLECTED ASPECTS OF TRANSFERENCE AND COUNTERTRANSFERENCE. Am J Psychoanal 79, 103–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231-019-09174-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • transference
  • countertransference
  • religion
  • working with religious issues