The Evolution of the Federal Reserve Swap Lines since 1962

Abstract

This paper describes the evolution of the Federal Reserve’s swap lines from their inception in 1962 as a mechanism to forestall claims on U.S gold reserves under Bretton Woods to a means of extending emergency dollar liquidity during the Great Recession. It describes the Federal Reserve’s successes and failures and argues that swaps calm crisis situations by both supplementing foreign countries’ dollar reserves and by signaling central-bank cooperation. The paper shows how swaps exposed the Federal Reserve to conditionality and raised fears that they bypassed the Congressional appropriations process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Hooyman (1993) for an early survey of central bank uses of swaps.

  2. 2.

    The U.S. Treasury has established swap lines with foreign monetary authorities on an ad hoc basis since 1936. Typically the Treasury sets up these lines with developing countries to provide short-term bridge loans in anticipation of financing from other sources.

  3. 3.

    Coombs (1976) provides an estimate of the U.S. gold export point.

  4. 4.

    The dollar was the key vehicle currency. When speculators shifted funds, say, out of British pounds and into Swiss francs, they would sell pounds for dollars and dollars for francs, leaving the SNB with dollars.

  5. 5.

    The Swiss franc line with the BIS existed to overcome Swiss laws that limited the SNB’s lending to foreign central banks. This included swap amounts.

  6. 6.

    Early central-bank swaps were usually done on a “flat” basis. The spot and forward exchange rates were equal to the rate then quoted in the spot market. The interest rates paid to the creditor country and on any balance held by the debtor country were equal and typically based on U.S. Treasury bill yields.

  7. 7.

    The Federal Reserve’s authority for foreign-exchange operations was unclear in the 1960s and 1970s. The Monetary Control Act of 1980 gave the Federal Reserve authority to invest its foreign-exchange holdings in foreign-government securities, which implied Congressional consent for the Federal Reserve’s various foreign-currency operations. On the Federal Reserve’s legal authority, see Todd (1992).

  8. 8.

    Roosa bonds were nonmarketable foreign-currency-denominated bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury.

  9. 9.

    This total excludes BIS drawings.

  10. 10.

    The U.S. Treasury had outstanding obligations of nearly $1.8 billion (Task Force Paper #10, 1990a, p. 21).

  11. 11.

    During Bretton Woods, the United States generally viewed currency intervention as the responsibility of foreign central banks. Although the U.S. monetary authorities occasionally intervened, their only obligation was to buy and sell gold.

  12. 12.

    Risk-sharing agreements ended in December 1980. Henceforth countries drawing on the swap assumed all of the risk.

  13. 13.

    Although the Board of Governors discussed intervention in terms of a portfolio-balance mechanism, traders at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s foreign-exchange desk only referred to intervention’s “psychological” effect on the market. The modern expectations channels were not prominent until the early 1980s. Edison (1993), Baillie, Humpage, and Osterberg (2000) and Sarno and Taylor (2001) discuss the transmission channels for sterilized intervention.

  14. 14.

    The Treasury issued foreign-currency-denominated Carter bonds to borrow funds for intervention. Carter bonds were marketable, whereas Roosa bonds were nonmarketable.

  15. 15.

    The Bank of Sweden was the last foreign central bank to draw on the line in February 1981. The Bank repaid the drawing in April 1981. The BIS drew once overnight on its line in 1982.

  16. 16.

    These Federal Reserve-Treasury swaps are typically described as the Federal Reserve’s warehousing facility, through which the Federal Reserve temporarily warehouses foreign exchange for dollars (Bordo, Humpage, and Schwartz, 2015, chapter 6).

  17. 17.

    Following the 11 September 2001 terrorists’ attacks, the Federal Reserve set up similar swap lines with the European Central Bank ($50 billion) and the Bank of England ($30 billion), and expanded its existing swap with the Bank of Canada ($10 billion). The lines expired after 30 days (Bulletin December, 2001, p. 761).

  18. 18.

    On foreign-central-bank access, see Prasad (2014, pp. 207–209).

References

  1. Adams, Donald B. and Dale W. Henderson, 1983, “Definition and Measurement of Exchange Market Intervention,” Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Staff Studies No. 126.

  2. Aizenman, Joshua and Gurnain Kaur Pasricha, 2010, “Selective Swap Arrangements and the Global Financial Crisis: Analysis and Interpretation,” International Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 353–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baillie, Richard, Owen Humpage, and William Osterberg, 2000, “Intervention from an Information Perspective,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 10, No. 3–4, pp. 407–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Board of Governors. 1976a, Banking and Monetary Statistics 1941—1970 (Washington DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  5. Board of Governors. 1976b, Annual Statistical Digest 1971–1975 (Washington DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  6. Board Staff. 1967, “Reciprocal Swap Agreement with Venezuela,” February 28 (unpublished; Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  7. Bordo, Michael D. and Owen F. Humpage, 2014, “Federal Reserve Policy and Bretton Woods,” Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper No. 14–07.

  8. Bordo, Michael D., Owen F. Humpage and Anna J. Schwartz, 2012, “The Federal Reserve as an Informed Foreign Exchange Trader: 1973–1995,” International Journal and Central Banking, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bordo, Michael D., Owen F. Humpage and Anna J. Schwartz, 2015, Strained Relations, US Foreign-Exchange Operations and Monetary Policy in the Twentieth Century (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Broaddus, J. Alfred and Marvin Goodfriend, 1996, “Foreign Exchange Operations and the Federal Reserve,” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. [Bulletin], “Treasury and Federal Reserve Foreign Exchange Operations,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, various issues (Washington DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  12. Coombs, Charles A., 1976, The Arena of International Finance (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Edison, Hali, 1993, “The Effectiveness of Central Bank Intervention: A Survey of the Literature after 1982,” Special Papers in International Economics No. 18 (Princeton University).

  14. Fisher, Peter, Donald Kohn, and Edwin Truman, 1996, “Issues Related to Review of System’s Swap Arrangements,” March 14 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  15. Fleming, Michael J. and Nicholas J. Klagge, 2010, “The Federal Reserve’s Foreign Exchange Swap Lines,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  16. [FOMC Memorandum], Federal Open Market Committee, “Memorandum of Discussion of the Federal Open Market Committee,” various issues (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System). www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomc_historical.htm.

  17. [FOMC Transcripts], Federal Open Market Committee, Transcripts of the Federal Open Market Committee, various issues (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System). www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomc_historical.htm.

  18. Goldberg, Linda S., Craig Kennedy, and Jason Miu, 2010, Central Bank Dollar Swap Lines and Overseas Dollar Funding Costs, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report, No. 429 (February).

  19. Goodfriend, Marvin, 1994, “Why We Need an ‘Accord’ for Federal Reserve Credit Policy: A Note,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 572–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodfriend, Marvin, 2013, “Policy Debates at the Federal Open Market Committee: 1993–2002,” in The Origins, History, and Future of the Federal Reserve System: A Return to Jekyll Island, ed. by Michael D. Bordo and William Roberds (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holmes, Alan.R. and Scott E. Pardee, 1978, “Dr. Gleske’s Proposals to Amend Swap Agreement,” September 26 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  22. Hooyman, Catherine J., 1993, “The Use of Foreign Exchange Swaps by Central Banks: A Survey,” IMF Working Papers 93/64.

  23. Makin, John H., 1971, “Swaps and Roosa Bonds as an Index of the Costs of Cooperation in the ‘Crisis Zone’,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maroni, Yves, 1994, “History of the Reciprocal Currency (“Swap”) Agreement between the Bank of Mexico and the Federal Reserve System,” March 11 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  25. McGuire, Patrick and Götz von Peter, 2009, “The US Dollar Shortage in Global Banking,” Bank for International Settlements Quarterly Review, March, pp. 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moessner, Richhild and William A. Allen, 2010, “Central Bank Co-operation and International Liquidity in the Financial Crisis of 2008–9,” Bank for International Settlements Working Papers No. 310, May.

  27. Obstfeld, Maurice, Jay C. Shambaugh, and Alan M. Taylor, 2009, “Financial Instability, Reserves, and Central Bank Swap Lines in the Panic of 2008,” American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, Vol. 99, No. 2, pp. 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Prasad, Eswar S., 2014, The Dollar Trap: How the U.S. Dollar Tightened Its Grip on Global Finance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reynolds, John E., 1969, “Ireland as a Candidate for a Reciprocal Currency Arrangement with the Federal Reserve,” December 16 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  30. Sarno, Lucio and Mark P. Taylor, 2001, “The Official Intervention in the Foreign-Exchange Market: Is It Effective and, If So, How Does It Work?,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 839–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Solomon, Robert, 1971, “Use of Swap Network,” August 13 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  32. Task Force on System Foreign Currency Operations. 1990a, “Profits and Losses in U.S. Foreign-Currency Operations,” Paper #10, January 8 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  33. Task Force on System Foreign Currency Operations. 1990b, “Reciprocal Currency Arrangements (The “Swap” Network),” Paper #9, January 24 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  34. Task Force on System Foreign Currency Operations. 1990c, “U.S. Official Holdings of Foreign Currencies,” Paper #8, January 16 (unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System).

  35. Todd, Walker F., 1992, “Disorderly Markets: The Law, History, and Economics of the Exchange Stabilization Fund and U.S. Foreign-Exchange Market Intervention,” in Research in Financial Services: Private and Public Policy, Vol. 4. ed. by George G. Kaufman (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Triffin, Robert, 1960, Gold and the Dollar Crisis: The Future of Convertibility (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

*Michael D. Bordo is a professor of economics and director of the Center for Monetary and Financial History at Rutgers University, a National Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research, and a member of the Shadow Open Market Committee. Owen F. Humpage is a Senior Economic Advisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Anna J. Schwartz who passed away in June 2012 was a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41308-017-0034-4.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bordo, M., Humpage, O. & Schwartz, A. The Evolution of the Federal Reserve Swap Lines since 1962. IMF Econ Rev 63, 353–372 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2015.11

Download citation

JEL Classifications

  • F3
  • N2