Advertisement

Subjectivity

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 79–100 | Cite as

Artefacts that talk: Mediating technologies as multistable signs and tools

  • Cathrine Hasse
Original Article

Abstract

The article takes up the notion of artefacts as tools and signs and discusses how socially assistive robots impact professional work life and professional identities as multistable active change agents. It argues for a multistable understanding of tools as signs, building on a combination of post-phenomenology and cultural–historical activity theory to capture the embodied, cultural and historical learning processes initiated when technologies engage with humans in professional work life. Moreover, the article invokes the concept of relational agency as useful for capturing how staff may question the distribution of expertise between humans and machines.

Keywords

socially assistive robots postphenomenology cultural–historical activity theory (CHAT) multistability artefacts professional identity 

References

  1. Breazeal, C., Takanishi, A. and Kobayashi, T. (2008) Realism of the unreal: The Japanese robot and the performance of representation. Visual Communication 7 (3): 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen, C.M. and Bower, J.L. (1995) Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, http://hbr.org/1995/01/disruptive-technologies/ar/1, accessed 5 November 2011.
  3. Cole, M. (1996) Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cole, M. and Derry, J. (2005) We have met technology and it is us. In: R.J. Sternberg and D. Preiss (eds.) Intelligence and Technology: Impact of Tools on the Nature and Development of Human Skills. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 209–227.Google Scholar
  5. Daston, L. (ed.) (2004) Introduction: Speechless. In: Things That Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science. New York: Zone Books, MIT Press, pp. 9–24.Google Scholar
  6. De Laet, M. and Mol, A. (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 30 (2): 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Preester, H. (2010) Postphenomenology, embodiment and technics. Human Studies 33 (2): 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, A. (2010) Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards, A. and D'Arcy, C. (2004) Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review 56 (2): 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, A., Lunt, I. and Stamou, E. (2010) Inter-professional work and expertise: New roles at the boundaries of schools. British Educational Research Journal 36 (1): 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeström, Y. (1987) Learning by Expanding: An Activity–Theoretical Approach to Development Research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-kunsultit.Google Scholar
  12. Engeström, Y. (2007) Enriching the theory of expansive learning: Lessons from journeys toward co-configuration. Mind, Culture and Activity 14 (1&2): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feil-Seifer, D.J. and Mataric, M.J. (2005) Defining socially assistive robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 28 June–1 July. Chicago, IL, pp. 465–468.Google Scholar
  14. Hasse, C. and Wallace, J. (2012) Situating technological literacy in the workplace. In: J.R. Dakers (ed.) Defining Technological Literacy, 2nd edn. London: Palgrave Macmillan (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Heidegger, M. (1962 [1927]) Being and Time, Translated by J. Maquarrie and E. Robinson London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hornyak, T. (2006) Loving the Machine: The Art and Science of Japanese Robots. Tokyo, Japan: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
  17. Ihde, D. (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ihde, D. (2002) Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ihde, D. (2007) Listening and Voice: Phenomenologies of Sound. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ihde, D. (2008) The designer fallacy and technological imagination. In: P. Kroe, P.E. Vermaas, A. Light and S.A. Moore (eds.) Philosophy and Design: From Engineering to Architecture. Holland, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ihde, D. (2012) Experimental Phenomenology: Multistabilities, 2nd edn. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (1994) On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge 3 (1): 29–64.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (1987) Science In Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002 [1945]) Phenomenology of Perception, Translated by C. Smith. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  25. Robertson, J. (2010) Gendering Humanoid Robots: Robo-Sexism in Japan. Body & Society 16 1: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberger, R. (2011) A case study in the applied philosophy of imaging: The synaptic vesicle debate. Science, Technology, & Human Values 36 (6): 6–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberger, R. (2012) On Multistable Actor-Networks: Why You Need Both Phenomenology and ANT to Describe a Park Bench. Paper given at The Annual Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), session 096; 17–20 October, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark. Held jointly with European Association for the Study of Science and Technology (EASST).Google Scholar
  28. Rückriem, G. (2009) Digital technology and mediation: A challenge to activity theory. In: A. Sannino, H. Daniels and K.D. Gutierrez (eds.) Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schraube, E. (2009) Technology as materialized action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology 19 (2): 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strathern, M. (1999) Property, Substance, and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London; New Brunswick, NJ: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  31. Søndergaard, K.D. and Hasse, C. (2012) Teknologiforståelse – på skoler og hospitaler [Technological Literacy – At Schools and Hospitals]. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  32. Sorensen, E. (2009) The Materiality of Learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suchman, L. (2004) Figuring Personhood in Sciences of the Artificial. Published by the Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YL, UK, http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/suchman-figuring-personhood.pdf, accessed 10 October 2010.
  34. Suchman, L.A. (2007) Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Taggart, W., Turkle, S. and Kidd, C.D. (2005) An interactive robot in a nursing home: Preliminary remarks. In: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science. Stresa, Italy, July, Cognitive Science Society, http://web.media.mit.edu/~coryk/papers/ParoAndroidScience05.pdf, accessed 23 August 2012.Google Scholar
  36. Tamura, T. et al (2004) Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? Journal of Gerontology 59 (1): 83–85.Google Scholar
  37. Tenner, E. (1996) Why Things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  38. Turkle, S. (2011) Alone Together. Why We Expect More From Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005) What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design, Translated by R.P. Crease. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press (Original work published in 2000).Google Scholar
  40. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L.S. (1987) Thinking and speech. In: R.W. Rieber and A.S. Carton (eds.) The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1: Problems of General Psychology. New York: Plenum, pp. 39–285.Google Scholar
  42. Vygotsky, L.S. (1997) The history of the development of higher mental functions. In: R.W. Rieber (ed.) The Collected Works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4: The History of the Development of Higher Mental Functions. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  43. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T. and Tanie, K. (2004) Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. Proceedings of the IEEE 92 (11): 1780–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wajcman, J. (2010) Feminist theories of technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weizenbaum, J. (1966) ELIZA – A computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM 9 (1): 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wertsch, J.V. (1985) Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Winner, L. (1993) Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 18 (3): 362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathrine Hasse
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Learning, DPU, University of AarhusCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations