, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 432–445 | Cite as

Culture and Subjectivity in Neoliberal and Postfeminist Times

  • Rosalind GillEmail author
Original Article


My aim in this paper is to think through a number of issues concerning the relationship between culture and subjectivity. It seems to me that exploring the relationship of changing forms of political organization, social relations and cultural practices to changing modes and experiences of subjecthood and subjectivity are among the most important and urgent tasks for critical intellectual work. These questions go to the heart of understanding power, ideology and agency, and they require research that is interdisciplinary, psychosocial and intersectional. My particular focus in this short article is on the interrelations between changing representational practices in visual culture and changing subjectivity/ies. I argue that neoliberalism and postfeminism are central to understanding contemporary media culture, and I put the case for research that does not retreat from exploring how these broader social/political/economic/cultural discourses and formations may relate to subjectivity.


culture subjectivity postfeminism neoliberalism media 


  1. Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arthurs, J. (2004). Television and Sexuality: Rgulation and the Politics of Taste. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartky, S.L. (1990). Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bhaskaran, S. (2004). Made in India: Decolonizations, Queer Sexualities, Transnational Projects. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackman, L. and Walkerdine, V. (2001). Mass Hysteria: Critical Psychology and Media Studies. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordo, S.R. (1993). Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brain, J. (2006). Hungry for Meaning: Discourses of the Anorexic Body. Unpublished PhD thesis, LSE.Google Scholar
  9. Cronin, A. (2000). Consumerism and Compulsory Individuality: Women, Will and Potential. In Ahmed, S., Kilby, J., Lury, C., McNeil, M. and Skeggs, B. (eds) Transformations: Thinking through Feminism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Duits, L. and Van Zoonen, L. (2006). ‘Headscarves and porno-chic’. European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 13, pp. 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faludi, S. (1992). Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  12. Gill, R. (2003). From Sexual Objectification to Sexual Subjectification: The Resexualisation of Women's Bodies in the Media. Feminist Media Studies, 3 (1), pp. 99–106.Google Scholar
  13. Gill, R. (2007a). Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gill, R. (2008). Supersexualize Me! Advertising, (Post)feminism and ‘the Midriffs’. In Attwood, F.B., Rosalind., Cere, R. (eds) Mainstreaming Sex: the Sexualisation of Culture. London: I.B.Tauris.Google Scholar
  15. Goldman, R. (1992). Reading Ads Socially. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Grogan, S. (1999). Body Image: Understanding Body Dissatisfaction in Men, Women and Children. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, S. (1988). The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the Theorists. In Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L. (eds) Marxism and the Inerpretation of Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Hollows, J. (2000). Makeover Takeover on Britsh TV. Screen, 41 (3), pp. 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hook, D. (2005). Affecting Whiteness: Racism as Technology of Affect. International Journal of Critical Psychology, 16, pp. 74–99.Google Scholar
  20. Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. London & New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kilbourne, J. (1999). Can't Buy my Love: How Advertising Changes the Way we Think and Feel. New York, London: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  22. Lazar, M. (2004). (Post-) Feminism in Contemporary Advertising: A Global Discourse in a Local Context. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  23. Macdonald, M. (1995). Representing Women: Myths of Femininity in the Popular Media. London, New York, NY: E. Arnold; distributed exclusively in the USA by St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  24. Machin, D. and Thornborrow, J. (2003). Branding and Discourse: the Case of Cosmopolitan. Discourse and Society, 14, pp. 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McRobbie, A. (2004a). Notes on Postfeminism and Popular Culture: Bridget Jones and the New Gender Regime. In Harris, A. (ed.) All about the Girl: Culture, Power and Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. McRobbie, A. (2004b). Notes on “What Not to Wear” and Post-Feminist Symbolic Violence. In Adkins, L. and Skeggs, B. (eds) Feminism after Bordieu. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  27. Modleski, T. (1991). Feminism Without Women. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Murdock, G. and Golding, P. (1977). Capitalism, Communication and Class Relations. In Gurevitch (ed.) Mass Communication and Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Peck, J. (1995). TV Talk Shows as Therapeutic Discourse: The Ideological Labour of the Televised Talk Cure. Communication Theory, 5 (1), pp. 58–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Probyn, E. (2008). Silences Behind the Mantra: Critiquing Feminist Fat. Feminism & Psychology, 18 (3), pp. 401–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Radner, H. (1993). Pretty is as Pretty does: Free Enterprise and the Marriage Plot. In Collins, H., Radner, H. and Preacher, A. (eds) Film Theory Goes to the Movies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Radner, H. (1999). Queering the Girl. In Radner, H.L., Moya (eds) Swinging Single: Representing Sexuality in the 1960s. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.Google Scholar
  33. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the Soul: the Shaping of the Private Self. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, N. (1996). Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sawicki, J. (1991). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Tyler, I. (2008). ‘Chav mum, chav scum’: Class Disgust in Contemporary Britain. Feminist Media Studies, 8 (2), pp. 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walkerdine, V. (1997). Daddy's Girl: Young Girls and Popular Culture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H. and Melody, J. (2001). Growing up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  39. Whelehan, I. (2000). Overloaded: Popular Culture and the Future of Feminism. London: Women's Press.Google Scholar
  40. Williamson, J. (1986). The Problem of being Popular. New Socialist, 41, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  41. Williamson, J. (2003, 31st May). Sexism with and Alibi. The Guardian, (available online at
  42. Wolf, N. (1990). The Beauty Myth. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  43. Wood, H. and Skeggs, B. (2004). Notes on Ethical Scenarios of self on British Reality TV. Feminist Media Studies, 4 (2), pp. 205–208.Google Scholar
  44. Wykes, M. and Gunter, B. (2005). The Media and Body Image. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations