International Politics Reviews

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 99–103 | Cite as

Hierarchy among NGOs: Authority and influence in global civil society

  • Mette Eilstrup-SangiovanniEmail author
Book Review

How powerful is global civil society? What groups are most influential within it? These questions have long occupied scholars of transnational advocacy. Research on transnational advocacy in the 1990s mainly sought to establish that civil society has the authority to shape the moral norms that govern global politics. Thus, scholars often portrayed NGOs as a relatively homogenous crowd seeking to change the moral compass of states and transnational corporations. Recent work has instead focused on how NGOs differ in power and status. A premise of such scholarship is that competition for resources and visibility lead NGOs to seek to differentiate themselves from their peers in order to survive and grow. Competition in turn produces hierarchy among NGOs.

The Authority Trapenters this debate with a creative and original argument and data. Like many others, Stroup and Wong note that transnational advocacy networks are rarely flat and horizontal. In the NGO community, as elsewhere, some...


  1. Bob, C. (2005). The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carpenter, C.R. (2011). Vetting the advocacy agenda: Network centrality and the paradox of weapons norms. International Organization, 65(1), 69–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carpenter, C. (2014). “Lost” Causes: Agenda-Vetting in Global Issues Networks and the Shaping of Human Security. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. and Sharman J.C. (2018) Vigilantes Beyond Borders: NGO Enforcement in Global Governance (Unpublished paper).Google Scholar
  5. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. and Phelps-Bondaroff, T. (2014). From advocacy to confrontation: Direct enforcement by environmental NGOs. International Studies Quarterly, 58(2), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Henriksen, L. and Seabrooke, L. (2017). Professional Networks in Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lake, D.A. and Wong, W. (2009). The politics of networks: interests, power, and human rights norms. In M. Kahler (Ed.), Networked Politics; Agency, Power, and Governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Murdie, A., Brewington, D. and Davis, D.R. (2014). The ties that bind: A network analysis of human rights INGOs. British Journal of Political Science, 44(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Price, R. (2003). Transnational civil society and advocacy in world politics. World Politics, 55(2), 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ron, J., Ramos, H. and Rodgers, K. (2005). Transnational information politics: Human rights NGO reporting, 1986–2000. International Studies Quarterly, 49, 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thrall, A.T., Stecula, D. and Sweet, D. (2014). May we have your attention please? Human-rights NGOs and the problem of global communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(2), 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations