Advertisement

Impact of corporate governance characteristics on intellectual capital performance of firms in India

  • Bharathi KamathEmail author
Original Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the corporate governance characteristics and its influence on the intellectual capital (IC) performance for a sample of 95 firms listed on National Stock Exchange in India. The corporate governance (CG) characteristics are represented through board size, independence of directors, frequency of board meetings, remuneration of directors and composition of board. The impact of these CG characteristics on the performance of intellectual capital and its components is studied for a 7-year period, i.e. FY2010–2011 to FY2016–2017, using panel regression. The research findings provide clear evidence that CG characteristics influence the IC performance of only large-cap firms in India. Further, board size and independence of directors are seen to have the most significant impacts. Board size is negatively associated with IC performance of large-cap firms. Capital expended efficiency and productivity of midcap firms are observed to have a significant inverted-U relation with board size. The relative significance of various other CG factors varies for IC as well as its sub-components. The findings of this study are important because it gives a strong empirical evidence for regulatory authorities in India to strictly monitor the compliance of rules on structure and composition of the board of directors besides just laying down broad guidelines for the listed companies. This also serves as the first research work to justify the significance of corporate governance on IC performance of firms in India. One of the limitations of this research is inability to incorporate several other characteristics of board such as duality and detailed profile of board members due to non-availability of time-series data for all the firms.

Keywords

Corporate governance Board characteristics Intellectual capital Human capital India 

Notes

References

  1. Abdullah, A., and M. Page. 2009. Corporate governance and corporate performance: UK FTSE 350 companies, 1–132. UK: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.Google Scholar
  2. Abeysekera, I. 2010. The influence of board size on intellectual capital disclosure by Kenyan listed firms. Journal of Intellectual Capital 11(4): 504–518.Google Scholar
  3. Abidin, Z.Z., N.M. Kamal, and K. Jusoff. 2009. Board structure and corporate performance in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance 1(1): 150.Google Scholar
  4. Aboagye, Anthony Q., and James Otieku. 2010. Are Ghanaian MFIs’ performance associated with corporate governance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 10(3): 307–320.Google Scholar
  5. Ahmed Haji, A. 2015. The role of audit committee attributes in intellectual capital disclosures: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal 30(8/9): 756–784.Google Scholar
  6. Al-Ebel, A. M. S. 2013. Board of director and audit committee effectiveness, ownership structure and intellectual capital disclosure of listed banks in GCC countries. Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia.Google Scholar
  7. Altuner, Dogan, Saban Çelik, and Tuna Can Güleç. 2015. The linkages among intellectual capital, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance 15(4): 491–507.Google Scholar
  8. Bakhsha, A., A. Afrazeh, and A. Esfahanipour. 2017. A criticism on value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) model. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 17(6): 59–71.Google Scholar
  9. Black, B.S., I. Love, and A. Rachinsky. 2006. Corporate governance indices and firms’ market values: Time series evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review 7(4): 361–379.Google Scholar
  10. Bohdanowicz, L. 2014. Managerial ownership and intellectual capital efficiency: Evidence from Poland. China-USA Business Review 13(10): 626–635.Google Scholar
  11. Bonn, I., T. Yoshikawa, and P.H. Phan. 2004. Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management 3(1): 105–125.Google Scholar
  12. Bontis, Nick, William Chua Chong Keow, and Stanley Richardson. 2000. Intellectual capital and business performance in Malaysian industries. Journal of Intellectual Capital 1(1): 85–100.Google Scholar
  13. Cerbioni, F., and A. Parbonetti. 2007. Exploring the effects of corporate governance on intellectual capital disclosure: An analysis of European biotechnology companies. European Accounting Review 16(4): 791–826.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, Ming-Chin, Shu-Ju Cheng, and Yuhchang Hwang. 2005. An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms’ market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6(2): 159–176.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, Martin, Dyna Seng, and Rosalind H. Whiting. 2011. Intellectual capital and firm performance in Australia. Journal of Intellectual Capital 12(4): 505–530.Google Scholar
  16. Dwivedi, N., and A.K. Jain. 2005. Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 17(3): 161–172.Google Scholar
  17. Dženopoljac, V., S. Janoševic, and N. Bontis. 2016. Intellectual capital and financial performance in the Serbian ICT industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital 17(2): 373–396.Google Scholar
  18. Firer, Steven, and S. Mitchell Williams. 2003. Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(3): 348–360.Google Scholar
  19. Gan, K., Z. Saleh, M. Abessi, and C.C. Huang. 2013. Intellectual capital disclosure in the context of corporate governance. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital 10(1): 52–70.Google Scholar
  20. Golden, B.R., and E.J. Zajac. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? Inclination × power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 22(12): 1087–1111.Google Scholar
  21. Haji Ahmed, A., and N.A. Mohd Ghazali. 2013. A longitudinal examination of intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance attributes in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting 21(1): 27–52.Google Scholar
  22. Haniffa, R., and M. Hudaib. 2006. Corporate governance structure and performance of Malaysian listed companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 33(7–8): 1034–1062.Google Scholar
  23. Hidalgo, R.L., E. García-Meca, and I. Martínez. 2011. Corporate governance and intellectual capital disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics 100(3): 483–495.Google Scholar
  24. Ho, C.A., and S.M. Williams. 2003. International comparative analysis of the association between board structure and the efficiency of value added by a firm from its physical capital and intellectual capital resources. The International Journal of Accounting 38(4): 465–491.Google Scholar
  25. Holland, J. 2003. Intellectual capital and the capital market–organisation and competence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 16(1): 39–48.Google Scholar
  26. Joshi, M., D. Singh Ubha, and J. Sidhu. 2012. Intellectual capital disclosures by Indian and Australian information technology companies: A comparative analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital 13(4): 582–598.Google Scholar
  27. Kamath, Bharathi. 2017. Determinants of intellectual capital disclosure: Evidence from India. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 15(3): 367–391.Google Scholar
  28. Kamath, G.Bharathi. 2008. Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital 9(4): 684–704.Google Scholar
  29. Keenan, J., and M. Aggestam. 2001. Corporate governance and intellectual capital: Some conceptualisations. Corporate Governance: An International Review 9(4): 259–275.Google Scholar
  30. Khaled, Samaha, Hichem Khlif, and Khaled Hussainey. 2015. The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 24(4): 13–28.Google Scholar
  31. Kiel, G.C., and G.J. Nicholson. 2003. Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 11(3): 189–205.Google Scholar
  32. Kotak, U. 2017. Report of the committee on corporate governance, SEBI. Accessed at https://www.sebi.gov.in/reports/reports/oct-2017/report-of-the-committee-on-corporate-governance_36177.html. March 2018.
  33. Li, J., R. Pike, and R. Haniffa. 2008. Intellectual capital disclosure and corporate governance structure in UK firms. Accounting and Business Research 38(2): 137–159.Google Scholar
  34. Liang, Chiung Ju, Tzu Tsang Huang, and Wen Cheng Lin. 2011. Does ownership structure affect firm value? Intellectual capital across industries perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital 12(4): 552–570.Google Scholar
  35. Madi, H.K., Z. Ishak, and N.A.A. Manaf. 2014. The impact of audit committee characteristics on corporate voluntary disclosure. Procedia-social and Behavioural Sciences 164: 486–492.Google Scholar
  36. Mahmudi, Bambang, and Enok Nurhayati. 2015. The influence of board governance characteristics on intellectual capital performance (empirical study on listed banks in BEI 2008–2012). Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 4(1): 417–430.Google Scholar
  37. Makki, M.A.M., and S.A. Lodhi. 2014. Impact of corporate governance on intellectual capital efficiency and financial performance. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 8(2): 305–330.Google Scholar
  38. McRitchie. 2015. Corporate governance in India. Accessed at https://www.corpgov.net/2015/05/corporate-governance-in-india/. January 2018.
  39. Meressa, H.A. 2016. Determinants of intellectual capital performance: Empirical evidence from Ethiopian banks. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting 7(13): 10–19.Google Scholar
  40. Meyer, E., and J. de Wet. 2013. The impact of board structure on the financial performance of listed South African companies. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition 9(3): 18–31.Google Scholar
  41. Mouritsen, J. 1988. Driving growth: Economic value added versus intellectual capital. Management Accounting Research 8(6): 15–23.Google Scholar
  42. Murthy, N. and R. Narayan. 2003. Report of the SEBI committee on corporate governance. Accessed at https://www.sebi.gov.in/reports/reports/mar-2003/the-report-of-shri-n-r-narayana-murthy-committee-on-corporate-governance-for-public-comments-_12986.html. January 2018.
  43. Muttakin, Mohammad Badrul, Arifur Khan, and Ataur Rahman Belal. 2015. Intellectual capital disclosures and corporate governance: An empirical examination. Advances in Accounting 31(2): 219–227.Google Scholar
  44. Nazari, Jamal A., and Irene M. Herremans. 2007. Extended VAIC model: Measuring intellectual capital components. Journal of Intellectual Capital 8(4): 595–609.Google Scholar
  45. Pulic, A. 2000. VAIC™ an accounting tool for IC management. International Journal of Technology Management 20(5–8): 702–714.Google Scholar
  46. Reddy, Krishna, Stuart Locke, and Frank Scrimgeour. 2010. The efficacy of principle-based corporate governance practices and firm financial performance: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Managerial Finance 6(3): 190–219.Google Scholar
  47. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. 2003. Intellectual capital and firm performance of US multinational firms: A study of the resource-based and stakeholder views. Journal of Intellectual capital 4(2): 215–226.Google Scholar
  48. Safieddine, Assem, Dima Jamali, and Sarah Noureddine. 2009. Corporate governance and intellectual capital: Evidence from an academic institution. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 9(2): 146–157.Google Scholar
  49. Saleh, N.M., M.R.C.A. Rahman, and M.S. Hassan. 2009. Ownership structure and intellectual capital performance in Malaysia. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF) 5(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
  50. SEBI. 2013. Consultative paper on review of corporate governance norms in India, securities and exchange board of India. Accessed at https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/attachdocs/1357290354602.pdf. 4 January 2018.
  51. Soon Yau, F., L. Sin Chun, and R. Balaraman. 2009. Intellectual capital reporting and corporate characteristics of public-listed companies in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting 7(1): 17–35.Google Scholar
  52. Ståhle, Pirjo, Sten Ståhle, and Samuli Aho. 2011. Value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC): A critical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Capital 12(4): 531–551.Google Scholar
  53. Unadkat, K., and P. Bagdi. 2017. Top ten issues in corporate governance practices in India. Association of Corporate Counsel. Accessed at http://www.acc.com/legalresources/publications/topten/tticgpi.cfm?makepdf=1. March 2018.
  54. Veltri, S., and R. Mazzotta. 2016. The association of board composition, intellectual capital and firm performance in a high ownership concentration context: Evidence from Italy. International Journal of Business and Management 11(10): 317–331.Google Scholar
  55. Wang, M.C. 2013. Value relevance on intellectual capital valuation methods: The role of corporate governance. Quality & Quantity 47(2): 1213–1223.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, S. M. 2001. Corporate governance diversity and its impact on intellectual capital performance in an emerging economy. Manuscript, University of Calgary, Canada. Accessed from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4fb9/4c712fdf46f7205eb26bea54b94bb6bf4174.pdf).
  57. Wu, M.F., Y.J. Lee, and G.L. Wang. 2012. To verify how intellectual capital affects organizational performance in listed Taiwan IC design companies with considering the moderator of corporate governance. The Journal of Global Business Management 8(1): 20–32.Google Scholar
  58. Yoshikawa, T., and P.H. Phan. 2001. Alternative corporate governance systems in Japanese firms: Implications for a shift to stockholder-centered corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 18(2): 183–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MumbaiMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations