Advertisement

Dynamic state interest group systems: a new look with new data

  • Thomas T. HolyokeEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Existing data sets on state interest group systems tend to be either cross-sectional (observations for only 1 year) or panel-style (observations of 2 years about a decade apart). In this paper, I describe a new data set based on raw counts of interest groups and organizations lobbying in the states collected by the National Institute for Money in State Politics, data which are observed annually from 2006 to 2015. After several years of careful coding, I present initial analyses of this state interest group data broken out by economic sector (based on National Center for Economic Statistics codes), support for business policies, differences between membership organizations and other organizational types, like corporations and governments. Furthermore, I also explore how the broad contours of these interest group communities shift and change over time, allowing me to see whether any type of organized interest is able to dominate their state interest group system.

Keywords

Interest groups Lobbying State politics Organized interests 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, J., A. Newmark, V. Gray, and D. Lowery. 2004. Mayflies and old bulls: Organization persistence in state interest group communities. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 4(Summer): 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anzia, S.F. 2018. Looking for influence in all the wrong places: How studying subnational policy can revive research on interest groups. Journal of Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1086/700726.Google Scholar
  3. Benz, J., J.H. Kirkland, V. Gray, D. Lowery, J. Sykes, and M. Deason. 2011. Mediated density: The indirect relationship between U.S. state public policy and PACs. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 11(December): 440–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berry, J.M. 1999. The new liberalism: The rising power of citizens groups. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berry, W.D., E.J. Ringquist, R.C. Fording, and R.L. Hanson. 1998. Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–1993. American Journal of Political Science 42(January): 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowling, C.J., and M.R. Ferguson. 2001. Divided government, interest representation, and policy differences: Competing explanations for gridlock in the fifty states. Journal of Politics 63(February): 182–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasher, H., D. Lowery, and V. Gray. 1999. State lobby registration data: The anomalous case of Florida (and Minnesota too!). Legislative Studies Quarterly 24(May): 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunk, G.G., K.G. Hunter, and L.A. Wilson. 1991. Economic innovation and interest groups: The case of patents granted to residents of the American states. Social Science Quarterly 72(September): 601–607.Google Scholar
  9. Drope, J.M., and W.L. Hansen. 2009. New evidence for the theory of groups: Trade association lobbying in Washington, DC. Political Research Quarterly 62(June): 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flavin, P. 2015. Campaign finance laws, policy outcomes, and political equality in the American states. Political Research Quarterly 68(March): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, V., J. Cluverius, J.J. Harden, B. Shor, and D. Lowery. 2015. Party competition, party polarization, and the changing demand for lobbying in the American states. American Politics Research 43(2): 175–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gray, V., and D. Lowery. 1996. The population ecology of interest representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenwood, J., and J. Dreger. 2013. The transparency register: A European vanguard of strong lobby regulation. Interest Groups & Advocacy 2(May): 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen, W.L., N.J. Mitchell, and J.M. Drope. 2005. The logic of private and collective action. American Journal of Political Science 49(January): 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holyoke, T.T. 2015. Challenges of integrating levels of analysis in interest group research. In The organizational ecology of interest communities, ed. D. Lowery, D. Halpin, and V. Gray, 79–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Holyoke, T.T. 2017. Interest groups and lobbying research in a higher level context: Two tests of integrating multiple levels of analysis. American Politics Research 5(September): 887–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter, K.G., L.A. Wilson, and G.G. Brunk. 1991. Societal complexity and interest-group lobbying in the American states. Journal of Politics 53(May): 488–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jourdain, C., S. Hug, and F. Varone. 2017. Lobbying across issues: An issue-tracing approach. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 17(June): 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. King, D.C., and J.L. Walker Jr. 1992. The provision of benefits by interest groups in the United States. Journal of Politics 54(2): 394–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lowery, D., and V. Gray. 1995. How some rules just don’t matter: The regulation of lobbyists. Public Choice 91(2): 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lowery, D., and V. Gray. 2007. Interest organization communities: Their assembly and consequences. In Interest group politics, 7th ed, ed. B.A. Loomis and A.J. Cigler, 130–154. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lowery, D., V. Gray, J. Anderson, and A.J. Newmark. 2004. Collective action and the mobilization of institutions. Journal of Politics 66(August): 684–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lowery, D., V. Gray, and J. Cluverius. 2015. Temporal change in the density of state interest communities: 1980 to 2007. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15(2): 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowery, D., V. Gray, and M. Fellowes. 2005. Sisyphus meets the Borg: Economic scale and inequalities in interest representation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 17(1): 41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahoney, C. 2008. Brussels versus the Beltway: Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Maitland, I. 1985. Interest groups and economic growth rates. Journal of Politics 47(February): 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McGovern, G., and M. D. Greenberg. 2014. Shining a light on state campaign finance: An evaluation of the impact of the National Institute on Money in State Politics. Report by the Institute for Civil Justice at the RAND Corporation. See http://www.followthemoney.org/assets/press/RAND-report-Aug-2014/RAND-NIMSP-Report.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2019.
  28. Morehouse, S.M. 1981. State politics, parties, and policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  29. Newmark, A.J. 2017. Lobbying regulation in the states revisited: What are we trying to measure, and how do we measure it? Interest Groups & Advocacy 6(October): 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Newmark, A.J., and A.J. Nownes. 2017. It’s all relative: Perceptions of interest group influence. Interest Groups & Advocacy 6(March): 66–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nownes, A.J. 2000. Policy conflict and the structure of interest communities: A comparative state analysis. American Politics Quarterly 28(July): 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nownes, A.J., and P. Freeman. 1998. Interest group activity in the states. Journal of Politics 60(February): 1181–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenthal, A. 1993. The third house: Lobbyists and lobbying in the states. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  35. Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. Interest representation: The dominance of institutions. American Political Science Review 78(1): 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strickland, J. 2018. A paradox of political reform: Shadow interests in the US states. American Politics Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18788049.Google Scholar
  37. Thomas, C.S., and R.J. Hrebenar. 1992. Changing patterns of interest group activity: A regional perspective. In The politics of interests: Interest groups transformed, ed. M.P. Petracca, 150–174. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  38. Thomas, C.S., and R.J. Hrebenar. 2004. Interest groups in the states. In Politics of the American states, 8th ed, ed. V. Gray and R.L. Hanson, 100–128. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  39. Thomas, H.F., and T.M. LaPira. 2017. How many lobbyists are in Washington? Shadow lobbying and the gray market for policy advocacy. Interest Groups & Advocacy 6(October): 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Witko, C., and A.J. Newmark. 2005. Business mobilization and public policy in the U.S. states. Social Science Quarterly 86(June): 356–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yackee, S.W. 2015. Invisible (and visible) lobbying: The case of state regulatory policymaking. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 15(September): 322–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeigler, L.H., and H. van Dalen. 1976. Interest groups in the states. In Politics of the American states, 3rd ed, ed. H. Jacob and K.N. Vines. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  43. Zeller, B. 1954. American state legislatures, 2nd ed. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceCalifornia State University, FresnoFresnoUSA

Personalised recommendations