Advertisement

Competence Measurement in (Mathematics) Teacher Education and Beyond: Implications for Policy

  • Gabriele KaiserEmail author
  • Johannes König
Original Article
  • 19 Downloads

Teacher education and the professional development of teachers has become a prominent topic in recent policy discussions worldwide. However, many educational changes have been carried out without clear reference to the results of empirical studies evaluating the efficiency of teacher education programs. This paper aims to contribute to this discussion. It provides an overview on the current knowledge derived from empirical research on the structure of the professional competence of teachers and competence development during teacher education. First, a description of a theoretical framework for the professional competence of teachers and their impact of competence measurement with pre- and in-service mathematics teachers is given. Then, the competence development of teachers at the transition from teacher education into teaching practice and the relation to instructional quality and student learning gains is described. Finally, implications for policy are outlined, emphasizing the necessity of a sound knowledge base in teacher education, which has to be complemented by professional noticing accounting for situated facets of teacher competence. Due to the dynamic acquisition of teacher competence through practical learning opportunities in early career teaching, strong professional development measures are needed.

Keywords

policy implications teacher competence teacher education teacher professional development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the frame Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education (KoKoHs) as TEDS-Validate (Grant Number: 01PK15006A, 01PK15006B).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ball, D., Thames, M.H. and Phelps, G. (2008) ‘Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?’, Journal of Teacher Education 59: 389–407.Google Scholar
  2. Baumert, J. and Kunter, M. (2006) Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften’, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 9(4): 469–520.Google Scholar
  3. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M. and Tsai, Y.-M. (2010) ‘Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress’, American Educational Research Journal 47(1): 133–180.Google Scholar
  4. Blömeke, S. (2017) Modelling teachers’ professional competence as a multi-dimensional construct’, in S. Guerriero (ed.), Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, Paris: OECD, pp. 119–135.Google Scholar
  5. Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. and Lehmann, R. (2008) Professionelle Kompetenz angehender Lehrerinnen und Lehrer, Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  6. Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G. and Lehmann, R. (2010) (eds) TEDS-M 2008. Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte für die Sekundarstufe I im internationalen Vergleich, Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  7. Blömeke, S., Hsieh, F., Kaiser, G. and Schmidt, W. (2014a) (eds.) International perspectives on teacher knowledge, beliefs and opportunities to learn, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Suhl, U., Benthien, J., Döhrmann, M. and Kaiser, G. (2014b) ‘Von der Lehrerausbildung in den Beruf – Fachbezogenes Wissen als Voraussetzung für Wahrnehmung, Interpretation und Handeln im Unterricht’, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17(3): 509–542.Google Scholar
  9. Blömeke, S., Gustafsson, J.-E. and Shavelson, R. (2015) Beyond dichotomies: Competence viewed as a continuum’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223: 3–13.Google Scholar
  10. Blömeke, S., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., König, J. and Suhl, U. (2016) ‘The relation between content-specific and general teacher knowledge and skills’, Teaching and Teacher Education 56: 35–46.Google Scholar
  11. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2007) ‘Rahmenprogramm zur Förderung der empirischen Bildungsforschung’, Bonn: BMBF.Google Scholar
  12. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2014) Bekanntmachung des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung von Richtlinien zur Förderung der “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung”, Berlin: BMBF.Google Scholar
  13. Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) (2018). Richtlinie zur Förderung von Projekten in der “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung”mit den Schwerpunkten “Digitalisierung in der Lehrerbildung”und/oder” Lehrerbildung für die beruflichen Schulen”. Berlin: BMBF.Google Scholar
  14. Bromme, R., Prenzel, M. and Jäger, M. (2014) ‘Empirische Bildungsforschung und evidenzbasierte Bildungspolitik’, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 17(4): 3–54.Google Scholar
  15. Bruckmaier, G., Krauss, S., Blum, W. and Leiss, D. (2016) Measuring mathematics teachers‘professional competence by using video clips (COACTIV video)’, ZDM Mathematics Education 48(1–2): 111–124.Google Scholar
  16. Burkhardt, H. and Schoenfeld, A.H. (2003) ‘Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise’, Educational Researcher 32(9): 3–14.Google Scholar
  17. Charalambous, C. and Praetorius, A.-K. (2018) Studying mathematics instruction through different lenses: setting the ground for understanding instructional quality more comprehensively’, ZDM Mathematics Education 50(3): 355–366.Google Scholar
  18. Cochran-Smith, M. and Zeichner, K.M. (2005) Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education, Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006) ‘Assessing teacher education. The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes’, Journal of Teacher Education 57: 120–138.Google Scholar
  20. Darling-Hammond, L., Berry, B. and Thoreson, A. (2001) Does teacher certification matter? Evaluating the evidence’, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 23(1): 57–77.Google Scholar
  21. Doll, J., Jentsch, A., Meyer, D., Kaiser, G., Kaspar, K. and König, J. (2018) ‘Zur Nutzung schulpraktischer Lerngelegenheiten an zwei deutschen Hochschulen: lernprozessbezogene Tätigkeiten angehender Lehrpersonen in Masterpraktika’, Lehrerbildung auf dem Prüfstand 11(1): 24–45.Google Scholar
  22. Flores, M. A. (2016) ‘Teacher Education Curriculum’, in J. Loughran and M.L. Hamilton (eds.) International Handbook of Teacher Education, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 187–230.Google Scholar
  23. Gräsel, C., Decristan, J. and König, J. (2017) ‘Adaptiver Umgang mit Heterogenität im Unterricht‘Unterrichtswissenschaft 45(4): 195–206.Google Scholar
  24. Großschedl, J., Harms, U., Kleickmann; T. and Glowinski, I. (2015) Preservice Biology Teachers’ Professional Knowledge: Structure and Learning Opportunities’, Journal of Science Teacher Education 26(3): 291–318.Google Scholar
  25. Guerriero, S. (ed.) (2017) Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  26. Helmke, A. (2012) Unterrichtsqualität und Lehrerprofessionalität: Diagnose, Evaluation und Verbesserung des Unterrichts, Seelze-Velber: Klett/Kallmeyer.Google Scholar
  27. Hill, H.C. and Chin, M. (2018) ‘Connections Between Teachers’ Knowledge of Students, Instruction, and Achievement Outcomes’, American Educational Research Journal 55(5): 1076–1112.Google Scholar
  28. Hill, H.C., Schilling, S.G. and Loewenberg Ball, D. (2004) Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching’, The Elementary School Journal 105(1): 11–30.Google Scholar
  29. Hill, H.C., Rowan, B. and Loewenberg Ball, D. (2005) Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement’, American Educational Research Journal 42(2): 371–406.Google Scholar
  30. Holodynski, M., Möller, K. and König, J. (2018) ‘Videos in der Ausbildung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern’, in Ministerium für Schule und Bildung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalien (eds). Perspektiven und Herausforderungen für die Lehrerbildung in NRW, Amtsblatt des Ministeriums für Schule und Bildung special issue: 23–25.Google Scholar
  31. Huang, R., Li, Y., Zhang, J. and Li, X. (2011) Improving teachers’ expertise in mathematics instruction through exemplary lesson development’, ZDM Mathematics Education 43(6–7): 805–817.Google Scholar
  32. Ingvarson, L., Schwille, J., Tatto, M.T., Rowley, G., Peck, R. and Senk, S.L. (2013) ‘An analysis of teacher education context, structure, and quality-assurance arrangements in TEDS-countries’, Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
  33. Kaiser, G., Busse, A., Hoth, J., König, J., and Blömeke, S. (2015) ‘About the Complexities of Video-Based Assessments: Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Overcoming Shortcomings of Research on Teachers ‘Competence’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13(3): 369–387.Google Scholar
  34. Kaiser, G., Blömeke, S., König, J., Busse, A., Döhrmann, M. and Hoth, J. (2017) ‘Professional competencies of (prospective) mathematics teachers – cognitive versus situated approaches’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 94(2): 161–182, 183–184.Google Scholar
  35. Kerry, T. (ed.) (2010) ‘Meeting the challenges of change in postgraduate education’, London: Continuing International Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Kersting, N. (2008) Using video clips of mathematics classroom instruction as item prompts to measure teachers’ knowledge of teaching mathematics’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 68(5): 845–861.Google Scholar
  37. Kleickmann, T. and Anders, Y. (2013) ‘Learning at University’, in M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss and M. Neubrand (eds.) Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers, New York: Springer, pp. 321–332.Google Scholar
  38. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., Cheo, M. and Baumert, J. (2015) Content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in Taiwanese and German mathematics teachers’, Teaching and Teacher Education 45: 115–126.Google Scholar
  39. Klieme, E. and Leutner, D. (2006) ‘Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen. Beschreibung eines neu eingerichteten Schwerpunktprogramms der DFG’, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 52(6): 876–903.Google Scholar
  40. Knievel, I., Lindmeier, A.M. and Heinze, A. (2015) Beyond knowledge: Measuring primary teachers’ subject-specific competences in and for teaching mathematics with items based on video vignettes’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13(2): 309–329.Google Scholar
  41. König, J. (2013) ‘First comes the theory, then the practice? On the acquisition of general pedagogical knowledge during initial teacher education’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11(4): 999–1028.Google Scholar
  42. König, J. and Rothland, M. (2018) ‘Das Praxissemester in der Lehrerbildung: Stand der Forschung und zentrale Ergebnisse des Projekts Learning to Practice’, in J. König, M. Rothland and N. Schaper (eds.) Learning to Practice, Learning to Reflect? Ergebnisse aus der Längsschnittstudie LtP zur Nutzung und Wirkung des Praxissemesters in der Lehrerbildung, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 1–62.Google Scholar
  43. König, J. and Seifert, A. (Eds.) (2012) ‘Lehramtsstudierende erwerben pädagogisches Professionswissen. Ergebnisse der Längsschnittstudie LEK zur Wirksamkeit der erziehungswissenschaftlichen Lehrerausbildung’, Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  44. König, J., Blömeke, S., Paine, L., Schmidt, W.H. and Hsieh, F.J. (2011) ‘General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: On the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan’, Journal of Teacher Education 62(2): 188–201.Google Scholar
  45. König, J., Blömeke, S., Klein, P., Suhl, U., Busse, A. and Kaiser, G. (2014) ‘Is teachers’ general pedagogical knowledge a premise for noticing and interpreting classroom situations? A video-based assessment approach’, Teaching and Teacher Education 38: 76–88.Google Scholar
  46. König, J., Lammerding, S., Nold, G., Rohde, A., Strauß, S. and Tachtsoglou, S. (2016) ‘Teachers’ Professional Knowledge for Teaching English as a Foreign Language: Assessing the Outcomes of Teacher Education’, Journal of Teacher Education 67(4): 320–337.Google Scholar
  47. König, J., Ligtvoet, R., Klemenz, S. and Rothland, M. (2017) ‘Effects of Opportunities to Learn in Teacher Preparation on Future Teachers’ General Pedagogical Knowledge: Analyzing Program Characteristics and Outcomes’, Studies in Educational Evaluation 53: 122–133.Google Scholar
  48. Krainer, K. and Llinares, S. (2010) ‘Mathematics teacher education’, in P. Peterson, E. Baker, and B. McGaw (eds.) International Encyclopedia of Education, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 702–705.Google Scholar
  49. Kramer, C., König, J., Kaiser, G., Ligtvoet, R. and Blömeke, S. (2017) ‘Der Einsatz von Unterrichtsvideos in der universitären Ausbildung: Zur Wirksamkeit video- und transkriptgestützter Seminare zur Klassenführung auf pädagogisches Wissen und situationsspezifische Fähigkeiten angehender Lehrkräfte’, Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 20 (Supplement 1): 137–164.Google Scholar
  50. Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M. and Jordan, A. (2008) Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers’, Journal of Educational Psychology 100(3): 716–725.Google Scholar
  51. Krauss, S., Lindl, A., Schilcher, A., Fricke, M., Göhring, A. and Hofmann, B. (eds) (2017) FALKO: Fachspezifische Lehrerkompetenzen: Konzeption von Professionswissenstests in den Fächern Deutsch, Englisch, Latein, Physik, Musik, Evangelische Religion und Pädagogik, Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  52. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S. and Neubrand, M. (eds) (2013) Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers. Results from the COACTIV Project, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Kunter, M., Kunina-Habenicht, O., Baumert, J., Dicke, T., Holzberger, D., Lohse-Bossenz, H., Leutner, D., Schulze-Stocker, F. and Terhart, E. (2017) ‘Bildungswissenschaftliches Wissen und professionelle Kompetenz in der Lehramtsausbildung – Ergebnisse des Projekts BilWiss’, in C. Gräsel and K. Trempler (eds). Entwicklung von Professionalität pädagogischen Personals, Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar
  54. Li, Y., Tang, C. and Gong, Z. (2011) Improving teacher expertise through master teacher work stations: a case study’, ZDM Mathematics Education 43(6–7): 763–776.Google Scholar
  55. Nilsen, T., and Gustafsson, J.-E. (eds) (2016) Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes, Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  56. Richter, D. (2013) ‘Professional Development Across the Teaching Career’, in M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss and M. Neubrand (eds.) Cognitive Activation in the Mathematics Classroom and Professional Competence of Teachers, New York: Springer, pp. 333–342.Google Scholar
  57. Rowland, T. and Ruthven, K. (eds) (2011) Mathematical knowledge in teaching, Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  58. Schack, E.O., Fisher, M.H. and Wilhelm, J. A. (eds) (2017) Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives, Contexts, and Frameworks, Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Scheerens, J. and Blömeke, S. (2016) Integrating teacher education effectiveness research into educational effectiveness models’, Educational Research Review 18: 70–87.Google Scholar
  60. Schlesinger, L., Jentsch, A., Kaiser, G., König, J. and Blömeke, S. (2018) ‘Subject-specific characteristics of instructional quality in mathematics education’, ZDM Mathematics Education 50(3): 475–490.Google Scholar
  61. Seidel, T. and Stürmer, K. (2014) Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers’, American Educational Research Journal 51(4): 739–771.Google Scholar
  62. Sherin, M.G., Jacobs, V.R. and Philipp, R.A. (eds) (2011) Mathematics Teacher Noticing. Seeing Through Teachers’ Eyes, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Shulman, L. S. (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform’, Harvard Educational Research 57: 1–22.Google Scholar
  64. Slavin, R. E. (2002) ‘Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research’, Educational researcher 31(7): 15–21.Google Scholar
  65. Sonmark, K., Révai, N., Gottschalk, F., Deligiannidi, K. and Burns, T. (2017) Understanding teachers' pedagogical knowledge: report on an international pilot study. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 159, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Stahnke, R., Schueler, S. and Roesken-Winter, B. (2016) Teachers‘perception, interpretation, and decision-making: a systematic review of empirical mathematics education research ‘ZDM Mathematics Education 48(1–2): 1–27.Google Scholar
  67. Steffensky, M., Gold, B., Holodynski, M. and Möller, K. (2015) Professional vision of classroom management and learning support in science classrooms — does professional vision differ across general and contentspecific classroom interactions?’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13(2): 351–368.Google Scholar
  68. Stürmer, K. and Seidel, T. (2015) Assessing Professional Vision in Teacher Candidates. Approaches to Validating the Observer Extended Research Tool’, Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223(1): 54–63.Google Scholar
  69. Tatto, M. T., Schwille, J., Senk, S.L., Ingvarson, L., Rowley, G., Peck, R., Bankov, K., Rodgriguez, M. and Reckase, M. (2012) ‘The Mathematics Teacher Education and Development Study (TEDS-M). Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M)’, Amsterdam: IEA.Google Scholar
  70. Weinert, F.E. (2001) ‘Concepts of competence: a conceptual clarification’, in D.S. Rychen and L.H. Salgnik (eds). Defining and selecting key competencies, Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
  71. Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J. and Blömeke, S. (2018) ‘Professional Noticing of Mathematics Teachers: a Comparative Study Between Germany and China’, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, advance online publication June 19,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9907-x.
  72. Zeichner, K. (2012) ‘The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education’, Journal of Teacher Education 63(5): 376–382.Google Scholar
  73. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Pant, H.A., Lautenbach, C., Molerov, D., Toepper, M. and Brückner, S. (2017) ‘Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education’, Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversität HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Learning Sciences and Teacher EducationAustralian Catholic UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of Human SciencesUniversität zu KölnCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations