Is It Still Worth Working In Academia? The Views from Portuguese Academics
- 48 Downloads
This paper analyses academics’ perceptions about their current working and employment conditions, academic profession’s social prestige and their willingness to change profession. The aim is to discuss the extent to which academics are being affected by changes in higher education institutions and the academic profession as framed by managerialism, New Public Management and neoliberalism. Collected through a survey to all Portuguese academics, perceptions suggest a contradiction: while evidencing the deterioration of working conditions, academics maintain a positive view regarding the academic profession, evidenced by a predisposition to consider it as socially valued and worth to recommend. So, despite all changes, it seems that to Portuguese academics, working in academia is still worth, at least to some extent. The question is to know for how long.
Keywordsacademic profession managerialism New Public Management neoliberalism Portugal working conditions
- Aarrevaara, T., Dobson, I. and Wikström, J. (2015) ‘Changing Employment and Working Conditions’, in T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec and B. Kehm (eds.) Academic Work and Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
- Becher, T. and Trowler, P. (2001) Academic Tribes and Territories. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B. and Musselin. C. (2011) ‘New public management, network governance and the university as a changing professional organization’, in T. Christensen and P. Laegreid (eds.) The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 161–176.Google Scholar
- Carvalho, T. and Bruckmann, S. (2014) ‘Reforming Portuguese public sector: a route from health to higher education’, in C. Musselin and P.N. Teixeira (eds.) Reforming Higher Education Public Policy Design and Implementation, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 83–102.Google Scholar
- Carvalho, T., Cardoso, S. and Sousa, S. (2014) ‘Changes in the institutional context and academic profession — a case from Portugal’, in K. Prpić, I. van der Weijden and N. Asheulova (eds.). (Re)Searching Scientific Careers, S. Petersburg: IHST, RAS, Nestor-Historia, SSTNET & ESA, pp. 117–144.Google Scholar
- Carvalho, T. and Santiago, R. (2016) ‘Transforming professional bureaucracies in hospitals and higher education institutions’, in R. Pinheiro, L. Geschwind, F. Ramirez and K. Vrangbæk (eds.) Towards a Comparative Institutionalism: Forms, Dynamics and Logics Across the Organizational Fields of Health Care and Higher Education, London: Emerald, pp. 243–269.Google Scholar
- DGEEC — Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência (2016a) Perfil do docente do ensino superior — 2015/16, http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/EstatDocentes/, accessed October 2016.
- DGEEC — Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência (2016b) Inscritos [1995/1996 a 2015/2016], http://www.dgeec.mec.pt/np4/EstatVagasInsc/, accessed October 2016.
- Enders, J. and De Weert (Eds.) (2004) The International Attractiveness of the Academic Workplace in Europe, Frankfurt: Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
- Lipman, P. (2011) The New Political Economy of Urban Education: Neoliberalism, Race, and the Right to the City, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, P., Carvalho, T., Vabø, A. and Cardoso, S. (2015) ‘Gender in Higher Education: A Critical Review’, in J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. Dill, and M. Souto-Otero (eds.) The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 569–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Santiago, R. and Carvalho, T. (2016) ‘The “dark side” of the moon: The “non-teaching” structures in the Portuguese Higher Education Institutions’, in C. Sarrico, P. Teixeira, A. Magalhães, A. Veiga, M.J. Rosa, and T. Carvalho (eds.) Global Challenges, National Initiatives, and Institutional Responses – The Transformation of Higher Education, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 55–76.Google Scholar