Not All Managers Are Managerial: A Self-Evaluation of Women Middle-Managers’ Experiences in a UK University

  • Madi RubyEmail author
Original Article

The focus of this small-scale self-evaluation is the implementation of a new middle-management role in a post-92 UK university. A realist appreciative inquiry was undertaken with five women who had been promoted to a middle-management role 18 months prior to the inquiry. This evaluation for knowledge offered an opportunity to reflect on experiences in practice and sought to understand the experiences of the women in this role and how they cope with the challenges middle-management brings. Particular challenges (instability-generating) accorded with existing literature and included: lack of role clarity, lack of pre-preparation for management role, colleagues’ views of management, including perceptions of women in management roles and malicious intent of managed academics in rare cases. Supportive factors (provisional-stability-generating) included: personal resilience, informal peer support, external support and reflection. The co-evaluators offered reflections for the future from this co-evaluation. These suggest that training may contribute to provisional-stability in role and should be considered for new entrants to middle-management. The alternative construct of humanistic management is proposed as a way of understanding these women’s values-based decision-making practices in complex situations.


women middle-management managerialism humanistic management higher education 



The author acknowledges the support of academic staff on the Doctoral Programme in Higher Education Research, Evaluation and Enhancement at Lancaster University from which this publication has arisen,-evaluation-and-enhancement/.


  1. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness, Oxford: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Asch, S.E. (1951) ‘Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments’, in H. Guetzkow (ed). Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations, Oxford: Carnegie Press, pp. 177–190.Google Scholar
  3. Berne, E. (1964) The games people play, New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  4. Birds, R. (2014) ‘Middle managers in UK higher education conceptualising experiences in support of reflective practice’, Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 18(3): 90–98.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs, A.R.J. (2007) ‘Exploring professional identities: middle leadership in further education colleges’, School Leadership and Management 27(5): 471–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brundrett, M. (1998) ‘What lies behind collegiality, legitimation or control? An analysis of the purported benefits of collegial management in education’, Educational Management Administration and Leadership 26(3): 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burawoy, M. (1998) ‘The extended case method’, Sociological Theory 16(1): 4–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bush, T. (1995) Theories of educational management (2nd edition), London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Chelimsky, E. (1996) ‘Thoughts for a new evaluation society’, Evaluation 3(1): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clegg, S. and McAuley, J. (2005) ‘Conceptualising middle management in higher education: a multifaceted discourse’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27(1): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooperrider, D.L., Whitney, D. and Stavros, J.M. (2008) Appreciative inquiry handbook for leaders of change, Brunswick: Crown Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Deem, R. (1998) ‘‘New Managerialism’ and higher education: the management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom’, International Studies in Sociology of Education 8(1): 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deem, R. and Brehony, K.J. (2005) ‘Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education’, Oxford Review of Education 31(2): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dierksmeier, C. (2016) ‘What is ‘Humanistic’ about humanistic management?’ Humanist Management Journal 1(1): 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Floyd, A. (2016) ‘Supporting academic middle managers in higher education: do we care?’, Higher Education Policy 29(2): 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Floyd, A. and Dimmick, C. (2011) ‘‘Jugglers’, ‘copers and ‘strugglers’: academics’ perceptions of being a head of department in apost-1992 UK university and how it influences their future careers’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33(4): 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman, E.R. (2018) ‘The “Business Sucks” story’, Humanistic Management Journal 3(1): 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hellawell, D. and Hancock, N. (2001) ‘A case study of the changing role of the academic middle manager in higher education: between hierarchical control and collegiality?’, Research Papers in Education 16(2): 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. House, E.R. (2006) ‘Democracy and evaluation’, Evaluation 12(1): 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolsaker, A. (2008) ‘Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: a study of English universities’, Studies in Higher Education 33(5): 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kostera, M. (2016) ‘Humanistic Management’, in B. Czarniawska (ed). A research agenda for management and organization studies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kotter, J.P. (2014) XLR8, Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kubler-Ross, E. (1969) On death and dying, New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  24. Lewin, K. (1958) ‘Group decision and social change’, in E. Maccoby, T. Newcomb and E. Hartley (eds). Readings in Social Psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 197–211.Google Scholar
  25. Milgram, S. (1963) ‘Behavioral study of obedience’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67(4): 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Olsen, W. (2010) ‘Realist methodology: benchmarks in social research methods series’ in W. K. Olsen (ed). Realist Methodology, London: Sage, pp. xix–xlvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Patton, M.Q. (2011) Developmental evaluation: applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use, New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Petticrew, M. and Roberts, H. (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences, Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pirson, M. (2016) ‘Editorial welcome to the humanistic management journal’, Humanistic Management Journal 1(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pirson, M. (2017) Humanistic management: protecting dignity and promoting well-being, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Preston, D. and Price, D. (2012) ‘I see it as a phase: I don’t see it as a future’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 34(4): 409–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prochaska, J. and DiClemente, C. (1983) ‘Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: toward an integrative model of change’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 51(3): 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers, C. (1957) Client-centred therapy, London: Constable.Google Scholar
  34. Rogers, C.R. (1969) Freedom to learn: studies of the person, Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill.Google Scholar
  35. Saunders, M. (2000) ‘Beginning an evaluation with RUFDATA: theorizing a practical approach to evaluation planning’, Evaluation 6(1): 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saunders, M. (2006) ‘The ‘Presence’ of evaluation theory and practice in educational and social development: toward and inclusive approach’, London Review of Education 4(2): 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saunders, M. (2011) ‘Setting the scene: the four domains of evaluative practice in higher education’ in M. Saunders, V. Bamber and P. Trowler (eds). Reconceptualising evaluation in higher education: the practice turn, Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  38. Saunders, M., Charlier, B. and Bonamy, J. (2005) ‘Using evaluation to create provisional stabilities’, Evaluation 11(1): 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Saunders, M. and Sin, C. (2015) ‘Middle managers experience of policy implementation and mediation in the context of the scottish quality enhancement framework’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 40(1): 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Whitchurch, C. and Gordon, G. (2010) ‘Diversifying academic and professional identities in higher education: some management challenges’, Tertiary Education Management 16(2): 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winter, R. (2009) ‘Academic manager, or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31(2): 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winter, R. (2017) Managing academics: a question of perspective, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social and Life SciencesWrexham Glyndŵr UniversityWrexhamUK

Personalised recommendations