Advertisement

Policy Learning in the Development of Bologna Study Cycles in Ukraine

  • Iryna KushnirEmail author
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

This article investigates how policy learning could be used as an analytical tool for studying the development process of Bologna study cycles (Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctorate’s or Ph.D.) in the Ukrainian higher education context. The development of the Bologna study cycles in Ukraine is associated with the fact that Ukraine joined the Bologna process. The findings show that the Bologna study cycles in Ukraine have been developing on the basis of the old national education-qualification and scientific cycles through a so-called process of layering of minor innovations. This layering has been quite productive as it was exercised jointly by multiple policy actors.

Keywords

policy learning layering Bologna study cycles Ukraine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the University of Edinburgh.

References

  1. Alexiadou, N. (2014) ‘Policy learning and Europeanisation in education: the governance of a field and the transfer of knowledge’, in A. Nordin and D. Sundberg (eds.) Transnational Policy Flows in European Education: The Making and Governing of Knowledge in the Education Policy Field, Oxford: Symposium Books, pp. 123–140.Google Scholar
  2. Andreichuk, S.K. (2007) Derzhavne upravlinnya reformuvannya vyshchoyi osvoty v Ukrayini v koneksti Bolonskogo Protsesu [State management of higher education reform in Ukraine in the context of the Bologna Process] (Candidate of Sciences), Lviv, Ukraine: Lviv Regional Institute of State Management. Retrieved 18 December 2018 from http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis64r_81/cgiirbis_64.exe?Z21ID = &I21DBN = ARD&P21DBN = ARD&S21STN = 1&S21REF = 10&S21FMT = fullwebr&C21COM = S&S21CNR = 20&S21P01 = 0&S21P02 = 0&S21P03 = A=&S21COLORTERMS = 1&S21STR = %D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B4%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%87%D1%83%D0%BA%20%D0%A1.%D0%9A$.
  3. Bennett, C.J. and Howlett M. (1992) ‘The lessons of learning: reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change’, Policy Sciences 25(3): 275–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaikie, N.W.H. (2000) Designing social research: the logic of anticipation, Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Borrás, S. (2011) ‘Policy learning and organisational capacities in innovation policies’, Science and Public Policy 38(9): 725–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burch, P. 2007 ‘Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: crafting a wider lens’, Educational Researcher 36(2): 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairney, P. (2011) ‘The New British policy style: from a British to a Scottish political tradition? The New British policy style’, Political Studies Review 9(2): 208–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakroun, B. (2010) ‘National qualification frameworks: from policy borrowing to policy learning’, European Journal of Education 45(2): 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corbett, A. (2011) ‘Ping pong: competing leadership for reform in EU higher education 1998–2006’, European Journal of Education 46(1): 36–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doctoral school at Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (2010) Retrieved 18 December 2018, from https://www.ukma.edu.ua/index.php/science/gradschool.
  11. Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D. (2000) ‘Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making’, Governance 13(1): 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EACEA (Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency), National TEMPUS Office and Shytikova, S. (2012) Higher education in Ukraine, Brussels: EACEA Retrieved 18 December 2018 from http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/tempus/participating_countries/overview/ukraine_tempus_country_fiche_final.pdf.
  13. Enders, J. (2004) ‘Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: recent developments and challenges to governance theory’, Higher Education 47(3): 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finikov, T. (ed.) (2012) Vhodzhennya natsionalnoyi systemy vyshchoyi osvity v Yevropeiskyi prostir vyshchoyi isvity ta naukovoho doslidzhennya [The integration of the national system of higher education into the European space of higher education and research], Kyiv: Takson. Retrieved 18 December 18 from http://www.edupolicy.org.ua/files/Analit12_ua_.pdf.
  15. Freeman, R. 2006. ‘learning in public policy, in M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, R. (2007) ‘epistemological bricolage: how practitioners make sense of learning’, Administration and Society 39(4): 476–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grin, J. and Loeber, A. (2007) ‘Theories of policy learning: agency, structure, and change’, in F. Fischer, G. Miller and M.S. Sidney (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods, Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor and Francis, pp. 201–222.Google Scholar
  18. Haas, P. (2004) ‘When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, P. (1993) ‘Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heikkilla, T. and Gerlak, A.K. (2013) ‘Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: lessons for public policy scholars: lessons for public policy scholars’, Policy Studies Journal 41(3): 484–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koch, J., Eisend, M. and Petermann, A. (2009) ‘Path dependence in decision-making processes: exploring the impact of complexity under increasing returns’, BuR - Business Research 2(1): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kremen, V., Nikolajenko, S., Stepko, M. and European Centre for Higher Education (UNESCO-CEPES) (2006) Higher education in Ukraine, Bucharest: UNESCO-CEPES.Google Scholar
  23. Lange, B. and Alexiadou, N. (2010) ‘Policy learning and governance of education policy in the EU’, Journal of Education Policy 25(4): 443–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levin, B. (2010) ‘An epidemic of education policy: (what) can we learn from each other?’, Comparative Education 34(2): 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lingard, B. (2010) ‘Policy borrowing, policy learning: testing times in Australian schooling’, Critical Studies in Education 51(2): 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering institutions: the organisational basis of politics, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marsh, D. and Sharman, J.C. (2009) ‘Policy diffusion and policy transfer’, Policy Studies 30(3): 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. May, P. (1992) ‘Policy learning and failure’, Journal of Public Policy 12(4): 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merriam, S.B. (2009) Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Peck, J. (2011) ‘Geographies of policy: from transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation’, Progress in Human Geography 35(6): 773–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pyykkö, R. (2008) ‘Bachelors for Europe, specialisty for the fatherland: Bologna through Russian eyes’, Slavica Helsingiensia 35: 331–337.Google Scholar
  32. Radaelli, C.M. and Dunlop, C.A. (2013) ‘Learning in the European Union: theoretical lenses and meta-theory’, Journal of European Public Policy 20(6): 923–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raffe, D. and Semple, S. (2011) Policy borrowing or policy learning?: How (not) to improve education systems, Edinburgh: Centre for Educational Sociology.Google Scholar
  34. Rubin, H.J. and Rubin, I. (2012) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data (3rd ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Sabatier, P.A. and Jenkins-Smith, S. (1999) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment’, in P.A. Sabatier (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 117–166.Google Scholar
  36. Schmidt, V.A. (2010) ‘Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “new institutionalism’, European Political Science Review 2(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2002) ‘Reterritorialising educational import: explorations into the politics of educational borrowing’, in A. Nóvoa and M. Lawn (eds.) Fabricating Europe. The Formation of an Education Space, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004) ‘Conclusion: blazing a trail for policy theory and practice’, in The Global Politics of Educational Borrowing and Lending, New York: Teachers College Press, pp. 201–217.Google Scholar
  39. Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2006) ‘The economics of policy borrowing and lending: a study of late adopters’, Oxford Review of Education 32(5): 665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone, D. (2012) ‘Transfer and translation of policy’, Policy Studies 33(6): 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Talanova, Z. (2014) ‘Vprovadzhennya tryoh tsykliv vyshchoyi osvity [The implementation of three cycles of higher education]’, in V. Luhovy and S. Kalashnikova (eds.) Pravovi zasadu realizaciyi Bologskogo Protsesu v Ukrayini [Legal basis of the implementation of the Bologna Process in Ukraine], Kyiv: DP NVTS Prioritety, pp. 25–35. Retrieved 18 December 18 from http://www.irf.ua/knowledgebase/publications/pravovi_zasadi_realizatsii_bolonskogo_protsesu_v_ukraini/.
  42. Thelen, K. (2003) ‘How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis’, in J. Mahoney and D. Rueschemeyer (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trowler, P. (2001) ‘Introduction: Higher Education Policy, Institutional Change’, Higher Educational Policy and Institutional Change: Intentions and Outcomes in Turbulent Environments, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar
  44. Wolczuk, K. (2009) ‘Implementation without coordination: the impact of EU conditionality on Ukraine under the European Neighbourhood Policy’, Europe-Asia Studies 61(2): 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarkin, M.J. (2008) ‘Organisational learning in novel policy situations: two cases of United states communications regulation’, Policy Studies 29(1): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association of Universities 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Institute of EducationNottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations