Advertisement

European Political Science

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 24–36 | Cite as

Reflexive technopopulism: Podemos and the search for a new left-wing hegemony

  • Alexandros KioupkiolisEmail author
  • Francisco Seoane Pérez
Symposium

Abstract

Its reliance on social media and television to mobilise supporters and popularise the figure of its charismatic leader, political science lecturer Pablo Iglesias, is one of the main characteristic features of Podemos, a new, left-leaning populist party that has shaken the political establishment of Spain since its irruption as a decisive political force in the 2014 European elections. Podemos could actually be defined as a ‘transmedia party’, as it combines the use of social media to reach young constituents with traditional TV talk show appearances to reach a wider, and also older, audience. This dualism (traditionalism and innovation) is also present in Podemos’ own configuration as a blend of a social movement and a vertically ruled political party, with a simultaneous presence outside and inside representative structures like parliaments and local governments. Far from hiding from recurrent accusations of populism, Podemos takes pride in being considered a populist movement. Actually, their leaders see their party-cum-movement as a practical implementation of the theories of the Argentinean philosopher Ernesto Laclau: their left-leaning populist formation is the necessary vanguard of a new democratic majority that will replace the current neoliberal hegemony. This unusual reflexivity is studied through a critical discourse analysis of published interviews with Podemos’ leaders.

Keywords

Podemos Populism Spain Social movements Social media Laclau 

References

  1. Aguiló, A. 2014. El poder popular ante el nuevo ciclo electoral. publico.es, April 18. http://goo.gl/TlvBwi. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  2. Alemán, J. 2015. El factor Laclau en la nueva izquierda española. pagina12.com, January 20. http://goo.gl/vXmNaQ. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  3. Antentas, J.M. 2016. El desconcierto de una noche de verano. Viento Sur, June 29. http://goo.gl/rdK6Kf. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  4. Bobba, G. 2018. Social media populism: Features and ‘likeability’ of Lega Nord communication on Facebook. European Political Science.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0141-8.
  5. Carvajal, Á. 2015. La participación en Podemos sigue en caída libre. El Mundo, April 4. https://goo.gl/7LPAQp. Accessed 21 July 2017.
  6. Casero-Ripollés, A., R.A. Feenstra, and S. Tormey. 2016. Old and new media logics in an electoral campaign: The case of Podemos and the two-way street mediatization of politics. International Journal of Press/Politics 21(3): 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Centro de investigaciones sociológicas (CIS), Ministerio de la Presidencia. 2015a. Barómetro de enero 2015. Estudio no. 3050. http://goo.gl/vyemOU. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  8. Centro de investigaciones sociológicas (CIS) Ministerio de la Presidencia. 2015b. Barómetro de abril 2015. Estudio no. 3080. http://goo.gl/vyemOU. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  9. Clavell, G.G. 2015. Podemos y la política de la tecnología. Teknokultura 12(1): 111–119.Google Scholar
  10. Crouch, C. 2014. Post-democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  11. del Barrio, A. 2014. Los claves del éxito de Podemos: “No somos herederos del 15-M”. El Mundo, May 26. http://goo.gl/u7f6rh. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  12. Del Ser, G. 2014. La infraestructura de Podemos vive en la red. El País, November 15. http://goo.gl/LMOqYH. Accessed 13 October 2016.
  13. Delclos, C. 2014. Podemos: The political upstart taking Spain by force. RΟΑR Magazine, December 9. http://goo.gl/aR9qBu. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  14. Domínguez, A. 2014. “Nos encontramos en un momento de transición hacia otro régimen político”: entrevista a Pablo Iglesias. In Claro que Podemos: De “La Tuerka” a la esperanza del cambio en España, ed. A. Domínguez and L. Giménez, 141–164. Barcelona: Los Libros del Lince.Google Scholar
  15. Errejón Galván, I. 2011a. La construcción discursiva de identidades populares. Viento Sur 114: 75–84.Google Scholar
  16. Errejón Galván, I. 2011b. Evo pueblo. La construcción hegemónica del MAS en Bolivia. In Del asalto a la transformación del Estado en Bolivia, ed. I. Errejón and A. Serrano, 111–141. Barcelona: Viejo Topo.Google Scholar
  17. Errejón Galván, I. 2014. ¿Qué es « Podemos »? Le Monde diplomatique en español 225. http://goo.gl/snG6O7. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  18. Espinoza Pino, M. 2014. Podemos: ¿Es la hora de la gente?. madrilonia.org, November 18. http://goo.gl/Npp3p2/. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  19. Flesher Fominaya, C. 2014. Spain is different: Podemos and 15M. Open Democracy, May 29. https://goo.gl/cVYDiQ. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  20. Fort Apache. 2014. Podemos y el populismο. November 21. https://goo.gl/dIk1LC. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  21. Fort Apache. 2016. Elecciones sin Sorpasso. July 2. https://goo.gl/Anrgvv. Accessed 7 July 2016.
  22. Franzé, J. 2015. Podemos: ¿regeneración democrática o impugnación del orden? Transición, frontera política y democracia. Cahiers de civilisation espagnole contemporaine. De 1808 au temps présent 15. https://ccec.revues.org/5988?lang=es. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  23. García, A. 2015. El proceso constituyente de Podemos, camino hacia la verticalidad. enlucha, January 4. http://goo.gl/lblBt4. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  24. Gari, M. 2016. El 27J más Unidos y Unidas Podemos. publico.es, June 25. http://goo.gl/8evMbC. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  25. Gómez, L., and Viejo, M. 2014. Las redes de arrastre de Podemos. El País, May 30. https://goo.gl/GZRzsx. Accessed 13 October 2016.
  26. Iglesias, P. 2014a. The left can win. Jacobin, September 12. https://goo.gl/r4lDmG. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  27. Iglesias, P. 2014b. Disputar la democracia: Política para tiempos de crisis. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
  28. Jurado, F. 2014. Podemos: núcleo, entorno y afuera. eldiario.es, November 17. http://goo.gl/Q4C2eC. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  29. Katz, E., and Lazarsfeld, P.F. 2006 [1955]. Personal influence: The part played by the people in the flow of mass communications. Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Kioupkiolis, A. 2016. Podemos: The ambiguous promises of left-wing populism in contemporary Spain. Journal of Political Ideologies 21(2): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laclau, E. 2005. On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  32. Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Lamant, L. 2015. En Espagne, Podemos se déchire sur sa stratégie. Mediapart, May 2. http://goo.gl/J0Si6p. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  34. Lipow, A., and P. Seyd. 1995. Political parties and the challenge to democracy: From steam-engines to techno-populism. New Political Science 17(1–2): 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lloriente, D. 2014. Podemos: A monolithic, vertical, and hierarchical party? tendancecoatesy.wordpress.com, November 22. https://goo.gl/LFq5WP. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  36. Machado, D. 2014. Podemos y la experiencia latinoamericana. diagonalperiodico.net, December 5. https://goo.gl/oQYvwH. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  37. Martínez Alier, J. 2014. Podemos, el Euro-Peronismo. Rebelión, December 27. http://goo.gl/CuLzYH. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  38. Medina, J.T. 2015. Una mirada tecnopolítica al primer año de Podemos. Seis hipótesis. Teknokultura 12(1): 121–135.Google Scholar
  39. Medina, I., and P. Correa. 2016. The 2015 Spanish election: The times they are a’changing. Regional & Federal Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2016.1176920.Google Scholar
  40. Monedero, J.M., A. San Juan, et al. 2014a. Mover ficha: convertir la indignación en cambio político. http://goo.gl/hE97WW. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  41. Monedero, J.C., A. San Juan, M. Sibina, et al. 2014b. Mover ficha: convertir la indignación en cambio político. http://tratarde.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Manifiesto-Mover-Ficha-enero-de-2014.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2015.
  42. Monedero, J.C. 2016. A la primera no va la vencida. Comiendo Terra, June 27. http://goo.gl/ymV9b8. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  43. Mouffe, C. 2005. On the political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Pastor, J. 2016. El régimen resiste frente a la apuesta por el “cambio”. Viento Sur, June 27. http://goo.gl/eJcu9f. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  45. Pavía, J.M., Bodoque, A., and Martín, J. 2015. Podemos, a hurricane in the Spanish crisis of trust. Analysis and characterization. Universitat de Valencia, March 4. https://goo.gl/BCFbvL.
  46. Pérez Díaz, I. 2017. Análisis discursivo de las corrientes de Iglesias y Errejón: orígenes, confluencia y ruptura en Podemos. Unpublished Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Google Scholar
  47. Pizarro, M.A., and E. Labuske. 2015. El músculo deliberativo del algoritmo democrático: Podemos y la participación ciudadana. Teknokultura 12(1): 93–109.Google Scholar
  48. Podemos. 2014a. Principios Políticos. http://goo.gl/XSHNHH. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  49. Podemos. 2014b. Programa para las elecciones europeas. http://goo.gl/LjUBBE. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  50. Podemos. 2014c. Código Ético. http://goo.gl/87s227. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  51. Ramiro, L., and R. Gómez. 2017. Radical-left populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and its competition with the established radical left. Political Studies 65(15): 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ríos, D. 2016. Iglesias anuncia el fin del “asalto” y el intento de convertir Podemos en una fuerza política “normalizada”. infolibre.es, July 4. http://goo.gl/2cKt3K. Accessed 7 July 2016.
  53. Rivero, J. 2014. Conversación con Pablo Iglesias. Madrid: Ediciones Turpial.Google Scholar
  54. Roberts, K.M. 2015. Populism, political mobilizations, and crises of political representation. In The promise and the perils of populism, ed. C. de la Torre, 140–158. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  55. Rodon, T., and M.J. Hierro. 2016. Podemos and Ciudadanos shake up the Spanish party system: The 2015 local and regional elections. South European Society & Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1151127.Google Scholar
  56. Rodríguez, E. 2016. Por qué ha fracasado Podemos. ctxt.es, June 22. http://goo.gl/msVakV. Accessed 21 July 2016.
  57. Rubiño, E.F. 2015. Nuevas formas de cultura política: Podemos, un giro anómalo de las redes sociales. Teknokultura 12(1): 77–91.Google Scholar
  58. Salgado, S. 2018. Where’s populism? Online media and the diffusion of populist discourses and styles in Portugal. European Political Science.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0137-4.
  59. Salgado, S., and Y. Stavrakakis. 2018. Introduction: Populist discourses and political communication in Southern Europe. European Political Science.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0139-2.
  60. Sampedro, V., and J. Lobera. 2014. The Spanish 15-M movement: A consensual dissent? Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies 15(1–2): 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sánchez, J.D. 2014. Occupy representation: Podemos and the politics of truth. Iohannes Maurus Blogspot, May 31. http://goo.gl/9UoDxB. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  62. Sanz, S. 2015. ¿Quién vota a Pablo Iglesias? vozpopuli.com, February 5. http://goo.gl/aH7v8M. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  63. Seoane Pérez, F. 2014. La política como profesión en la era de Podemos. Comunicación Política, July 26. https://goo.gl/TxGnmb. Accessed 21 July 2017.
  64. Stavrakakis, Y., and G. Katsambekis. 2018. The populism/anti-populism frontier and its mediation in crisis-ridden Greece: From discursive divide to emerging cleavage? European Political Science.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41304-017-0138-3.
  65. Stobart, L. 2014a. Understanding Pοdemos (1/3): 15M & counter-politics. Left Flank, November 5. http://goo.gl/j04qOW. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  66. Stobart, L. 2014b. Understanding Pοdemos (2/3): Radical populism. Left Flank, November 14. http://goo.gl/2FYImV. Accessed 5 January 2015.
  67. Taibo, C. (ed.). 2015. Hasta luego, Pablo. Once ensayos críticos sobre Podemos. Madrid: La Catarata.Google Scholar
  68. Tenhunen, L., and Rodriguez, A. 2014. Podemos: The machine is still under construction. Open Democracy, June 6. https://goo.gl/ysaUXX. Accessed 8 November 2014.
  69. Torreblanca, J.I. 2015. Asaltar los cielos: Podemos o la política después de la crisis. Barcelona: Debate.Google Scholar
  70. Zabala, S. 2014. In Europe, not all populist parties are the same. Aljazeera America, December 2. http://goo.gl/qgVMnR. Accessed 5 January 2015.

Copyright information

© European Consortium for Political Research 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandros Kioupkiolis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francisco Seoane Pérez
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Political Sciences, Faculty of Economic and Political SciencesAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Departamento de Periodismo y Comunicación Audiovisual, Facultad de HumanidadesUniversidad Carlos III de MadridGetafeSpain

Personalised recommendations