Advertisement

Variations in Naturalization Premiums by Country of Origin

  • Miao Chi
  • Michael CoonEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

This study uses the 2013–2017 American Community Survey to explore differences in the returns to obtaining US citizenship for immigrants from the four largest source countries relative to all other immigrants. We find that Chinese, Mexican, and Filipino immigrants face a wage penalty prior to naturalization, while Indian immigrants experience higher wages than other immigrants. Naturalization more than offsets the wage penalty for Chinese and Filipino immigrants and partially offsets the wage penalty for Mexican immigrants. However, naturalized Indian immigrants earn less than non-naturalized Indian immigrants. We find only limited evidence of a naturalization premium for immigrants from other countries.

Keywords

Immigration Naturalization Visa Quotas 

JEL Classification

J31 J38 J61 

Notes

References

  1. Akbari, Ather H. 2008. Immigrant Naturalization and Its Impacts on Immigrant Labour Market Performance And Treasury. In The Economics of Citizenship, ed. Pieter Bevelander and Don J. DeVoretz, 127–154. Holmbergs: MIM/Malmö University.Google Scholar
  2. Aly, Ashraf E.-A., and James F. Ragan Jr. 2010. Arab Immigrants in the United States: How and Why Do Returns to Education Vary By Country of Origin? Journal of Population Economics 23: 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borjas, George. 1985. Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of Immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics 3(4): 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borjas, George. 1995. Assimilation and Changes in Cohort Quality Revisited: What Happened to Immigrant Earnings in the 1980’s? Journal of Labor Economics 13(2): 201–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratsberg, Bernt, James F. Ragan Jr., and Zafar M. Nasir. 2002. The Effect of Naturalization on Wage Growth: a Panel Study of Young Male Immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics 20(3): 568–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiswick, Barry. 1978. The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born Men. Journal of Political Economy 86(5): 897–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiswick, Barry. 1986. Is the New Immigration Less Skilled than the Old? Journal of Labor Economics 4(2): 168–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coon, Michael, and Miao Chi. 2018. Visa Wait Times and Future Earnings: Evidence from the National Survey of College Graduates. Journal of Economics, Race, and Policy..  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41996-018-0024-6.Google Scholar
  9. Corluy, Vincent, Ive Marx, and Gerlinde Verbist. 2011. Employment Chances and Changes of Immigrants in Belgium: The Impact of Citizenship. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 52(4): 350–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeVoretz, Don J., and Sergiy Pivnenko. 2005. The Economic Causes and Consequences of Canadian Citizenship. Journal of International Migration and Integration 6(3): 435–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duleep, Harriet O., and Mark C. Regets. 1997. Measuring Immigrant Wage Growth Using Matched CPS Files. Demography 43(2): 239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Euwals, Rob, Jacob Dagevos, Mérove Gisberts, and Hans Roodenburg. 2010. Citizenship and Labor Market Position: Turkish Immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands. International Migration Review 44(3): 513–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gathmann, Christina, and Nicolas Keller. 2013. Returns to Citizenship: Evidence from Germany’s Immigration Reform. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 4738.Google Scholar
  14. Helgertz, Jonas, Pieter Bevelander, and Anna Tegunimataka. 2014. Naturalization and Earnings: a Denmark-Sweden Comparison. European Journal of Population 30(3): 337–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lalonde, Robert J., and Robert H. Topel. 1992. The Assimilation of Immigrants in the US Labor Market. In Immigration and the Workforce: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas, ed. George J. Borjas and Richard B. Freeman, 67–92. Chicago, Il: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lin, Carl. 2013. Earnings Gap, Cohort Effect and Economic Assimilation of Immigrants from Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan in the United States. Review of International Economics 21(2): 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mazzolari, Francesca. 2009. Dual Citizenship Rights: Do They Make More and Rcher Citizens? Demography 16(1): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pew Research Center. 2015. Modern Immigration Wave Brings 59 Million to U.S., Driving Population Growth and Change Through 2065: Views of Immigration’s Impact on U.S. Society Mixed. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Passel, Jefferey, and D’Vera Cohn. 2019. U.S. Unauthorized Immigrants Are More Proficient in English, More Educated than a Decade Ago. Retreived July 25, 2019 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/05/23/u-s-undocumented-immigrants-are-more-proficient-in-english-more-educated-than-a-decade-ago/.
  20. Reserve Bank of India. 2017. Foreign Exchange Management (Acquisition and Transfer of Immovable Property in India) Regulations, 2000. Retrieved from Foreign Exchange Management Act Notification: https://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_FemaNotifications.aspx?Id=175.
  21. Ruggles, Steven, Sarah Flood, Ronald Goeken, Josiah Grover, Erin Meyer, Jose Pacas, and Matthew Sobek. 2019. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 9.0. University of Minnesota. Retrieved July 17, 2019, from http://www.ipums.org.
  22. Scott, Kirk. 2008. The Economics of Citizenship: Is There a Naturalization Effect? In The Economics of Citizenship, ed. Pieter Bevelander and Don J. DeVoretz, 107–125. Holmbergs: MIM/Malmö University.Google Scholar
  23. Steinhardt, Max F. 2012. Does Citizenship Matter? The Economic Impact of Naturalizations in Germany. Labour Economics 19(6): 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. US Department of Homeland Security. 2015. Yearbook of Immigration Statistics. Retrived from https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/yearbook.
  25. US Department of Homeland Security. 2019. Lawful Permanent Residents Data Tables. Retrived from https://www.dhs.gov/immigration-statistics/lawful-permanent-residents.
  26. US Department of State. 2016. Annual Report of Immigrant Visa Applicants in the Family-sponsored and Employment-based preferences Registered at the National Visa Center. Retrieved from https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Statistics/Immigrant-Statistics/WaitingListItem.pdf.
  27. US Department of State. 2019. Visa Bulletin for June 2019. Retrieved from https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2019/visa-bulletin-for-july-2019.html.
  28. USCIS. 2016a. Citizenship Through Naturalization. Retrieved from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services: https://www.uscis.gov/us-citizenship/citizenship-through-naturalization.
  29. USCIS. 2016b. Per Country Limit. Retrieved from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services: https://www.uscis.gov/tools/glossary/country-limit.
  30. USCIS. 2016c. Visa Availability and Priority Dates. Retrieved from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services: https://www.uscis.gov/green-card/green-card-processes-and-procedures/visa-availability-and-priority-dates.
  31. Wahba, Jackline. 2015. Who Benefits from Return Migration to Developing Countries? IZA World of Labor, 1–10.Google Scholar
  32. Wu, Yujie, and Michael C. Seeborg. 2012. Economic Assimilation of Mexican and Chinese Immigrants in the United States: Is There Wage Convergence? Economics Bulletin 32(3): 1978–1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EEA 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and BusinessDrew UniversityMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Sykes College of BusinessUniversity of TampaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations