Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 115–126 | Cite as

Environmental Reputation: Attribution from Distinct Environmental Strategies

  • Anupam KumarEmail author
Original Article


How do firms risk their environmental reputation by ignoring environmentally detrimental practices? Although there is a heightened emphasis on establishing a favorable environmental reputation, the mechanism connecting firm strategies to reputational outcomes is largely understudied. Firms can pursue distinct environmental management (EM) strategies comprising proactive beyond-compliance voluntary activities (EM strengths) and/or addressing compliance-only detrimental environmental activities (EM concerns). With the capability of selective dissemination of information on their environmental pursuits, the choice of strategy and the mechanisms affecting perception for reputational gains needs further exploration. By applying attribution theory, this paper develops a novel perspective to explain the impact from distinct strategies of pursuing EM strengths and/or addressing EM concerns. Utilizing 2 years of data from the top 500 green ranked U.S. firms, the findings support a negative impact from the attribution of EM concerns under conditions of greater scrutiny. The analysis indicates that strong financial performance as well as an environmental strategy highlighting EM strengths are mechanisms for drawing scrutiny into a firm’s behavior. In doing so, the findings caution practitioners on the latent effect of EM concerns on environmental reputation.


Environmental reputation Environmental strategy Visibility Attribution theory Regression analysis 


  1. AFP. 2008. Volkswagen goes green with Japanese technology, The Local de report, 11 May, Accessed 9 July 2016.
  2. Aiken, L., and S. West. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Amato, L., and C. Amato. 2012. Environmental policy, rankings and stock values. Business Strategy and the Environment 21 (5): 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apple. 2014. Environmental responsibility. Accessed 13 Jun 2016.
  5. Aupperle, K., A. Carroll, and J. Hatfield. 1985. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 28 (2): 446–463.Google Scholar
  6. Babiak, K., and S. Trendafilova. 2011. CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (1): 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballinger, G. 2004. Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods 7 (2): 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bansal, P., and I. Clelland. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal 47 (1): 93–103.Google Scholar
  9. Bansal, P., and Gao, J. 2008. Dual mechanisms of business sustainability: unique effects and simultaneous effects. In annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Barnett, M. 2014. Why stakeholder ignore misconduct: A cognitive view. Journal of Management 32 (3): 794–816.Google Scholar
  11. Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baylis, R., L. Connell, and A. Flynn. 1998. Company size, environmental regulation and ecological modernization: Further analysis at the level of the firm. Business Strategy and the Environment 7 (5): 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Basdeo, D., K. Smith, C. Grimm, V. Rindova, and P. Derfus. 2006. The impact of market actions on firm reputation. Strategic Management Journal 27 (12): 1205–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beder, S. 1997. Global spin: The corporate assault on environmentalism. NY: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Bhattacharya, C., and S. Sen. 2004. Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review 47 (1): 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bowen, F. 2000. Environmental visibility: A trigger of green organizational response? Business Strategy and the Environment 9 (2): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bruno K. 1997. The World of Greenwash, CorpWatch report, 1 January, Accessed 15 July 2016.
  18. Cameron, A., and P. Trivedi. 2010. Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  19. Carcano, L. 2013. Strategic Management and Sustainability in Luxury Companies. Sustainable Luxury: A special theme issue of The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 52: 36.Google Scholar
  20. Chatterji, A., D. Levine, and M. Toffel. 2009. How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 18 (1): 125–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christensen, L., M. Morsing, and O. Thyssen. 2013. CSR as aspirational talk. Organization 20 (3): 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Clarkson, M. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cormier, D., and M. Magnan. 2015. The economic relevance of environmental disclosure and its impact on corporate legitimacy: An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment 24 (6): 431–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deegan, C. 2002. Introduction: the legitimizing effect of social and environmental disclosures-a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 (3): 282–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deephouse, D. 2000. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management 26 (6): 1091–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dowling, G.R., and N.A. Gardberg. 2012. Keeping score: The challenges of measuring corporate reputation. In The Oxford handbook of corporate reputation, ed. M.L. Barnett, and T.G. Pollock, 34–68. Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Eesley, C., and Lenox, M. 2006. Secondary stakeholder actions and the selection of firm targets. In Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 1, B1–B6. Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  28. Elkington, J. 2004. Enter the triple bottom line. The triple bottom line: Does it all add up?, 1–16. New York, NY: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Fombrun, C. 1996. Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fombrun, C., N. Gardberg, and M. Barnett. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review 105 (1): 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fombrun, C., and M. Shanley. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation-building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33 (2): 233–258.Google Scholar
  32. Greene, W. 2000. Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Greening, D., and D. Turban. 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business & Society 39 (3): 254–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hart, O. 1995. Corporate governance: Some theory and implications. The Economic Journal 105 (430): 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hatch, M., and M. Schultz. 2002. The dynamics of organizational identity. Human Relations 55 (8): 989–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G. 2010. Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. w15991, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, J. 2011. Top 10 green marketing campaigns, Ecopreneurist report, Accessed 15 Jun 2016.
  38. Kayser, S., Maxwell, J., and Toffel, M. 2016. Signaling without certification: The critical role of civil society scrutiny, No. 15-009, Harvard Business School Working Papers, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  39. Kelley, H.H. 1972. Attribution in social interaction. In Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior, ed. E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, and B. Weiner, 1–26. Morristown, NJ: Gen. Learn. Press.Google Scholar
  40. Kelley, H., and J. Michela. 1980. Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology 31 (1): 457–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klein, B., and K.B. Leffler. 1981. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. Journal of political Economy 89 (4): 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kumar, A., D. Cantor, C. Grimm, and C. Hofer. 2017. Environmental management rivalry and firm performance. Journal of Strategy and Management 10 (2): 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lange, D., P. Lee, and Y. Dai. 2011. Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management 37 (1): 153–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lenz, I., H.A. Wetzel, and M. Hammerschmidt. 2017. Can doing good lead to doing poorly? Firm value implications of CSR in the face of CSI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 45 (5): 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liang, K., and S. Zeger. 1986. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73 (1): 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lyon, T., and J. Maxwell. 2011. Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20 (1): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mani, M., and D. Wheeler. 1998. In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960 to 1995. The Journal of Environment & Development 7 (3): 215–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mattingly, J., and S. Berman. 2006. Measurement of corporate social action discovering taxonomy in the Kinder Lydenburg Domini ratings data. Business & Society 45 (1): 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGuire, J., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 854–872.Google Scholar
  50. Michelon, G., S. Pilonato, F. Ricceri, and R. Roberts. 2016. Behind camouflaging: Traditional and innovative theoretical perspectives in social and environmental accounting research. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 7 (1): 2–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1986a. Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of Political Economy 94 (4): 796–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1986b. Relying on the information of interested parties. The Rand Journal of Economics 17: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moneva, J., P. Archel, and C. Correa. 2006. GRI and the camouflaging of corporate unsustainability. In Accounting forum 30 (2): 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Roberts, P., and G. Dowling. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (12): 1077–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Russo, M., and P. Fouts. 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal 40 (3): 534–559.Google Scholar
  56. Spiller, S., G. Fitzsimons, J. Lynch Jr., and G. McClelland. 2013. Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research 50 (2): 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strike, V., J. Gao, and P. Bansal. 2006. Being good while being bad: Social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (6): 850–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Suchman, M. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tom, G., and S. Lucey. 1995. Waiting time delays and customer satisfaction in supermarkets. Journal of Services Marketing 9 (5): 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toms, J. 2002. Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. The British Accounting Review 34 (3): 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Walls, J., P. Berrone, and P. Phan. 2012. Corporate governance and environmental performance: Is there really a link? Strategic Management Journal 33 (8): 885–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Walls, J., P. Phan, and P. Berrone. 2011. Measuring environmental strategy: Construct development, reliability, and validity. Business & Society 50 (1): 71–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature & Reputation Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations