Advertisement

Democracy in the Anthropocene

The Politics of the Anthropocene, John S. Dryzek, Jonathan Pickering, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2019, ISBN: 978-0198809623
  • Marit HammondEmail author
  • John DryzekEmail author
  • Jonathan Pickering
Critical Exchange

The Anthropocene is an emerging epoch of human-induced instability in the Earth system. Our book argues that many of the signature problems of the Anthropocene are the product of dominant institutions that emerged in the previous epoch – the Holocene. These institutions remain stuck in ‘pathological path dependencies’ that decouple human institutions from the Earth system by systematically repressing information about ecological conditions and prioritising narrow economic concerns. As an antidote to pathological path dependencies, institutions need to cultivate ecological reflexivity, which refers to the capacity of an entity to recognise and anticipate its impacts on social-ecological systems and listen to feedback from those systems; critically reflect on core values in light of this feedback; and respond by transforming its practices.

Ecological reflexivity requires rethinking the core social values that underpin political institutions, and in successive chapters the book explores...

Notes

References

  1. Arias-Maldonado, M., and Trachtenberg, Z. (Eds.). (2018) Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene: Political Theory and Socionatural Relations in the New Geological Epoch. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Biermann, F., and Lövbrand, E. (Eds.). (2019) Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Böker, M. (2017) Justification, critique and deliberative legitimacy: The limits of mini-publics. Contemporary Political Theory,16(1), 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crutzen, Paul, and Stoermer, Eugene. (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter,41, 17–18.Google Scholar
  5. Curato, N., Hammond, M., and Min, J. B. (2018) Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums, Systems. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Dryzek, J. S. (1987) Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Dryzek, J. S. (1990) Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dryzek, J. S. (1995) Political and ecological communication. Environmental Politics,4(4), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dryzek, J. S., and Pickering, J. (2019) The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forst, R. (2015) Noumenal power. Journal of Political Philosophy,23(2), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freschi, A. C., and Mete, V. (2009) The political meanings of institutional deliberative experiments: Findings on the Italian case. Sociologica,2(3), 1–55.Google Scholar
  13. Goodin, R. (1992) Green Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Hammond, M. (2019a) A cultural account of ecological democracy. Environmental Values,28(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hammond, M. (2019b) Sustainability as a cultural transformation: the role of deliberative democracy. Environmental Politics.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1684731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hammond, M., and Smith, G. (2017) Sustainable prosperity and democracy: A research agenda. CUSP Working Paper No. 8. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  17. Pickering, J. (2018) Ecological reflexivity: Characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene. Environmental Politics,28, 1–22.Google Scholar
  18. Rockström, J. (2015) Bounding the planetary future: Why we need a great transition. Great Transition Initiative (April 2015). Retrieved January 30, 2019, from https://www.greattransition.org/publication/bounding-the-planetary-future-why-we-need-a-great-transition.
  19. Schlosberg, D., Bäckstrand, K., and Pickering, J. (2019) Reconciling ecological and democratic values: Recent perspectives on ecological democracy. Environmental Values,28(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., and McNeill, J. R. (2007) The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio,36(8), 614–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Swift, A., and White, S. (2008) Political theory, social science, and real politics. In D. Leopold and M. Stears (Eds.), Political Theory: Methods and Approaches (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Wapner, P. (2019) The ethics of political research in the Anthropocene. In F. Biermann and E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking (pp. 212–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keele UniversityKeele, Newcastle-under-LymeUK
  2. 2.University of CanberraCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations