Democracy in the Anthropocene
The Anthropocene is an emerging epoch of human-induced instability in the Earth system. Our book argues that many of the signature problems of the Anthropocene are the product of dominant institutions that emerged in the previous epoch – the Holocene. These institutions remain stuck in ‘pathological path dependencies’ that decouple human institutions from the Earth system by systematically repressing information about ecological conditions and prioritising narrow economic concerns. As an antidote to pathological path dependencies, institutions need to cultivate ecological reflexivity, which refers to the capacity of an entity to recognise and anticipate its impacts on social-ecological systems and listen to feedback from those systems; critically reflect on core values in light of this feedback; and respond by transforming its practices.
Ecological reflexivity requires rethinking the core social values that underpin political institutions, and in successive chapters the book explores...
- Arias-Maldonado, M., and Trachtenberg, Z. (Eds.). (2018) Rethinking the Environment for the Anthropocene: Political Theory and Socionatural Relations in the New Geological Epoch. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Biermann, F., and Lövbrand, E. (Eds.). (2019) Anthropocene Encounters: New Directions in Green Political Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Crutzen, Paul, and Stoermer, Eugene. (2000) The ‘Anthropocene’. Global Change Newsletter,41, 17–18.Google Scholar
- Curato, N., Hammond, M., and Min, J. B. (2018) Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums, Systems. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Dryzek, J. S. (1987) Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Dryzek, J. S. (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Freschi, A. C., and Mete, V. (2009) The political meanings of institutional deliberative experiments: Findings on the Italian case. Sociologica,2(3), 1–55.Google Scholar
- Goodin, R. (1992) Green Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Hammond, M., and Smith, G. (2017) Sustainable prosperity and democracy: A research agenda. CUSP Working Paper No. 8. Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
- Pickering, J. (2018) Ecological reflexivity: Characterising an elusive virtue for governance in the Anthropocene. Environmental Politics,28, 1–22.Google Scholar
- Rockström, J. (2015) Bounding the planetary future: Why we need a great transition. Great Transition Initiative (April 2015). Retrieved January 30, 2019, from https://www.greattransition.org/publication/bounding-the-planetary-future-why-we-need-a-great-transition.
- Swift, A., and White, S. (2008) Political theory, social science, and real politics. In D. Leopold and M. Stears (Eds.), Political Theory: Methods and Approaches (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar