Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 940–956 | Cite as

The European Citizens’ Initiative: bringing the EU closer to its citizens?

  • Justin GreenwoodEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In defiance of accounts which see the European Union (EU) as structurally incompatible with democracy, the Lisbon Treaty set out the general right and specific means for citizens to participate in EU decision-making. Whilst the Treaty codified long-established practices of representative democracy and of dialogue with civil society organizations, it also notably introduced a new measure, the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI), commencing in 2012. The ECI has limited formal powers, with no ability to mandate political institutions. It is promoted by the European Commission as an agenda-setting and participatory democracy measure, rather than one of direct democracy. Nonetheless, it has an elevated status within one of the current European Commission’s ten strategic priorities and is remarkable in a number of ways. First, it differs from the European Commission’s established partnerships and dialogue with organized interests by focusing on direct forms of wider citizen participation. Second, it is the world’s first transnational citizens’ initiative, with aspirations to help build an EU-wide public sphere. These aspirations were assessed in a 2017 review of the measure, proposing the introduction of a number of reforms aimed at tackling limited impact to date. This article evaluates the impact of the ECI in its first 5 years and then discusses the proposed reforms in terms of their potential to increase public deliberation. It develops and appraises evaluative criteria that help to assess whether institutionalizing contention, even in ways highly critical of EU institutions, might enhance public deliberation and bring the EU closer to its citizens.

Keywords

European Citizens’ Initiative Lisbon Treaty Democracy Political participation 

References

  1. Allswang, J. 2000. The initiative and referendum in California 1898–1998. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, C., and J. Thomson, eds. 2014. An ECI that works: Learning from the first two years of the European Citizens’ Initiative. Alfter: The ECI Campaign. http://ecithatworks.org/. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  3. Bouza Garcia, L. 2015. Participatory democracy and civil society in the EU. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bouza Garcia, L., and J. Greenwood. 2014. The European Citizens’ Initiative: A new sphere of EU politics? Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(3): 246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conrad, M. 2016. The ECI’s contribution to the emergence of a European public sphere. In Bridging the gap? Opportunities and constraints of the European Citizens’ Initiative, ed. M. Conrad, A. Knaut, and K. Böttger, 64–80. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  6. Crespy, A. 2014. Deliberative democracy and the legitimation of the European Union: A reappraisal of conflict. Political Studies 62(1): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Ville, F., and G. Siles-Brugge. 2015. TTIP: The truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dür, A., and G. Mateo. 2014. Public opinion and interest group influence: How citizen groups derailed the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Journal of European Public Policy 21(8): 1199–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ECI Watch. 2017. AFCO and PETI committees—Exchange of views with first vice-president Frans Timmermans. http://ecas.org/eci-watch-december-2/. Accessed 21 December 2017.
  10. End Ecocide. 2018. End ecocide on earth. https://www.endecocide.org/. Accessed 22 March 2018.
  11. EurActiv. 2011. Experts strive to make citizens’ initiative work. http://www.euractiv.com/future-eu/experts-strive-citizens-initiative-work-news-503261. Accessed 9 February 2014.
  12. European Citizens’ Action Service (ECAS). 2017. ECI Watch, October 2017. http://ecas.org/category/eci-watch/. Accessed 30 October 2017.
  13. European Commission. 2015. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of Regulation (EU) No. 211/2011 on the citizens’ initiative, Brussels, 31.3.2015 COM(2015) 145 final. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-145-EN-F1-1.PDF. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  14. European Commission. 2017a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strasbourg, 24.10.2017, COM(2017) 650 final.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission. 2017b. Commission staff working document, accompanying the document ‘Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Citizens’ Initiative’, SWD(2017) 294 final, 13.9.2017.Google Scholar
  16. European Ombudsman. 2017. Letter from the European Ombudsman to the president of the European Commission containing suggestions for improvement of the European Citizens Initiative procedure. https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/cases/correspondence.faces/en/81311/html.bookmark. Accessed 2 November 2017.
  17. European Parliament Research Service (EPRS). 2015. The European Citizens’ Initiative: The experience of the first three years, PE 536.343. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_IDA(2015)536343. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  18. Follesdal, A. 2015. Democracy, identity and European public spheres. In European public spheres: Politics is back, ed. T. Risse, 247–262. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gherghina, S., and A. Groh. 2016. A poor sales pitch? The European Citizens’ Initiative and attitudes towards the EU in Germany and the UK. European Politics & Society 17(3): 373–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenwood, J. 2015. Civil dialogue and the Citizens’ Initiative: Accounting for collaboration and competition using the advocacy coalition framework and ´the strategic action field. In EU civil society: Patterns of cooperation, competition and conflict, ed. H. Johansson and S. Kalm, 193–209. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Greenwood, J., and K. Tuokko. 2017. The European Citizens’ Initiative: The territorial extension of a European political public sphere? European Politics & Society 18(2): 166–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habermas, J. 1995. Comment on the paper by Dieter Grimm, ‘Does Europe need a constitution’? European Law Journal 1(3): 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habermas, J. 2001. Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review 11(September–October). http://newleftreview.org/II/11/jurgen-habermas-why-europe-needs-a-constitution. Accessed 18 May 2017.
  24. Karatzia, A. 2017. The European Citizens’ Initiative and the EU institutional balance: On realism and the possibilities of affecting EU lawmaking. Common Market Law Review 54(1): 177–208.Google Scholar
  25. Knaut, A. 2016. Rethinking the imaginary of the public sphere: Transnational discursive spaces and the ECI. In Bridging the gap? Opportunities and constraints of the European Citizens’ Initiative, ed. M. Conrad, A. Knaut, and K. Böttger, 47–63. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  26. Kohler Koch, B. 2012. Post-Maastricht civil society and participatory democracy. Journal of European Integration 34(7): 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lutz, G. 2012. Switzerland: Citizens’ initiatives as a measure to control the political agenda. In Citizens’ initiatives in Europe: Procedures and consequences of agenda-setting by citizens, ed. M. Setälä and T. Schiller, 17–36. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks, S. and G. Paravicini. 2017. Fears grow that EU glyphosate ban could disrupt global trade. Politico, 27 October 2017. https://www.politico.eu/article/glyphosate-ban-fears-grow-could-disrupt-global-trade/. Accessed 2 November 2017.
  29. Nugent, N., and M. Rhinard. 2016. Is the European Commission really in decline? Journal of Common Market Studies 54(5): 1199–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oleart, A., and L. Bouza. 2017. Democracy at stake: Multi-positional actors and politicisation in the EU civil society field. Journal of Common Market Studies 56(4): 870–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pfafferott, C. 2013. ECI day in Brussels: Civil society, make it work! http://www.democracy-international.org/eci-day-brussels.html. Accessed 21 December 2017.
  32. Plottke, J. 2016. From consensus to majoritarian EU level democracy? The ECI as an example of constitutional change. In Bridging the gap? Opportunities and constraints of the European Citizens’ Initiative, ed. M. Conrad, A. Knaut, and K. Böttger, 169–198. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  33. Qvortrup, M. 2012. The legislative initiative: A comparative analysis of the domestic experiences in EU countries. In Empowerment and disempowerment of the European citizen, ed. M. Dougan, N. Shuibhne, and E. Spaventa, 291–304. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
  34. Risse, T. 2015a. Introduction. In European public spheres: Politics is back, ed. T. Risse, 1–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Risse, T. 2015b. European public spheres, the politicization of EU affairs, and its consequences. In European public spheres: Politics is back, ed. T. Risse, 141–164. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Saward, M. 2013. Enacting European citizenship and democracy in Europe. In Enacting European citizenship, ed. E. Isin and M. Saward, 220–237. Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schiller, T., and M. Setälä. 2012a. Introduction. In Citizens’ initiatives in Europe: Procedures and consequences of agenda-setting by citizens, ed. M. Setälä and T. Schiller, 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Schiller, T., and M. Setälä. 2012b. Comparative findings. In Citizens’ initiatives in Europe: Procedures and consequences of agenda-setting by citizens, ed. M. Setälä and T. Schiller, 243–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, D., and C. Tolbert. 2004. Educated by initiative: The effect of direct democracy on citizens and political organizations in the American states. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. STOP TTIP. 2018. European initiative against TTIP and CETA. https://stop-ttip.org/. Accessed 22 March 2018.
  41. Van de Steeg, M. 2010. Theoretical reflections on the public sphere in the European Union: A network of communication or a political community? In Mapping the European public sphere: Institutions, media and civil society, ed. C. Bee and E. Bozzini, 30–45. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  42. Vogiatzis, N. 2017. Between discretion and control: Reflections on the institutional position of the commission within the European citizens’ initiative process. European Law Journal 23(3–4): 250–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Warleigh-Lack, A. 2007. On the path to legitimacy. In Governance and civil society in the European Union, ed. C. Ruzza and V. Della Sala. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aberdeen Business SchoolRobert Gordon UniversityAberdeenScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations