Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 813–831 | Cite as

The conditioning effect of EU membership status: understanding compliance with legislative initiatives to protect trafficking victims

  • Maureen StobbEmail author
  • Charlotte McDonald
Original Article
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

European countries face a tremendous challenge in coping with human trafficking, a challenge that has been exacerbated by the increase in irregular forms of migration to Europe since 2015. European Union members have made progress in developing a legal framework to protect trafficking victims. Yet attempts to coordinate national laws fail to address the growing problem. Research is needed to understand why states fall short of EU goals. Through case studies of Germany, Hungary and Turkey, we examine the extent to which adoption of the European Union’s Council Framework Decision on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings is associated with positive domestic changes. We focus on the effect of European Union membership status on implementation of victim protection policy. The results suggest that powerful EU members need incentives to cooperate that exceed costs, while capacity-building measures would likely drive change for candidates and newer members. Our findings help scholars predict when European legislative initiatives will likely translate into better domestic anti-trafficking measures. The findings also have broader implications for cooperative efforts in migration control and human rights protection.

Keywords

EU directives and compliance European Union Human trafficking Victim protection 

References

  1. Amnesty International. 2013. Gezi Park Protests: Brutal Denial of the Right to Peaceful Assembly in Turkey. Amnesty International Report. https://www.amnestyusa.org/files/eur440222013en.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  2. Amnesty International. 2015. Global Refugee Crisis by the Numbers. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/10/global-refugee-crisis-by-the-numbers/. Accessed 30 May 2015.
  3. Bartilow, H. 2010. Gender Representation and International Compliance against Human Trafficking, mimeo, Department of Political Science, University of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  4. BBC News. 2013. Q&A: Hungary’s Controversial Constitutional Changes. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-21748878. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  5. BBC News. 2016. Migrant Crisis: EU and Turkey Hold ‘Difficult’ Summit. ​http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35741494. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  6. BBC News. 2018. Erodgan’s Turkey. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/resources/idt-sh/Erdogans_Turkey. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  7. Bell, S.R., and V. Banks. 2017. Women’s Rights Organizations and Human Trafficking. Social Science Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Börzel, T.A., T. Hofmann, D. Panke, and C. Sprungk. 2010. Obstinate and Inefficient: Why Member States do not Comply with European Law. Comparative Political Studies 43 (11): 1363–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baele, S.J., and O.C. Sterck. 2015. Diagnosing the Securitization of Immigration at the EU Level: A New Method for Stronger Empirical Claims. Political Studies 63 (5): 1120–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canveren, O., and F.A. Durakçay. 2017. The Analysis of the Hungarian Government’s Discourse Towards the Migrant Crisis: A Combination of Securitization and Euroscepticism. Yönetim ve Ekonomi 24 (3): 857–876.Google Scholar
  11. Chayes, A., and A.H. Chayes. 1993. On Compliance. International Organization 47 (2): 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cho, S.Y., and K.C. Vadlamannati. 2011. Compliance with the Anti-trafficking Protocol. European Journal of Political Economy 28 (2012): 249–265.Google Scholar
  13. Cho, S.Y. 2012. Human Trafficking: Germany Only Average When It Comes to Protecting Victims. DIW Economic Bulletin 2: 3–9.Google Scholar
  14. Cho, S.Y., A. Dreher, and E. Neumayer. 2014. Determinants of Anti-trafficking Policies: Evidence from a New Index. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 116 (2): 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cho, S.Y., Dreher, A., and Neumayer, E. 2017. “3P” Anti-trafficking Policy Index—Data and Reports. http://www.economics-human-trafficking.org/data-and-reports.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
  16. Cole, W.M. 2015. Mind the Gap: State Capacity and the Implementation of Human Rights Treaties. International Organization 69 (2): 405–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA of 19 July 2002 on combating trafficking in human beings. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=LEGISSUM:l33137&from=EN. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  18. Council of Europe. 2018. Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings, GRETA. https://www.coe.int/en/web/anti-human-trafficking/greta. Accessed 25 Jan 2018.
  19. Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA. https://ec.europa.eu/anti-trafficking/sites/antitrafficking/files/directive_thb_l_101_15_april_2011_1.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  20. Eriksson, M. 2013. The Prevention of Human Trafficking—Regulating Domestic Criminal Legislation Through the European Convention on Human Rights. Nordic Journal of International Law 82 (3): 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. European Commission. 2017a. Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Accessed 19 Jan 2017.
  22. European Commission. 2017b. Eurostat Statistics Explained: Asylum Statistics. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_statistics. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  23. European Union. 2017c. European Union: Countries. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries_en. Accessed 20 Mar 2017.
  24. European Commission. 2018. Public Opinion: Eurobarometer Interactive. http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Chart/getChart/themeKy/59/groupKy/279. Accessed 6 Feb 2018.
  25. Frank, R.W. 2013. Human Trafficking Indicators, 2000–2011: A New Dataset. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2314157 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2314157. Accessed 25 Jan 2017.
  26. Freedom House. 2018. Nations in Transit: Hungary. https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2007/hungary. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  27. ForeignAssistance.gov. 2017. http://beta.foreignassistance.gov/#explore. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  28. Galtung, F. 2000. A Global Network to Curb Corruption: The Experience of Transparency International. In The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, ed. A.M. Florini. Washington, DC: Japan Center for International Exchange, Tokyo and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  29. Gibson, J., and G. Caldiera. 1995. The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support and the European Court of Justice. American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 459–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giorgi, A., and T. Vitale. 2017. Migrants in the Public Discourse: Between Media, Policy, and Public Opinion. In Trade Unions and Migrant Workers: New Contexts and Challenges in Europe, ed. S. Marino, J. Roosblad, and R. Pennix. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  31. Goodman, R., and D. Jinks. 2004. How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law. Duke Law Review 54 (3): 621–703.Google Scholar
  32. Hathaway, O. 2002. Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? The Yale Law Journal 111 (8): 1935–2042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hathaway, O. 2005. Between Power and Principle: An Integrated Theory of International Law. University of Chicago Law Review 72 (2): 469–536.Google Scholar
  34. Helfferich, B., and F. Kolb. 2001. Multilevel Action Coordination in European Contentious Politics: The Case of the European Women’s Lobby. In Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity, ed. D. Imig, and S. Tarrow, 143–161. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Icduygu, A. 2015. Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The Long Road Ahead. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/syrian-refugees-turkey-long-road-ahead. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  36. Ilsley, N. 2015. Why Germany is More Accepting of Asylum Seekers than the rest of Europe. Newsweek. http://www.newsweek.com/migrants-germantgermanyasylum-seekersacceptingeu-migrant-crisismigrantsangela-600872. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  37. InsideGov. 2017. US Foreign Assistance to Germany. InsideGov. http://us-foreign-aid.insidegov.com/l/66/Germany. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  38. International Monetary Fund. 2016. The Refugee Surge in Europe: Economic Challenges. http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2016/12/31/The-Refugee-Surge-in-Europe-Economic-Challenges-43609. Accessed 16 Feb 2017.
  39. International Organization for Migration. (2018) Global Compact for Migration, IOM Thematic Papers: Combating Trafficking in Persons and Contemporary Forms of Slavery. https://www.iom.int/iom-thematic-papers. Accessed 6 Feb 2018.
  40. Inter-Parliamentary Union. 2017. Women in National Parliaments. Inter-Parliamentary Union. http://www.ipu.org/WMN-e/classif.htm. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
  41. Keck, M., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  42. Keith, L.C. 2010. Human Rights Instruments. In The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, ed. P. Cane, and H.M. Kritzer, 351–373. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. King, D., P. Le Gales, and T. Vitale. 2017. Assimilation, Security, and Borders in the Member States. In Reconfiguring European States in Crisis, ed. D. King, and P. Le Gales, 428–450. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keohane, R.O., and J. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  45. Landman, T. 2005. Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lebeck, C. 2007. Sliding Towards Supranationalism? The Constitutional Status of the EU Framework Decisions After Pupino. German Law Journal 8 (5): 501–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lupu, Y. 2015. Legislative Veto Players and the Effects of International Human Rights Agreements. American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 578–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marks, G., and D. McAdam. 1999. On the Relationship of Political Opportunities to the Form of Collective Action: The Case of the European Union. In Social Movements in a Globalizing World, ed. D. della Porta, H. Kriesi, and D. Rucht, 97–111. New York: Saint Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maurice, E. 2015. Merkel Pushes for Turkey EU Membership Talks. https://euobserver.com/enlargement/130735. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  50. Molodikova, I.N., and A.V. Lyalina. 2017. Territorial Differences in the Attitudes to the Migration Crisis in Germany: The Political Aspect. Baltic Region 9 (2): 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murdie, A., and D. Peksen. 2015. Women’s Rights INGO Shaming and the Government Respect for Women’s Rights. Review of International Organizations 10: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Papademetriou, T. 2009. Cyprus; European Union; Turkey: Cyprus Sets Stumbling Blocks to Turkey’s Accession Negotiations. http://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/cyprus-european-union-turkey-cyprus-sets-stumbling-blocks-to-turkeys-accession-negotiations/. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  53. Phillips, A. 1991. Engendering Democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Risse, T., and K. Sikkink. 1999. The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: Introduction. In The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, ed. T. Risse, S.C. Ropp, and K. Sikkink, 1–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Simmons, B.A. 2009. Mobilizing Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tallberg, J. 2002. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union. International Organization 56 (3): 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. The Guardian. 2016. Hungarian Prime Minister Says Migrants are ‘poison’ and ‘not needed’. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/26/hungarian-prime-minister-viktor-orban-praises-donald-trump. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  58. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2007. Formerly the European Economic Community Treaty of 1952. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  59. Tutton, M. 2017. 40 Million Slaves in the World, Finds New Report. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/19/world/global-slavery-estimates-ilo/index.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  60. United Nations Treaty Collection. 2017. Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, Supplementing the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, 2000. Status of Ratification. https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XVIII-12-a&chapter=18&clang=_en. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  61. UN Women. 2017. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women. Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, States Parties. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/states.htm. Accessed 30 May 2017.
  62. United States Department of State. 2016. Trafficking in Persons Report. https://www.state.gov/j/tip/rls/tiprpt/2016/index.htm. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
  63. van den Anker, C., and I. van Liempt. 2012. Introduction: The Wider Context of Trafficking for Forced Labour. In Human Rights and Migration: Trafficking for Forced Labour, ed. C. van den Anker, and I. van Liempt, 1–14. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  64. Vanhala, L. 2011. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  66. Wotopika, C.M., and F.O. Ramirez. 2007. World Society and Human Rights: An Event History Analysis of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy, ed. G. Garnett, F. Dobbin, and B.A. Simmons, 303–343. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. World Bank. 2017. World Bank Open Data. The World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed 20 Feb 2017.
  68. World Values Survey. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp. Accessed 1 Feb 2018.
  69. Yasin, Sarah. 2013. Germany Stalls Turkey EU Talks Over Unrest. https://www.indexoncensorship.org/2013/06/germany-blocks-next-step-for-turkey-eu-bid-for-unrest/. Accessed 25 May 2017.
  70. Yoo, E., and E.H. Boyle. 2015. National Human Trafficking Initiatives: Dimensions of Policy Diffusion. Law and Social Inquiry 40 (3): 631–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International StudiesGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations