Advertisement

Equalities ‘devolved’: experiences in mainstreaming across the UK devolved powers post-Equality Act 2010

  • Olena Hankivsky
  • Diego de Merich
  • Ashlee Christoffersen
Original Article

Abstract

In an increasing number of jurisdictions, gender mainstreaming approaches have been supplemented with attention to other equality areas, including race and disability. The UK is among the most advanced countries in mainstreaming ‘equality’, with nine equality areas protected in law and a joined-up equality infrastructure. Among the nations of the UK there are, however, important distinctions in implementation of the law. In this article, we present findings of cross sectoral qualitative research (with academic, public and third sectors) aimed at understanding the progress of equality mainstreaming in the UK some years on from the implementation of the Equality Act 2010, with a specific focus on the devolved administrations of Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. We identify areas of progress as well as barriers to change and proposed solutions for the future.

Keywords

Equality Act 2010 UK devolved powers Gender mainstreaming Equalities Intersectionality 

Notes

References

  1. Allwood, G. 2013. Gender Mainstreaming and Policy Coherence for Development: Unintended Gender Consequences and EU Policy. Women’s Studies International Forum 39: 42–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthias, F. 2013. Intersectional What? Social Divisions, Intersectionality and Levels of Analysis. Ethnicities 13 (1): 3–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796812463547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacchi, C. 2017. Policies as Gendering Practices: Re-viewing Categorical Distinctions. Journal of Women, Politics, and Policy 38 (1): 20–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacchi, C., and J. Eveline. 2010. Mainstreaming Politics: Gendering Practices and Feminist Theory. Adelaide, SA: The University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benschop, Y., and M. Verloo. 2011. Gender Change, Organizational Change and Gender Equality Strategies. In Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization, ed. Emma Jeanes, David Knights, and Patricia Yancey-Martin, 277–290. Londen: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bose, C.E. 2012. Intersectionality and Global Gender Inequality. Gender & Society 26 (1): 67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211426722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavaghan, Rosalind. 2017. Making Gender Equality Happen: Knowledge, Change and Resistance in EU Gender Mainstreaming. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaney, P. 2011. Quasi-federalism and the Administration of Equality and Human Rights: Recent Developments and Future Prospects—A Preliminary Analysis from the UK’s Devolution Programme. Public Policy and Administration 27 (1): 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaney, P. 2012. New Legislative Settings and the Application of the Participative-Democratic Model of Mainstreaming Equality in Public Policy Making: Evidence from the UK’s Devolution Programme. Policy Studies 33: 455–476.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.722287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choo, H.Y. 2012. The Transnational Journey of Intersectionality. Gender & Society 26 (1): 40–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211426724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chow, E.N.-L., M.T. Segal, and T. Lin. 2011. Analyzing Gender, Intersectionality, and Multiple Inequalities: Global, Transnational and Local Contexts (Advances in Gender Research). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chun, J.J., G. Lipsitz, and Y. Shin. 2013. Intersectionality as a Social Movement Strategy: Asian Immigrant Women Advocates. Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38 (4): 917–940.  https://doi.org/10.1086/669575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clucas, R. 2012. Religion, Sexual Orientation and the Equality Act 2010: Gay Bishops in the Church of England Negotiating Rights Against Discrimination. Sociology 46 (5): 936–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cole, E. 2008. Coalitions as a Model for Intersectionality: From Practice to Theory. Sex Roles 59: 443–453.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9419-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, P.H. 2015. Intersectionality’s Definitional Dilemmas. The Annual Review of Sociology 41: 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Colgan, F., Hunter, C., and A. McKearney. 2014. ‘Staying Alive’: The Impact of ‘Austerity Cuts’ on the LGBT Voluntary and Community Sector (VCS) in England and Wales. London: TUC. https://www.tuc.org.uk/sites/default/files/StayingAlive.pdf. Accessed May 29, 2015.
  17. Donaghy, T.B. 2004. Applications of Mainstreaming in Australia and Northern Ireland. International Political Science Review 25 (4): 393–410.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512104045087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durbin, S., M. Page, and S. Walby. 2017. Gender Equality and ‘Austerity’: Vulnerabilities, Resistance and Change. Gender, Work & Organization 24: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ECNI [Equality Commission for Northern Ireland]. 2014. Gaps in Equality Law between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. http://www.equalityni.org/ECNI/media/ECNI/Consultation%20Responses/2014/Gaps-in-Equality-Law-in-GB-and-NI-March-2014.pdf. Accessed 5 Sept 2015.
  20. Einarsdóttir, T. 2003. Challenging the Slow Motion of Gender Equality: What can be Learned from the Icelandic Case? Presented at Gender and Power in the New Europe, the 5th European Feminist Research Conference.Google Scholar
  21. Equality and Human Rights Commission Scotland [EHRCS]. 2017. Measuring Up? Public Authorities’ performance in meeting the Scottish Specific Equality Duties, 2017. https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/publication-download/public-authorities%E2%80%99-performance-meeting-scottish-specific-equality-duties-2017. Accessed 18 Feb 2018
  22. Equality and Human Rights Commission Wales [EHRCW]. (2014). Review of the Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) in Wales: Full Report. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/publication/review-public-sector-equality-duty-psed-wales. Accessed 4 June 2015.
  23. Feast, P., and J. Hand. 2015. Enigmas of the Equality Act 2010: ‘Three Uneasy Pieces’. Cogent Social Sciences 1 (1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gedalof, I. 2013. Sameness and Difference in Government Equality Talk. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36: 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hand, J. 2015. Outside the Equality Act. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 15 (4): 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hankivsky, O. 2013. Gender Mainstreaming: A Five-Country Examination. Politics & Policy 41 (5): 629–655.  https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hankivsky, O. 2014. Intersectionality 101. Vancouver: The Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy, SFU.Google Scholar
  28. Hankivksy, O., D. Grace, G. Hunting, M. Giesbrecht, A. Fridkin, S. Rudrum, O. Ferlatte, and N. Clark. 2012. An Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis Framework. Vancouver: Institute for Intersectionality Research and Policy.Google Scholar
  29. Hankivsky, O., and A. Christoffersen. 2011. Gender mainstreaming in the United Kingdom: Current issues and future challenges. British Politics 6 (1): 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hermanin, C., and J. Squires. 2012. Institionalizing Intersectionality in the ‘Big Three’: The Changing Equality Framework in France, Germany and Britain. In Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, ed. Andrea Krizsan, Hege Skjeie, and Judith Squires, 89–118. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hubert, A., and M. Stratigaki. 2011. The European Institute for Gender Equality: A Window of Opportunity for Gender Equality Policies? European Journal of Women’s Studies 18 (2): 169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506810395436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kantola, J., and K. Nousiainen. 2009. Institutionalizing Intersectionality in Europe. International Feminist Journal of Politics 11: 459–477.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740903237426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krizsan, A., H. Skjeie, and J. Squires. 2012. Institutionalizing Intersectionality: A Theoretical Framework. In Institutionalizing Intersectionality: The Changing Nature of European Equality Regimes, ed. Andrea Krizsan, Hege Skjeie, and Judith Squires, 1–32. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, G. 2013. Unsafe Travel: Experiencing Intersectionality and Feminist Displacements. Signs 38 (4): 869–892.  https://doi.org/10.1086/669609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lombardo, E., P. Meier, and M. Verloo. 2017. Policymaking from a Gender + Equality Perspective. Journal of Women Politics & Policy 38 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Assembly for Wales. 2013. The Future of Equality and Human Rights in Wales. Accessed 9 March 2015.Google Scholar
  37. NIE [Northern Ireland Executive]. 2015. A Fresh Start: The Stormont Agreement and Implementation Plan. Belfast, UK. Signed 17 November 2015. Document. https://www.northernireland.gov.uk/publications/fresh-start-stormont-agreement-and-implementation-plan-0. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  38. Nott, S. 2000. Accentuating the Positive: Alternative Strategies for Promoting Gender Equality. In Making Women Count: Integrating Gender into Law and Policy-Making, ed. F. Beveridge, S. Nott, and K. Stephen. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Parken, A. and H. Young. 2007. Integrating the Promotion of Equality and Human Rights for All. Unpublished Report for Welsh Assembly Government and Equality and Human Rights Commission (Copy in possession of the authors).Google Scholar
  40. Payne, S. 2011. Beijing Fifteen Years On: The Persistence of Barriers to Gender Mainstreaming in Health Policy. Social Politics 18: 515–542.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxr019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Purkayastha, B. 2012. Intersectionality in a Transnational World. Gender & Society 26 (1): 55–66.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243211426725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, P., and E. Hou. 2016. The Best Education Money Can Buy? Disabled University Students and the Equality Act 2010. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 16 (2–3): 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scottish Government. 2013. Equality Outcomes and Mainstreaming Report 2013. https://beta.gov.scot/publications/equality-outcomes-mainstreaming-report/.
  44. Scottish Government. 2015. Equality Outcomes and Mainstreaming Report 2015. http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/04/7781/downloads#res476112. Accessed 3 Dec 2015.
  45. Scottish Government. 2017. Equality Outcomes and Mainstreaming Report 2017. https://beta.gov.scot/publications/equality-outcomes-mainstreaming-report-2017/. Accessed 18 Feb 2018.
  46. Solanke, I. 2011. Infusing the Silos in the Equality Act 2010 with Synergy. Industrial Law Journal 40 (4): 336–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Squires, J. 2005. Is Mainstreaming Transformative? Theorizing Mainstreaming in the Context of Diversity and Deliberation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 12 (3): 366–388.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxi020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Squires, J., and J. Kantola. 2010. The New Politics of Equality. In New Directions in Political Science: Responding to the Challenges of an Interdependent World, ed. C. Hay, 89–108. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. UN CEDAW Committee. 2013. Concluding Observations and Recommendations. United Nations.Google Scholar
  50. Vacchelli, E., P. Kathrecha, and N. Gyte. 2015. Is it Really Just the Cuts? Neo-liberal Tales from the Women’s Voluntary and Community Sector in London. Feminist Review 109: 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valentine, G. 2007. Theorizing and Researching Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist Geography. The Professional Geographer 59: 10–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00587.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Verloo, M. 2001. Another Velvet Revolution? Gender mainstreaming and the politics of implementation. IWM Working Paper No. 5: Vienna.Google Scholar
  53. Verloo, M. 2006. Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies 13 (3): 211–228.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verloo, M., and S. Walby. 2012. Introduction: The Implications for Theory and Practice of Comparing the Treatment of Intersectionality in the Equality Architecture in Europe. Social Politics 19 (4): 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verloo, M., P. Meier, S. Lauwers, and S. Martens. 2012. Putting Intersectionality into Practice in Different Configurations of Equality Architecture: Belgium and the Netherlands. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 19 (4): 513–538.  https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walby, S. 2015. Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  57. Walby, S., J. Armstrong, and S. Strid. 2012. Intersectionality: Multiple Inequalities in Social Theory. Sociology 46 (2): 224–240.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511416164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Waughray, A. 2014. Capturing Caste in Law: Caste Discrimination and the Equality Act 2010. Human Rights Law Review 14 (2): 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Welsh Government. 2015. Annual Report on Equality 2014–2015: Working for Equality in Wales. Accessed 9 Jan 2015.Google Scholar
  60. Wittman, A. 2010. Looking Local, Finding Global: Paradoxes of Gender Mainstreaming in the Scottish Executive. Review of International Studies 36: 51–76.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509990507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woodward, A.E. 2006. Mobilizing for Equality: European Transnational Equality Movements and Their Place in the Changing Landscape of European Civil Society. Paper Presented at the 15th International Conference of the Council of European Studies; April, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olena Hankivsky
    • 1
  • Diego de Merich
    • 2
  • Ashlee Christoffersen
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Public PolicySimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
  2. 2.School of Politics and International RelationsQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of Social and Political ScienceUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations