Advertisement

British Politics

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 195–214 | Cite as

Reassessing Britain’s ‘Post-war consensus’: the politics of reason 1945–1979

Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

Since the late-1970s, scholars have been engaged in a vibrant debate about the nature of post-war British politics. While some writers have suggested that the three decades that succeeded the Second World War witnessed a bi-partisan consensus on key policy questions, others have argued that it was conflict, not agreement, that marked the period. This article offers a novel contribution to this controversy by drawing attention to the epistemological beliefs of the Labour and Conservative parties. It argues that once these beliefs are considered, it becomes possible to reconcile some of the competing claims made by proponents and critics of the ‘post-war consensus’ thesis. Labour and Conservative leaders may have been wedded to different beliefs, but they also shared a common enthusiasm for empiricist reasoning and were both reluctant to identify fixed political ‘ends’ that they sought to realise. Consequently, they were both committed to evolutionary forms of change, and they eschewed the notion that any social or political arrangement was of universal value.

Keywords

Labour Conservative Ideology Post-war Britain 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Albu, A. 1952. The Organisation of Industry. In New Fabian Essays, ed. R. Crossman. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. 1968. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review. Google Scholar
  3. Ayer, A.J. 1952. Language, Truth & Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  4. Ayer, A.J. 1956. Forward From the Welfare State. Encounter: December.Google Scholar
  5. Beech, M., and K. Hickson (eds.). 2004. The Struggle for Labour’s Soul: Understanding Labour’s Political Thought Since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boothby, R., H. Macmillan, J. de Vere Loder, and O. Stanley. 1927. Industry and the State: A Conservative View. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Boyle, E. 1974a. Karl Popper’s The Open Society: A Personal Appreciation. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. P.A. Schlipp, 843–858. The Open Court: Illinois.Google Scholar
  8. Boyle, E. 1974b. ‘Notes of a speech to Oxford University Conservative Association, 31 May 1974. MS660/50300, Edward Boyle Papers (EBP), University of Leeds Special Collections.Google Scholar
  9. Boyle, E. 1974c. ‘Notes of Boyle’s Barney Spivack Memorial Lecture, 28 February. MSS660/50203, EBP, University of Leeds Special Collections.Google Scholar
  10. Boyle, E., and A. Crosland. 1971. The Politics of Education. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, R.A. 1971. The Art of the Possible. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, D. 1947. The Conservative Faith in the Modern Age. London: Conservative Political Centre.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, G.D.H. 1938. Socialism Now. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Conservative Party. 1947. The Industrial Charter: A Statement f Conservative Industrial Policy. London: Conservative and Unionist Central Office.Google Scholar
  15. Crosland, A. 1956. The Future of Socialism. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  16. Crosland, A. 2006. The Future of Socialism. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  17. Crosland, A. 1958. Society Through Statistics. Encounter, November.Google Scholar
  18. Crosland, A. 1962. The Conservative Enemy: A Programme of Radical Reform for the 1960s. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  19. Crosland, A. 1974. Socialism Now and Other Essays. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  20. Dorey, P. 2011. British Conservatism: The Politics and Philosophy of Inequality. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  21. Durbin, E. 1940. The Politics of Democratic Socialism. London: Labour Book Service.Google Scholar
  22. Durbin, E. 1942. What Have We To Defend?. London: Labour Book Service.Google Scholar
  23. Dutton, D. 1991. British Politics Since 1945. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Ellison, N. 1994. Egalitarian Thought and Labour Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fraser, D. 2000. The Postwar Consensus: A Debate Not Long Enough? Parliamentary Affairs 53 (2): 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  27. Freeden, M. 2003. Ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gamble, A. 1975. The Conservative Nation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Gaitskell, H. 1956. Socialism and Nationalisation. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  30. Gallie, W.B. 1956. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. George, V., and P. Wilding. 1994. Welfare and Ideology. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.Google Scholar
  32. Gilmour, I. 1978. Inside Right: A Study of Conservatism. London: Quartet.Google Scholar
  33. Gilmour, I. 1992. Dancing with Dogma: Britain Under Thatcherism. London: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  34. Green, E.H.H. 2002. Ideologies of Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, J. 2000. Labour’s political and social thought. In Labour’s First Century, ed. D. Tanner, P. Thane, and N. Tiratsoo. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hay, C. 1996. Re-stating Social and Political Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Heath, E. 1998. The Course of My Life. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  38. Hickson, K. 2004. The Postwar Consensus Revisited. The Political Quarterly 75 (2): 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hickson, K. 2005. Inequality. In The Political Thought of the Conservative Party since 1945, ed. K. Hickson, 178–196. Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hogg, Q. 1944. One Year’s Work. London: Hurst & Blackwell.Google Scholar
  41. Hogg, Q. 1946. Draft of The Case for Conservatism, Lord Hailsham Papers, Churchill Archives Centre, HLSM/4/1/1.Google Scholar
  42. Hogg, Q. 1947. The Case for Conservatism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Jackson, B. 2005. Equality and the British Left. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jacobs, S., and I. Tegenza. 2014. Rationalism and Tradition: The Popper-Oakeshott Conversation. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jay, D. 1960. Socialism in the New Society. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  46. Jenkins, R. 1952. Equality. In New Fabian Essays, ed. R. Crossman. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
  47. Jenkins, R. 1972. What Matters Now. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  48. Jones, H. 1996. A Bloodless Counter-Revolution: The Conservative Party and the Defence of Inequality 1945-51. In The Myth of Consensus@ New Views on British History, ed. H. Jones, and M. Kandiah, 1–16. Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kavanagh, D., and P. Morris. 1994. Consensus Politics from Attlee to Major. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Kerr, P. 2001. Postwar British Politics: From Conflict to Consensus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Lowe, R. 1996. The Replanning of the Welfare State 1957-1964. In The Conservatives and British Society, 1880–1990, ed. M. Francis, and I. Zweiniger- Bargielowka. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  52. Macmillan, H. 1938. The Middle Way. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Magee, B. 1962. The New Radicalism. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  54. Magee, B. 2010. Tony Crosland as I Knew Him. The Political Quarterly 81 (2): 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marlow, J. 1996. Questioning the Post-War Consensus Thesis. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  56. Neill, E. 2013. The Impact of Positivism: Academic Political Thought in Britain 1945–1970. History of European Ideas 39 (1): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Northam, R. 1939. Conservatism: The Only Way. London: John Gifford.Google Scholar
  58. Nuttall, J. 2005. Labour Revisionism and Qualities of Mind and Character 1931–1979. English Historical Review 120: 667–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oakeshott, M. 1948. Contemporary British Politics. Cambridge Journal 1 (8): 474–490.Google Scholar
  60. Oakeshott, M. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  61. Oakeshott, M. 1991. Rationalism and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  62. O’Hara, K. 2011. Conservatism. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
  63. Parvin, P. 2013. Karl Popper. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  64. Patten, C. 1983. The Tory Case. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  65. Pimlott, B. 1989. Is the Postwar Consensus a Myth? Contemporary Record 2 (6): 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Plant, R. 1996. Social Democracy. In The Ideas That Shaped Post-War Britain, ed. D. Marquand, and A. Seldon. London: Fonatana.Google Scholar
  67. Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and its Enemies:, vol. One. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  68. Pym, F. 1984. The Politics of Consent. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  69. Raison, T. 1964. Why Conservative? Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  70. Reisman, D. 1997. Crosland’s Future: Opportunity and Outcome. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rosenberg, S. 1989. Reason, Ideology and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Seawright, D. 2010. The British Conservative Party and One Nation Politics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  73. Shearmur, J. 1996. The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strachey, J. 1938. What Are We To Do?. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
  75. Strachey, J. 1956. Contemporary Capitalism. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
  76. Toye, R. 2012. From ‘Consensus’ to ‘Common Ground’: The Rhetoric of the Postwar Settlement and its Collapse. Journal of Contemporary History 48 (1): 2–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations