Reassessing Britain’s ‘Post-war consensus’: the politics of reason 1945–1979
Abstract
Since the late-1970s, scholars have been engaged in a vibrant debate about the nature of post-war British politics. While some writers have suggested that the three decades that succeeded the Second World War witnessed a bi-partisan consensus on key policy questions, others have argued that it was conflict, not agreement, that marked the period. This article offers a novel contribution to this controversy by drawing attention to the epistemological beliefs of the Labour and Conservative parties. It argues that once these beliefs are considered, it becomes possible to reconcile some of the competing claims made by proponents and critics of the ‘post-war consensus’ thesis. Labour and Conservative leaders may have been wedded to different beliefs, but they also shared a common enthusiasm for empiricist reasoning and were both reluctant to identify fixed political ‘ends’ that they sought to realise. Consequently, they were both committed to evolutionary forms of change, and they eschewed the notion that any social or political arrangement was of universal value.
Keywords
Labour Conservative Ideology Post-war BritainReferences
- Albu, A. 1952. The Organisation of Industry. In New Fabian Essays, ed. R. Crossman. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
- Anderson, P. 1968. Components of the National Culture. New Left Review. Google Scholar
- Ayer, A.J. 1952. Language, Truth & Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
- Ayer, A.J. 1956. Forward From the Welfare State. Encounter: December.Google Scholar
- Beech, M., and K. Hickson (eds.). 2004. The Struggle for Labour’s Soul: Understanding Labour’s Political Thought Since 1945. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boothby, R., H. Macmillan, J. de Vere Loder, and O. Stanley. 1927. Industry and the State: A Conservative View. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Boyle, E. 1974a. Karl Popper’s The Open Society: A Personal Appreciation. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. P.A. Schlipp, 843–858. The Open Court: Illinois.Google Scholar
- Boyle, E. 1974b. ‘Notes of a speech to Oxford University Conservative Association, 31 May 1974. MS660/50300, Edward Boyle Papers (EBP), University of Leeds Special Collections.Google Scholar
- Boyle, E. 1974c. ‘Notes of Boyle’s Barney Spivack Memorial Lecture, 28 February. MSS660/50203, EBP, University of Leeds Special Collections.Google Scholar
- Boyle, E., and A. Crosland. 1971. The Politics of Education. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Butler, R.A. 1971. The Art of the Possible. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Clarke, D. 1947. The Conservative Faith in the Modern Age. London: Conservative Political Centre.Google Scholar
- Cole, G.D.H. 1938. Socialism Now. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Conservative Party. 1947. The Industrial Charter: A Statement f Conservative Industrial Policy. London: Conservative and Unionist Central Office.Google Scholar
- Crosland, A. 1956. The Future of Socialism. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
- Crosland, A. 2006. The Future of Socialism. London: Constable.Google Scholar
- Crosland, A. 1958. Society Through Statistics. Encounter, November.Google Scholar
- Crosland, A. 1962. The Conservative Enemy: A Programme of Radical Reform for the 1960s. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
- Crosland, A. 1974. Socialism Now and Other Essays. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
- Dorey, P. 2011. British Conservatism: The Politics and Philosophy of Inequality. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
- Durbin, E. 1940. The Politics of Democratic Socialism. London: Labour Book Service.Google Scholar
- Durbin, E. 1942. What Have We To Defend?. London: Labour Book Service.Google Scholar
- Dutton, D. 1991. British Politics Since 1945. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Ellison, N. 1994. Egalitarian Thought and Labour Politics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fraser, D. 2000. The Postwar Consensus: A Debate Not Long Enough? Parliamentary Affairs 53 (2): 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Freeden, M. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Freeden, M. 2003. Ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gamble, A. 1975. The Conservative Nation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gaitskell, H. 1956. Socialism and Nationalisation. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
- Gallie, W.B. 1956. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- George, V., and P. Wilding. 1994. Welfare and Ideology. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.Google Scholar
- Gilmour, I. 1978. Inside Right: A Study of Conservatism. London: Quartet.Google Scholar
- Gilmour, I. 1992. Dancing with Dogma: Britain Under Thatcherism. London: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
- Green, E.H.H. 2002. Ideologies of Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris, J. 2000. Labour’s political and social thought. In Labour’s First Century, ed. D. Tanner, P. Thane, and N. Tiratsoo. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Hay, C. 1996. Re-stating Social and Political Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Heath, E. 1998. The Course of My Life. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
- Hickson, K. 2004. The Postwar Consensus Revisited. The Political Quarterly 75 (2): 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hickson, K. 2005. Inequality. In The Political Thought of the Conservative Party since 1945, ed. K. Hickson, 178–196. Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hogg, Q. 1944. One Year’s Work. London: Hurst & Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Hogg, Q. 1946. Draft of The Case for Conservatism, Lord Hailsham Papers, Churchill Archives Centre, HLSM/4/1/1.Google Scholar
- Hogg, Q. 1947. The Case for Conservatism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Jackson, B. 2005. Equality and the British Left. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
- Jacobs, S., and I. Tegenza. 2014. Rationalism and Tradition: The Popper-Oakeshott Conversation. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (1): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jay, D. 1960. Socialism in the New Society. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, R. 1952. Equality. In New Fabian Essays, ed. R. Crossman. London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, R. 1972. What Matters Now. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
- Jones, H. 1996. A Bloodless Counter-Revolution: The Conservative Party and the Defence of Inequality 1945-51. In The Myth of Consensus@ New Views on British History, ed. H. Jones, and M. Kandiah, 1–16. Palgrave: Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kavanagh, D., and P. Morris. 1994. Consensus Politics from Attlee to Major. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Kerr, P. 2001. Postwar British Politics: From Conflict to Consensus. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lowe, R. 1996. The Replanning of the Welfare State 1957-1964. In The Conservatives and British Society, 1880–1990, ed. M. Francis, and I. Zweiniger- Bargielowka. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
- Macmillan, H. 1938. The Middle Way. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Magee, B. 1962. The New Radicalism. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
- Magee, B. 2010. Tony Crosland as I Knew Him. The Political Quarterly 81 (2): 176–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marlow, J. 1996. Questioning the Post-War Consensus Thesis. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
- Neill, E. 2013. The Impact of Positivism: Academic Political Thought in Britain 1945–1970. History of European Ideas 39 (1): 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Northam, R. 1939. Conservatism: The Only Way. London: John Gifford.Google Scholar
- Nuttall, J. 2005. Labour Revisionism and Qualities of Mind and Character 1931–1979. English Historical Review 120: 667–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oakeshott, M. 1948. Contemporary British Politics. Cambridge Journal 1 (8): 474–490.Google Scholar
- Oakeshott, M. 1962. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Oakeshott, M. 1991. Rationalism and Other Essays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- O’Hara, K. 2011. Conservatism. London: Reaktion.Google Scholar
- Parvin, P. 2013. Karl Popper. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Patten, C. 1983. The Tory Case. London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Pimlott, B. 1989. Is the Postwar Consensus a Myth? Contemporary Record 2 (6): 12–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plant, R. 1996. Social Democracy. In The Ideas That Shaped Post-War Britain, ed. D. Marquand, and A. Seldon. London: Fonatana.Google Scholar
- Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and its Enemies:, vol. One. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pym, F. 1984. The Politics of Consent. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
- Raison, T. 1964. Why Conservative? Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Reisman, D. 1997. Crosland’s Future: Opportunity and Outcome. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg, S. 1989. Reason, Ideology and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Seawright, D. 2010. The British Conservative Party and One Nation Politics. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Shearmur, J. 1996. The Political Thought of Karl Popper. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Strachey, J. 1938. What Are We To Do?. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
- Strachey, J. 1956. Contemporary Capitalism. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
- Toye, R. 2012. From ‘Consensus’ to ‘Common Ground’: The Rhetoric of the Postwar Settlement and its Collapse. Journal of Contemporary History 48 (1): 2–23.Google Scholar