Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 345–367 | Cite as

Psychometrics as moral labour: Subject formation at the intersection of neoliberal and spiritual discourse

  • Susan WardellEmail author
  • Ruth Fitzgerald
Original Article

Abstract

This ethnography-based research article explores the negotiation of well-being and subjectivity for youth workers in a Faith-Based Organisation (Canterbury Youth Services [CYS]) in Christchurch, New Zealand. We highlight the emergent significance of the Clifton StrengthsFinder psychometric assessment as a biopolitical mechanism, operating to actualise vocational identities and optimise ‘life and health’ of CYS leaders, in response to burnout and other salient threats to ‘collective human vitality’. We demonstrate how StrengthsFinder contributes to the governing and responsibilisation of youth workers through a call to heightened self-reflexivity, interacting with existing faith practices. We suggest the concept of ‘moral labour’ as the most appropriate term to describe the active participation of individuals in their own subjectification through a combination of managerial and spiritual techniques. We highlight the paradoxical value of this neoliberal/managerial tool of introspection and personality auditing to the growth of spiritual identities.

Keywords

Neoliberalism Christianity Psychometrics Subjectivity Morality Non-profit work 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Cross-Cultural and Comparative Studies (CCCS) Research Theme, the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, at the University of Otago, and the University of Otago PhD Scholarship programme for generous financial support towards the fieldwork on which this article is based. We would also like to offer thanks to all of the named and unnamed participants of this study, at Canterbury Youth Services, whose openness of heart made the research not only a privilege but a pleasure.

References

  1. Asplund, J., S.J. Lopez, T. Hodges, and J. Hartner. 2009. The Clifton StrengthsFinder ® 2.0 Technical Report: Development and Validation [technical report]. Lincoln, NE: Gallup.Google Scholar
  2. Allahyari, R.A. 2000. Visions of Charity: Volunteer Workers and Moral Community. California: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Althusser, L. 1971. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, ed. L. Althusser. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  4. Banerji, A., and I. Distante. 2009. An Intimate Ethnography. Women and Performance: A Journal of Feminist Theory 19 (1): 35–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07407700802655547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barwick, H. 2006. Youth Work Today: A Review of the Issues and Challenges: A Literature Review of Youth Work in New Zealand, Australia and the United Kingdom. Barwick: Ministry of Youth Development.Google Scholar
  6. Bebbington, D.W. 2004. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730s to the 1980s. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Beer, D. 2015. Productive Measures: Culture and Measurement in the Context of Everyday Neoliberalism. Big Data and Society. SAGE and Open Access Pages. http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm.
  8. Behar, R. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology That Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bradford, S. 2007. The ‘Good Youth Leader’: Constructions of Professionalism in English Youth Work, 1939–45. Ethics and Social Welfare 1 (3): 293–309.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17496530701602832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckingham, M., and D.O. Clifton, 2001. Now, discover your strengths: How to develop your talents and those of the people you manage. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Chapman, G.D. 2009. The Five Love Languages: How to Express Heartfelt Commitment to Your Mate. Chicago: Moody Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Christopherson, R.W. 1994. Calling and Career in Christian Ministry. Review of Religious Research 35 (3): 219.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3511890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, M. 2015. The Theology of Emergency: Welfare Reform. US Foreign Aid and the Faith-Based Initiative, Theory Culture and Society 32 (2): 53–77.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, S. 2013. The Management of Faith-Based Youth Work. In Critical Issues in Youth Work Management, ed. J. Ord, 148–161. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  15. Elias, N. 1987. On Human Beings and Their Emotions: A Process Sociological Essay. Theory, Culture & Society 4: 356.Google Scholar
  16. Elisha, O. 2008. Moral Ambitions of Grace: The Paradox of Compassion and Accountability in Evangelical Faith-Based Activism. Cultural Anthropology 23 (1): 154–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellingson, L. 2009. Engaging Crystallization in Qualitative Research: An Introduction. SAGE: Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emerson, R.M., R.I. Fretz, and L.L. Shaw. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksen, T.H. 2015. Debate: ‘The Concept of Neoliberalism has Become an Obstacle to the Anthropological Understanding of the Twenty-First Century’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21: 911–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eves, R. 2010. In God’s hands’: Pentecostal Christianity, Morality, and Illness in a Melanesian Society. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (3): 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Figley, C.R. 2002. Compassion Fatigue: Psychotherapists’ Chronic Lack of Self Care. Journal of Clinical Psychology 58 (11): 1433–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fitzgerald, R. 2004. The New Zealand Health Reforms: Dividing the Labour of Care (1982). Social Science & Medicine 58 (2): 331–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. 1976. La Volonte du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault, M. 1988. Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gerth, H.H., and C.R. Mills. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Hacking, I. 2004. Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between Discourse in the Abstract and Face-to-Face Interaction. Economy and Society 33 (3): 277–302.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 2007. ‘The Process of Analysis’ in Ethnography: Principles and practice, 158–190. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heinmann, V., and T. Heinmann. 2010. Optimise Your Brain!’: Popular Science and Its Social Implications. BioSocieties 5 (2): 291–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hochschild, A. R. 1983/2003. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. University of California Press: Berkeley.Google Scholar
  31. Horvath, M. 2013. Spiritual Gifts Inventories: A Psychometric Perspective. Journal of Psychology and Christianity 32 (2): 124–133.Google Scholar
  32. Hughes, J. 2010. Emotional Intelligence: Elias, Foucault, and the Reflexive Emotional Self. Foucault Studies 8: 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hybels, B. 1991. Reading Your Gauges. http://www.christianitytoday.com/le/1991/spring/91l2032.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2015.
  34. Mantilla, M.J. 2015. Educating ‘cerebral subjects’: The emergence of brain talk in the Argentinean society. BioSocieties 10 (1): 84–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kintz, L. 2007. Finding the Strength to Surrender Marriage. Market Theocracy and the Spirit of America, Theory, Culture & Society 24 (4): 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirmayer, L.J. 2006. Beyond the ‘New Cross-Cultural Psychiatry’: Cultural Biology. Discursive Psychology and the Ironies of Globalization, Transcultural Psychiatry 43 (1): 126–144.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461506061761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kleinman, A. 2006. What Really Matters: Living a moral life amidst uncertainty and danger. N.Y.: OUP.Google Scholar
  38. Macmillan, A. 2011. Michel Foucault’s Techniques of the Self and the Christian Politics of Obedience. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (4): 3–25.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411405348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Madison, D.S. 2005. Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics and Performance. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Martin, L. 2006/. Real Work: a report from the national research project on the state of Youth Work in Aotearoa. The National Youth Workers Network. Retrieved from http://www.youthworkers.net.nz/.
  41. McCormack, F. 2011. Levels of indigeneity: the Maori and neoliberalism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17 (2): 281–300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01680.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, P., and N. Rose. 1995. Production, identity, and democracy. Theory and Society 24 (3): 427–467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neville, P. 2014. ‘It is not what you give that matters but what matters is that you give’: The One Percent Difference campaign in Ireland. Critical Social Policy 34 (3): 394–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nordberg, A. 2016. Therapeutic governmentality and biopower in a Canadian mental health court. BioSocieties 11 (2): 240–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rabinow, P., and N. Rose. 2006. Biopower Today. BioSocieties 1 (2): 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rath, T. 2008. Strengths Based Leadership: Great Leaders, Teams, and why People Follow. Washington, DC: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies. Los Angeles, Sage: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials.Google Scholar
  48. Rose, N. 1996. Governing ‘Advanced’ Liberal Democracies. In Foucault and Political Reason, ed. A. Barry, T. Osborne, and N. Rose. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ryan, K., P. Bissell, and J. Alexander. 2010. Moral Work in Women’s Narratives of Breastfeeding. Social Science and Medicine 70 (6): 951–958.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schilling, R., and S.T. Casper. 2015. Of Psychometric Means: Starke R. Hathaway and the Popularization of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Science in Context 28 (10): 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thelen, T. 2015. Care as Social Organization: Creating, Maintaining and Dissolving Significant Relations. Anthropological Theory. http://ant.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/1463499615600893. Accessed 19 Oct 2015.
  52. Thomas, O.C. 2000. Interiority and Christian Spirituality. The Journal of Religion 80 (1): 41–60.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1205655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wardell, S. 2016. Living in the Tension: A Cross-Cultural Comparative Study of the Meaning and Management of Wellbeing among two communities of Faith-Based Youth Workers. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin.Google Scholar
  54. Weber, M. .1905/2001. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  55. Wiegratz, J. 2010. Fake Capitalism? The Dynamics of Neoliberal Moral Restructuring and Pseudo-Development: The Case of Uganda. Review of African Political Economy 37 (124): 123–137.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2010.484525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winseman, A.L., D.O. Clifton, and C. Liesveld. 2004. Living Your Strengths: Discover Your God-given Talents, and Inspire Your Community. Washington, DC: Gallup Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vrecko, S. 2006. Folk Neurology and the Remaking of Identity. Molecular Interventions 6 (6): 300–303.  https://doi.org/10.1124/mi.6.6.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Anthropology Programme, Department of Anthropology & ArchaeologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations