Advertisement

Performance feedback and firms’ R&D frequency: a comparison between state-owned and private-owned enterprises in China

  • Xin Chen
  • En XieEmail author
  • Marc Van Essen
Original Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

R&D investments are an important precursor to innovation and ultimately affect a firm’s long-term performance. Prior research has treated R&D expenses as static over time, but over the last few years, scholars have switched to a more dynamic perspective of R&D investment. Using data from Chinese listed manufacturing firms, this study investigates the influence of performance feedback on R&D investment frequency, and further explores how that influence differs in SOEs and POEs. These results provide insight into the dynamics of firms’ R&D investment, which can help decision-makers properly stimulate firms’ R&D investments in China’s emerging economy.

Keywords

R&D investments Frequency Performance feedback Social aspiration Historical aspiration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Associate Editor Professor Dylan Sutherland and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and guidance. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71572143).

References

  1. Audia, P. G., & Greve, H. R. (2006). Less likely to fail: Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry. Management Science,52(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, J. A. C., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., & Chuang, Y.-T. (2005). Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners. Administrative Science Quarterly,50(4), 536–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal,34(1), 205–214.Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, R. P., & Zajac, E. J. (1994). Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly,39(2), 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boeing, P., Mueller, E., & Sander, P. (2016). China’s R&D explosion: Analyzing productivity effects across ownership types and over time. Research Policy,45(1), 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brockhoff, K. K., & Pearson, A. W. (1998). R&D budgeting reactions to a recession. Management International Review,38(4), 363–376.Google Scholar
  7. Bromiley, P. (1991). Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal,31(4), 37–59.Google Scholar
  8. Bromiley, P., & Harris, J. D. (2014). A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management Journal,35(3), 338–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, M. A., Pollock, T. G., & Leary, M. M. (2003). Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking: Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal,24(9), 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, W.-R. (2008). Determinants of firms’ backward-and forward-looking R&D search behavior. Organization Science,19(4), 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, W.-R., & Miller, K. D. (2007). Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal,28(4), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, X.-H., Peng, Z.-S., & Han, W.-Q. (2008). Research on the relationship between SMEs tech-innovation and growth evidence from the listed SMEs in China. Studies in Science of Science,26(5), 1098–1104.Google Scholar
  13. Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal,55(4), 976–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, W. M., Levin, R. C., & Mowery, D. C. (1987). Firm size and R&D intensity: A re-examination. Journal of Industrial Economics,35(4), 543–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Un, C. A. (2010). Why some firms never invest in formal R&D. Strategic Management Journal,31(7), 759–779.Google Scholar
  17. Cull, R., & Xu, L.-C. (2005). Institutions, ownership, and finance: The determinants of profit reinvestment among Chinese firms. Journal of Financial Economics,77(1), 117–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. David, P., Hitt, M. A., & Gimeno, J. (2001). The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal,44(1), 144–157.Google Scholar
  20. Ding, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhang, J.-X. (2007). Private vs. state ownership and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Corporate Governance,15(2), 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eichengreen, F., Park, D., & Shin, K. (2012). When fast-growing economies slow down: International evidence and implications for China. Asian Economic Paper,11(1), 42–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiegenbaum, A., & Thomas, H. (2010). Strategic groups as reference groups: Theory, modeling and empirical examination of industry and competitive strategy. Strategic Management Journal,16(6), 461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technology search. Strategic Management Journal,25(8–9), 909–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortune China. (2013, July 16). China top 500 listed firms in 2013. Retrieved from http://www.fortunechina.com/fortune500/c/2013-07/16/content_165379.htm
  25. Galende, J., & de la Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behavior. Research Policy,32(5), 715–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gentry, R. J., & Shen, W. (2013). The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Strategic Management Journal,34(1), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldeng, E., Grünfeld, L., & Benito, G. (2008). The performance differential between private and state owned enterprises: The roles of ownership, management and market structure. Journal of Management Studies,45(7), 1244–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greve, H. R. (1996). Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly,41(1), 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly,43(1), 58–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greve, H. R. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence form shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal,46(6), 685–702.Google Scholar
  31. Guan, J. C., & Yam, R. C. M. (2015). Effects of government financial incentives on firms’ innovation performance in China: Evidences from Beijing in the 1990s. Research Policy,44(1), 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hagedoorn, J., & Cloodt, M. (2003). Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? Research Policy,32(8), 1365–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hambrick, D. C., & MacMillan, I. C. (1985). Efficiency of product R&D in business units: The role of strategic context. Academy of Management Journal,28(3), 527–547.Google Scholar
  34. Harhoff, D. (1998). R&D and productivity in German manufacturing firms. Economics of Innovation & New Technology,6(1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, J., & Bromiley, P. (2007). Incentives to cheat: The influence of executive compensation and firm performance on financial misrepresentation. Organization Science,18(3), 350–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Helfat, C. E. (2000). Guest editor’s introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities. Strategic Management Journal,21(10–11), 955–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howell, A. (2016). Firm R&D, innovation and easing financial constraints in China: Does corporate tax reform matter? Research Policy,45(10), 1996–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu, S., He, Z., Blettner, D. P., & Bettis, R. A. (2017). Conflict inside and outside: Social comparisons and attention shifts in multidivisional firms. Strategic Management Journal,38(7), 1435–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang, C., Arundel, A., & Hollanders, H. (2010). How firms innovate: R&D, non-R&D, and technology adoption. MERIT Working Papers 027, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).Google Scholar
  40. Huergo, E., & Jaumandreu, J. (2004). Firm’s age, process innovation and productivity growth. International Journal of Industrial Organization,22(4), 541–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iyer, D. N., & Miller, K. D. (2008). Performance feedback, slack, and the timing of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal,51(4), 808–822.Google Scholar
  42. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1978). Can the corporation survive? Financial Analysts Journal,34(1), 31–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jordan, A. H., & Audia, P. G. (2012). Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Academy of Management Review,37(2), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kacperczyk, A., Beckman, C. M., & Moliterno, T. P. (2014). Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry. Administrative Science Quarterly,60(2), 228–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kahneman, D., & Lovallo, D. (1993). Timid choices and bold forecasts: A cognitive perspective on risk-taking. Management Science,39(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal,45(6), 1183–1194.Google Scholar
  47. Kim, J.-J. Y., Finkelstein, S., & Haleblian, J. (2015). All aspirations are not created equal: The differential effects of historical and social aspirations on acquisition behavior. Academy of Management Journal,58(5), 1361–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kor, Y. Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal,27(11), 1081–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kor, Y. Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal,34(2), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silane, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance,54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lamin, A., & Ramos, M. A. (2016). R&D investment dynamics in agglomerations under weak appropriability regimes: Evidence from Indian R&D labs. Strategic Management Journal,37(3), 604–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Latham, S., & Braun, M. (2010). Does short-termism influence firm innovation? An examination of S&P 500 firms, 1990–2003. Journal of Managerial Issues,22(3), 368–382.Google Scholar
  53. Levinthal, D., & March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2(4), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology,14, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Li, J.-T., & Tang, Y. (2010). CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Academy of Management Journal,53(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lim, E. N. K., & McCann, B. T. (2014). Performance feedback and firm risk taking: The moderating effects of CEOs and outside director stock options. Organization Science,25(1), 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lucas, G. J. M., Knoben, J., & Meeus, M. T. H. (2018). Contradictory yet coherent? Inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change. Journal of Management,44(2), 658–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. March, J. C., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Science,33(11), 1404–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. March, J. C., & Shapira, Z. (1992). Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention. Psychological Review,99(1), 172–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McGrath, R. G. (1997). A real options logic for initiating technology positioning investments. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 974–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Menon, T., & Pfeffer, J. (2003). Valuing internal vs. external knowledge: Explaining the preference for outsiders. Management Science,49(4), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ministry of Finance of the People’s Republic of China. (2013). The report of national science and technology investments 2013. Retrieved from http://www.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/caizhengshuju/201309/t20130926_993359.html
  63. Moliterno, T. P., Beck, N., Beckman, C. M., & Meyer, M. (2014). Knowing your place: Social performance feedback in good times and bad times. Organization Science,25(6), 1684–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2014). Knowing when to leap: Transitioning between exploitative and explorative R&D. Strategic Management Journal,35(1), 126–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ning, L., Sutherland, D., & Fu, X.-L. (2017). Local context and innovation in China. Asian Business & Management,16(3), 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Okhmatovskiy, I. (2010). Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management Studies,47(6), 1020–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Park, K. M. (2007). Antecedents of convergence and divergence in strategic positioning: The effects of performance and aspiration on the direction of strategic change. Organization Science,18(3), 386–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Peng, M. W. (2004). Outside directors and firm performance during institutional transitions. Strategic Management Journal,25(5), 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review,21(2), 492–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Peng, M. W., Li, Y., Xie, E., & Su, Z. (2010). CEO duality, organizational slack, and firm performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,27(4), 611–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D., & Caringal, C. (2006). Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Academy of Management Review,31(1), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rialp-Criado, A., & Komochkova, K. (2017). Innovation strategy and export intensity of Chinese SMEs: The moderating role of the home-country business environment. Asian Business & Management,16(3), 158–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shapiro, D., Tang, Y., Wang, M.-J., & Zhang, W.-Y. (2017). Monetary incentives and innovation in Chinese SMEs. Asian Business & Management,16(3), 130–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shipilov, A. V., Li, S., & Greve, H. R. (2011). The prince and the pauper: Search and brokerage in the initiation of status-heterophilous ties. Organization Science,22(6), 1418–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly,26(4), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stiglitz, J. (1998). Distinguished lecture on economics in government: The private uses of public interests: Incentives and institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives,12(2), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy,15(6), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vissa, B., Greve, H. R., & Chen, W.-R. (2010). Business group affiliation and firm search behavior in India: Responsiveness and focus of attention. Organization Science,21(3), 696–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review,15(3), 421–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, D., Sutherland, D., Ning, L., Wang, Y., & Pan, X. (2018). Exploring the influence of political connections and managerial overconfidence on R&D intensity in China’s large-scale private sector firms. Technovation,69, 40–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Williams, R. (2019). Adjusted predictions & marginal effects for multiple outcome models & commands (including ologit, mlogit, oglm, & gologit2). Retrieved from https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/xsoc73994/Margins05. pdf.
  83. World Bank, & Development Research Center. (2013). China 2030 building a modern, harmonious, and creative society. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Xia, J., Ma, X.-F., Lu, J.-W., & Yiu, D.-W. (2014). Outward foreign direct investment by emerging market firms: A resource dependence logic. Strategic Management Journal,35(9), 1343–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Xia, F., & Walker, G. (2015). How much does owner type matter for firm performance? Manufacturing firms in China 1998–2007. Strategic Management Journal,36(4), 576–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Xie, C.-Y. (2008). How do ownership and debt affect R&D investments in Privatized firms? Evidence from the emerging economy of China (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  87. Xinhua. (2015, March 11). China issues opinions to encourage mass entrepreneurship, innovation. Retrieved from http://en.people.cn/n/2015/0311/c90785-8861559.html.
  88. Xu, E., & Zhang, H. (2008). The impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management,25(3), 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Yoo, T., & Rhee, M. (2013). Agency theory and the context for R&D investment: Evidence from Korea. Asian Business & Management,12(2), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang, Y., & Qu, H. (2016). The impact of COE succession with gender change on firm performance and successor early departure: Evidence from China’s publicly listed companies in 1997–2010. Academy of Management Journal,59(5), 1845–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhou, K., Gao, G., & Zhao, H. (2017). State ownership and firm innovation in China: An integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly,62(2), 375–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zou, H., & Adams, M. B. (2008). Corporate ownership, equity risk and returns in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of International Business Studies,39(7), 1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The School of ManagementXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.The School of Economics and ManagementTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Darla Moore School of BusinessUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations