Advertisement

Context, competencies, and local managerial capacity development: a longitudinal study of HRM implementation at Volvo Car China

  • Ramsin YakobEmail author
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates and analyzes qualitatively the effects of HRM implementation on managerial capacity development. Empirically, the study draws on a 4-year longitudinal in-depth qualitative case study of Volvo Car Corporation’s establishment in the Chinese market through its subsidiary Volvo Car China. The findings show that HRM at the case organization followed an implementation trajectory of establishing and building, deploying and broadening, reconfiguring and augmenting, and integrating and deepening. Managerial capacity development by means of ambience, permeability, accretion, and pertinence of competencies and the role of the local capacity context and its influence on local managerial capacity development is discussed.

Keywords

Human resources Managerial capacity Capacity context Management development MNC China 

Notes

References

  1. Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 1011–1025.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlvik, C., & Björkman, I. (2015). Towards explaining subsidiary implementation, integration, and internalization of MNC headquarters HRM practices. International Business Review, 24(3), 497–505.Google Scholar
  3. Alvstam, C. G., & Ivarsson, I. (2014). The ‘Hybrid’ emerging market multinational enterprise—The ownership transfer of Volvo cars to China, Asian Inward and Outward FDI. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Björkman, I., & Xiucheng, F. (2002). Human resource management and the performance of Western firms in China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(6), 853–864.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, S.-Y., Uen, J. F., & Chen, C.-C. (2016). Implementing high performance HR practices in Asia: HR practice consistency, employee roles, and performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(4), 937–958.Google Scholar
  6. Collings, D. G., Morley, M. J., & Gunnigle, P. (2008). Composing the top management team in the international subsidiary: Qualitative evidence on international staffing in US MNCs in the Republic of Ireland. Journal of world business, 43(2), 197–212.Google Scholar
  7. Collings, D. G., Scullion, H., & Dowling, P. J. (2009). Global staffing: A review and thematic research agenda. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(6), 1253–1272.Google Scholar
  8. Cooke, F. L., Wood, G., Wang, M., & Veen, A. (2019). How far has international HRM travelled? A systematic review of literature on multinational corporations (2000–2014). Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
  9. Delios, A., & Bjorkman, I. (2000). Expatriate staffing in foreign subsidiaries of Japanese multinational corporations in the PRC and the United States. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(2), 278–293.Google Scholar
  10. Dutta, D. K., & Beamish, P. W. (2013). Expatriate managers, product relatedness, and IJV performance: A resource and knowledge-based perspective. Journal of International Management, 19(2), 152–162.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
  12. Fenwick, T. (2010). Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 1(2), 104–116.Google Scholar
  13. Gamble, J. (2011). Transferring organizational practices and the dynamics of hybridization: Japanese retail multinationals in China. Multinational retailers and consumers in China (pp. 107–140). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Gioia, D. A., Price, K. N., Hamilton, A. L., & Thomas, J. B. (2010). Forging an identity: An insider-outsider study of processes involved in the formation of organizational identity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 1–46.Google Scholar
  15. Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. (2007). The Penrose effect: “Excess” expatriates in multinational enterprises. Management International Review, 47(2), 221–239.Google Scholar
  16. Hartmann, E., Feisel, E., & Schober, H. (2010). Talent management of western MNCs in China: Balancing global integration and local responsiveness. Journal of world business, 45(2), 169–178.Google Scholar
  17. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767–798.Google Scholar
  18. Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (2013). Managerial services and complexity in a firm’s expansion process: An empirical study of the impact on the growth of the firm. European Management Journal, 31(2), 137–151.Google Scholar
  19. Hutzschenreuter, T., Voll, J. C., & Verbeke, A. (2011). The impact of added cultural distance and cultural diversity on international expansion patterns: A Penrosean perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2), 305–329.Google Scholar
  20. Ivarsson, I., & Alvstam, C. G. (2005). Technology transfer from TNCs to local suppliers in developing countries: A study of AB Volvo’s truck and bus plants in Brazil, China, India, and Mexico. World Development, 33(8), 1325–1344.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, R., & Szulanski, G. (2004). Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(6), 508–523.Google Scholar
  22. Jiang, R. J., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. (2014). Time compression diseconomies in foreign expansion. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 114–121.Google Scholar
  23. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.Google Scholar
  24. Johnston, S., & Menguc, B. (2007). Subsidiary size and the level of subsidiary autonomy in multinational corporations: A quadratic model investigation of Australian subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 787–801.Google Scholar
  25. Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Michael, S. C. (2007). Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1187–1212.Google Scholar
  26. Kor, Y. Y., & Mesko, A. (2013). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Configuration and orchestration of top executives’ capabilities and the firm’s dominant logic. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 233–244.Google Scholar
  27. Langley, A., & Abdallah, C. (2011). Templates and turns in qualitative studies of strategy and management. In D. J. Ketchen Jr. & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Building methodological bridges. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Le Deist, F. (2009). Compétence: Conceptual approach and practice in France. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 718–735.Google Scholar
  29. Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248–266.Google Scholar
  30. Li, P. P. (2010). Toward a learning-based view of internationalization: The accelerated trajectories of cross-border learning for latecomers. Journal of International Management, 16(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, Y., & Woywode, M. (2013). Light-touch integration of Chinese cross-border MandA: The influences of culture and absorptive capacity. Thunderbird International Business Review, 55(4), 469–483.Google Scholar
  32. Mäkelä, K., Björkman, I., & Ehrnrooth, M. (2009). MNC subsidiary staffing architecture: Building human and social capital within the organisation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(6), 1273–1290.Google Scholar
  33. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Minbaeva, D., Pedersen, T., Bjorkman, I., Fey, C. F., & Park, H. J. (2003). MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6), 586–599.Google Scholar
  35. Mishina, Y., Pollock, T. G., & Porac, J. F. (2004). Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion. Strategic Management Journal, 25(12), 1179–1197.Google Scholar
  36. Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Leveraging knowledge and competencies across space: The next frontier in international business. Journal of International Management, 17(3), 186–189.Google Scholar
  37. Narula, R., & Dunning, J. H. (2000). Industrial development, globalization and multinational enterprises: New realities for developing countries. Oxford Development Studies, 28(2), 141–167.Google Scholar
  38. Peng, G. Z., & Beamish, P. W. (2014). MNC subsidiary size and expatriate control: Resource-dependence and learning perspectives. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 51–62.Google Scholar
  39. Phene, A., & Almeida, P. (2008). Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 901–919.Google Scholar
  40. Piao, X. & Moon, J., Journal of Asian Business and Management (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-018-0048-4
  41. Riaz, S., Rowe, W. G., & Beamish, P. W. (2014). Expatriate-deployment levels and subsidiary growth: A temporal analysis. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  42. Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2009). Contingencies within dynamic managerial capabilities: Interdependent effects of resource investment and deployment on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30(13), 1375–1394.Google Scholar
  43. Smale, A., Björkman, I., & Sumelius, J. (2013). Examining the differential use of global integration mechanisms across HRM practices: Evidence from China. Journal of World Business, 48(2), 232–240.Google Scholar
  44. Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Examining the Penrose effect in an international business context: The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26(2), 113–127.Google Scholar
  45. Tan, D., & Mahoney, J. (2007). The dynamics of Japanese firm growth in US industries: The Penrose effect. Management International Review, 47(2), 259–279.Google Scholar
  46. Tseng, J.-J., & Chien, C.-C. (2010). Managerial constraints, absorptive capabilities and firm growth: A re-examination of the “Penrose effect”. NTU Management Review, 20(2), 217–251.Google Scholar
  47. Welch, C., Piekkari, R., Plakoyiannaki, E., & Paavilainen-Mäntymäki, E. (2011). Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(5), 740–762.Google Scholar
  48. Winterton, J. (2009). Competence across Europe: Highest common factor or lowest common denominator? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 681–700.Google Scholar
  49. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721.Google Scholar
  50. Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Hoskisson, R. E., Peng, M. W. (2005). Strategy research in emerging economies: Challenging the conventional wisdom. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  51. Xie, Y., & Cooke, F.L. (2018). Quality and cost? The evolution of Walmart’s business strategy and human resource policies and practices in China and their impact (1996–2017). Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
  52. Xu, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2013). Linking theory and context: ‘Strategy Research in Emerging Economies’ after Wright et al. (2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1322–1346.Google Scholar
  53. Yakob, R. (2018). Augmenting local managerial capacity through knowledge collectivities: The case of Volvo Car China. Journal of International Management.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2018.02.002.Google Scholar
  54. Yakob, R., Nakamura, H. R., & Ström, P. (2018). Chinese foreign acquisitions aimed for strategic asset-creation and innovation upgrading: The case of Geely and Volvo Cars. Technovation, 70, 59–72.Google Scholar
  55. Yao, Z., Yang, Z., Fisher, G. J., Ma, C., & Fang, E. E. (2013). Knowledge complementarity, knowledge absorption effectiveness, and new product performance: The exploration of international joint ventures in China. International Business Review, 22(1), 216–227.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business Economics & LawUniversity of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations