Grow small, think big: designing a local food system for London, Ontario

  • Kassie Miedema
Original Article


This article provides a case study and a proposal for a neighbourhood strategy to strengthen the local food system. The proposal is a manual for a transferable strategy on how to establish a decentralized network of food production, not to replace industrial agriculture but to address its weaknesses. This paper explores how establishing a local food system can encourage people to think big by growing on a small scale, and how urban agriculture can have positive environmental, social, and economic effects. The Hamilton Road Neighbourhood in London, Ontario is the particular case study site this paper explores and analyzes for its appropriateness and receptiveness to urban agriculture. The paper uses lessons adapted from Rob Hopkin’s Transition Town strategy to develop a specific illustration of what a cohesive infrastructure for a local food system could look like in the context of Hamilton Road as well as a manual for a transferable strategy for establishing a network of urban agriculture anywhere.


Urban Agriculture Local Food System 



  1. Allen, W., and C. Wilson. 2012. The Good Food Revolution: Growing Healthy Food, People, and Communities. New York: Gotham.Google Scholar
  2. Beckie, M., and E. Bogdan. 2010. Planting Roots: Urban Agriculture for Senior Immigrants. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1 (2): 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry, Wendell. 1990. “The Pleasures of Eating.” What Are People for?: Essays. Berkeley: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  4. Crouch Neighbourhood Resource Centre. Accessed 30 July 2017.
  5. Demographic Statistics. (2011) Planning Division: Policy Planning & Programs, City of London,
  6. Food Prosperity Programs: Good Food Box, Soul Food Collective, Crouch Neighbourhood Resource Centre. Accessed 2 April 2019.
  7. Gladwell, M. 2000. Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Hopkins, R. 2008. The Transition Handbook: From Oil Dependency to Local Resilience. Dartington: Green Books Foxhole.Google Scholar
  9. Illich, I. 1973. Tools for Conviviality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Italian Seniors’ Project. Accessed 30 July 2017.
  11. Kingsolver, B., et al. 2007. Animal, Vegetable, Miracle: A Year of Food Life. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  12. Lane, R. 2005. Standing “Aloof” from the State: Thoreau on Self-Government. The Review of Politics 67 (2): 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. London Food Coalition. Accessed 2 April 2019.
  14. Middlesex London Food Policy Council. Accessed 2 April 2019.
  15. Pollan, M. 2013. Cooked: A natural history of transformation. New York: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rossi, A. 1982. The Architecture of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Soderholm, D. 2015. Planning for Urban Agriculture in Canadian Cities. Waterloo: University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  18. Steel, C. 2008. Hungry City: How Food Shapes Our Lives. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  19. The Carolinian Food Forest., accessed 30 July 2017.
  20. Tudge, C. 2003. So Shall We Reap: What’s Gone Wrong with the World’s Food and How to Fix It. London: Penguin Adult.Google Scholar
  21. Urban Agriculture Strategy. Planning Division: Urban Agriculture Steering Committee, City of London,
  22. Whitefield, P. 2002. How to Make a Forest Garden. Hampshire: Permanent Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kassie Miedema
    • 1
  1. 1.TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations