Advertisement

The Role of Personal Identity in Human Development

  • Ilaria Schnyder von Wartensee
  • Elizabeth Hlabse
  • Gabriella Berloffa
  • Giuseppe Folloni
Original Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

Contributing to the capability and human development literature, this article suggests that personal identity—defined as a person’s recognition of her value—is the crucial element for local actors’ agency. We report the results of a qualitative study in Kampala, Uganda, which examines the experience of a grassroots development organisation in promoting health and wellbeing among vulnerable people. Findings show that personal identity has served to catalyse local actors’ agency, becoming the basis for a constructive and lasting transformation of the study group’s socioeconomic circumstances. In light of these findings, we discuss the potential for the experience to be translated across other development contexts.

Keywords

Agency Capability approach Human development Personal identity Uganda 

Résumé

En contribuant à la réflexion sur les capacités et le développement humains, cet article suggère comment l’identité personnelle – pouvant être définie comme la reconnaissance par une personne de sa propre valeur – est l’élément crucial dans l’action des acteurs locaux. Nous présentons les résultats d’une recherche qualitative, réalisée à Kampala (Ouganda), qui examine l’expérience d’une organisation locale d’aide au développement, active dans la promotion de la santé et du bien-être de personnes vulnérables. Les résultats montrent que l’identité personnelle a servi de catalyseur à la capacité des acteurs locaux, devenant la base d’une transformation constructive et durable de la situation socio-économique du groupe étudié. Au vu de ces résultats, nous discutons de la possibilité de transposer l’expérience dans d’autres contextes de développement.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the constructive feedback of Ted Beatty, Simona Beretta, Paolo Carozza, Séverine Deneulin, Robert Dowd, Georges Enderle, and Clemens Sedmak, and thank Rose Busingye and the MPI and LGHS communities for permission to conduct this study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alkire, S. 2002. Dimensions of Human Development. World Development 30 (2): 185–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkire, S. 2005. Subjective Quantitative Studies of Human Agency. Social Indicators Research 74 (1): 217–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6525-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alkire, S. 2008. Concepts and Measures of Agency. In Arguments for a Better World: Essays in Honor of Amartya Sen, vol. 1, ed. K. Basu and R. Kanbur, 455–474. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anheier, H.K., M. Kaldor, and M. Glasius (eds.). 2005. Global Civil Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Aryenyo, V. 2008. Is Saying “Yes” to the Mystery. Presentation at the Meeting for Friendship among People; August, Rimini, Italy. Retrieved from: http://archivio.traces-cl.com/2008E/09/issayingyes.html
  6. Ballet, J., J.L. Dubois, and F.R. Mahieu. 2007. Responsibility for each other’s freedom: agency as the source of collective capability. Journal of Human Development 8 (2): 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballet, J., and F.R. Mahieu. 2009. Capabilité et capacité dans le développement: repenser la question du sujet dans l’œuvre d’Amartya Sen. [Capability and capacity in development: Rethinking the question of the subject in the work of Amartya Sen]. Revue Tiers Monde 2: 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumeister, R.F. 1998. The Self. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, ed. D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 680–740. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Baumeister, R.F., and M.R. Leary. 1995. The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117 (3): 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berloffa, G., G. Folloni, and I. Schnyder von Wartensee. 2012. At the Root of Development: the Importance of the Human Factor. Milano: Fondazione per la Sussidiarietà.Google Scholar
  11. Berloffa, G., and I. Schnyder von Wartensee. 2010. Dinámicas de cambio y los factores que las han favorecido: el caso del proyecto socio educativo ‘Educaciòn para todos’ Quito—Ecuador. [Changing dynamics and the factors that fostered those changes: the social education project ‘Education for all’ Quito—Ecuador]. Investigaciones evaluativas sobre el programa AEDI, Quito, Informe de investigaciòn. Quito, Ecuador: Association of Volunteers in International Service (AVSI).Google Scholar
  12. Borghans, L., A.L. Duckworth, J.J. Heckman, and B. Ter Weel. 2008. The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits. Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 972–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowlby, J. 1969. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Bowlby, J. 1973. Attachment and Loss: Vol. 2. Separation Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Boyatzis, R. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  16. Bruni, L., and F. Comim. 2008. Capabilities and Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brunie, A. 2009. Meaningful Distinctions Within a Concept. Relational, Collective and Generalized Social Capital. Social Science Research 38: 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Busingye, R. 2012. Communion in Suffering and Healing. Personal Testimony at the 50th International Eucharistic Congress; June, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  19. Carlson, K., and D. Mazurana. 2006. Beating Wives and Protecting Culture: Violent Responses to Women’s Awakening to Their Rights. Humanitarian Practice Network 36: 14–16.Google Scholar
  20. Coleman, J.S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Conradie, I., and I. Robeyns. 2013. Aspirations and Human Development Interventions. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14 (4): 559–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davis, J.B. 2004. Identity and Commitment, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 055/2.Google Scholar
  23. Deci, E.L., and R.M. Ryan. 1991. A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R.A. Dienstbier (Ed.), Current theory and research in motivation, Vol. 38. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1990: Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  24. Deneulin, S., and J.A. McGregor. 2010. The Capability Approach and the Politics of a Social Conception of Wellbeing. European Journal of Social Theory 13 (4): 501–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deneulin, S., and L. Shahani. 2009. An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  26. Drèze, J., and A.K. Sen. 2002. India: Development and Participation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eade, D. 2007. Capacity Building: Who Builds Whose Capacity? Development in Practice 17 (4/5): 630–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eyben, R. 2006. Relationships for Aid. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  29. Farmer, P. 2011. Partners in Help: Assisting the Poor Over the Long Term. Foreign Affairs.Google Scholar
  30. Heckman, J.J., and T. Kautz. 2013. Fostering and Measuring Skills: Interventions that Improve Character and Cognition (No. w19656). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Honneth, A. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ibrahim, S., and S. Alkire. 2007. Agency and Empowerment: A proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators. Oxford Development Studies 35 (4): 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klein, E. 2014. Psychological Agency: Evidence from the Urban Fringe of Bamako. World Development 64: 642–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mæland, B. 2010. Culture, Religion, and the Reintegration of Female Child Soldiers in Northern Uganda. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  35. McNeill, D. 2007. Human Development: The Power of the Idea. Journal of Human Development 8 (1): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Narayan, D., R. Patel, K. Schafft, A. Rademacher, and S. Koch-Schulte. 2000. Voices of the Poor. Can Anyone Hear Us?. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nebel, M. 2014. Servir les pauvres. Oui, mais dites-moi: quels pauvres au juste? [To serve the poor. Yes, but which poor do you mean?] Revue d’éthique et de théologie morale 2, pp. 31–56.  https://doi.org/10.3917/retm.279.0031.
  38. Nebel, M., and R.T. Herrera. 2006. A Hermeneutic of Amartya Sen’s Concept of Capability. International Journal of Social Economics 33 (10): 710–722.  https://doi.org/10.1108/030682906106689741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nebel, M., and R.T. Herrera. 2017. Midiendo la meta-capabilidad de agencia: base teórica para la creación de un indicador de responsabilidad. Revue Éthique et Économique/Ethics and Economics 14 (2): 1–24.Google Scholar
  40. Paterson, J.G., and L.T. Zderad. 1976. Humanistic Nursing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  41. Ponzio, R., and A. Gosh. 2016. Human Development and Global Institutions: Evolution, Impact, Reform. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Pugno, M. 2008. Capabilities, the Self, and Well-Being. In Capabilities & Happiness, ed. L. Bruni, F. Comim, and M. Pugno, 224–253. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Quarles van Ufford, P.H., and A.K. Giri. 2003. Reconstituting Development as a Shared Responsibility. In A Moral Critique of Development: In Search of Global Responsibilities, ed. P.H. Quarles van Ufford and A.K. Giri, 253–278. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Rao Gupta, G., J. Parkhurst, J. Odgen, P. Aggleton, and A. Mahal. 2008. Structural Approaches to HIV Prevention. The Lancet 372: 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rappaport, R.A. 1999. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Samman, E., and M.E. Santos. 2009. Agency and Empowerment: A Review of Concepts, Indicators and Empirical Evidence. Draft Prepared for the 2009 Human Development Report in Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
  49. Sen, A. 1979. Equality of What? Tanner Lecture on Human Values Delivered on May 22 at Stanford University.Google Scholar
  50. Sen, A.K. 1985. Well-Being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221.Google Scholar
  51. Sen, A.K. 1990. Development as Capability Expansion. In Human Development and the International Development Strategy for the 1990s, ed. K. Griffin and J. Knight, 41–58. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sen, A.K. 1992. Inequality Re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sen, A.K. 1999a. Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  54. Sen, A.K. 1999b. Reason Before Identity. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sen, A.K. 2003. Foreword. In Readings in Human Development: Concepts, Measures and Policies for a Development Paradigm, eds. S. Fukuda-Parr and A.K. Shiva Kumar, vii-viii. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Shaikh, N. 2004. “Interview with Amartya Sen” Asia Source Q&A Interview. http://asiasociety.org/amartya-sen-morehuman-theory-development. Accessed 3 March 2014.
  57. Taylor, C. 1991. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Taylor, C. 1997. The Politics of Recognition. In New Context of Canadian Criticism, eds. A. Heble, D. Palmateer Pennee, and J.R. Struthers. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
  59. Teschl, M., and L. Derobert. 2008. Does Identity Matter? On the Relevance of Identity and Interaction for Capabilities. In The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications, ed. F. Comim, M. Qizilbash, and S. Alkire, 125–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thomas-Slayter, B.P., and W.F. Fisher. 2011. Social Capital and AIDS-Resilient Communities: Strengthening the AIDS Response. Global Public Health 6 (3): 323–343.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2011.617380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ul Haq, M. 1995. Reflections on Human Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. UNDP. 1990. Human Development Report 1990: Concept and Measurement of Human Development Technical Report. New York: UNDP.Google Scholar
  63. Woolcock, M. 2001. The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2 (1): 11–17.Google Scholar
  64. Woolcock, M. and E. Radin. 2008. A Relational Approach to the Theory and Practices of Economic Development. In Handbook of Social Capital, eds. D. Castiglione, J. van Deth and G. Wolleb, 411-438. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kellogg Institute for International StudiesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations