Advertisement

Subjectivity

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Affect, practice and contingency: critical discursive psychology and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick

  • Maree MartinussenEmail author
  • Margaret Wetherell
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

This article intersperses Sedgwick’s analysis of paranoid theory and critical discursive psychology, focusing in particular on tools for researching affect and emotion. It is suggested that there are some surprising convergences between Sedgwick’s conclusions about reparative ways of analysing and the emphases in critical discursive psychology. Both stress contingency and craft, the uncertain trajectories of discourses, and what Sedgwick describes as ‘the middle ranges of agency’. Key differences lie in the theory of affect adopted. Critical discursive psychology remains more committed to analyses of the ideological. A further aim of this article is to illustrate the main concerns of discursive research on affective practice. To this end, an extract from a focus group exchange concerning women’s friendships and the experience of being rejected by a friend is explored, highlighting the patterning of everyday meaning making imbued with emotion, strategic identity work, and the ways in which participants mobilise psy techniques and vocabularies to hopeful ends.

Keywords

Affect Sedgwick Critical discursive psychology Psychosocial methods The psy-complex 

Notes

References

  1. Ahmed, S. 2004. Affective economies. Social Text 22 (279): 117–139.Google Scholar
  2. Barbour, K., and A. Hitchmough. 2014. Experiencing affect through site-specific dance. Emotion, Space and Society 12 (1): 63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2013.11.004.Google Scholar
  3. Berlant, L. 2008. The female complaint: The unfinished business of sentimentality in American culture. Durham, NY: Duke.Google Scholar
  4. Billig, M. 1991. Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Blackman, L. 2011. Affect, performance and queer subjectivities. Cultural Studies 25 (2): 183–199.Google Scholar
  6. Blackman, L., et al. 2008. Creating subjectivities. Subjectivity 22: 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.8.Google Scholar
  7. Blackman, L. 2013. Habit and affect: Revitalizing a forgotten history. Body and Society 19 (2–3): 186–216.Google Scholar
  8. Blackman, L. 2001. Hearing voices: Embodiment and experience. London: Free Association Press.Google Scholar
  9. Blackman, L. 2012. Immaterial bodies: Affect, embodiment, mediation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Blackman, L., and C. Venn. 2010. Affect. Body & Society 16 (1): 7–28.Google Scholar
  11. Blackman, L., and V. Walkerdine. 2001. Mass hysteria: Critical psychology and media studies. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, S., & Stenner, P. 2009. Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Burkitt, I. 2014. Emotions and social relations. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  15. Clough, P.T. 2008. The affective turn: Political Economy, Biomedia and Bodies. Theory, Culture & Society 25 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  16. Clough, P.T. 2009. The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory 12 (1): 43–61.Google Scholar
  17. Cromby, J. 2015. Feeling bodies: Embodying psychology. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Cvetkovich, A. 2012. Depression: A public feeling. Durham, NY: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dobson, A.S., and A. Kanai. 2018. From “can-do” girls to insecure and angry: Affective dissonances in young women’s post-recessional media. Feminist Media Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1546206.Google Scholar
  20. Edley, N. 2001. Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In Discourse as data: A guide for analysis, eds. M. Wetherall, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates, 189–228. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, D. 1997. Discourse and cognition. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Edwards, D., & Potter, J., 1992. Discursive psychology. London, Newbruy Park, Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Everts, J., and L. Wagner. 2012. Guest editorial: Practising emotions. Emotion, Space and Society 5: 174–176.Google Scholar
  24. Facundo, A.C. 2016. Oscillations of literary theory: The paranoid imperative and queer reparative. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  25. Figlerowicz, M. 2012. Affect theory dossier: An introduction. Qui Parle 20 (2): 3–18.Google Scholar
  26. Garcia, L.-M. 2016. Beats, flesh, and grain: sonic tactility and affect in electronic dance music. Sound Studies 1 (1): 59–76.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2015.1079072.Google Scholar
  27. Gill, R. 2008. Culture and subjectivity in neoliberal and postfeminist times. Subjectivity 25 (1): 432–445.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2008.28.Google Scholar
  28. Gill, R., and A. Kanai. 2018. Mediating neoliberal capitalism: Affect, subjectivity and inequality. Journal of Communication 68 (2): 318–326.Google Scholar
  29. Hemmings, C. 2005. Invoking affect: Cultural theory and the ontological turn. Cultural Studies 19 (5): 548–567.Google Scholar
  30. Henriques, J., et al. 1984. Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  31. Illouz, E. 2009. Saving the modern soul: Therapy, emotions, and the culture of self-help. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jensen, T. 2010. ‘What kind of mum are you at the moment?’ Supernanny and the psychologising of classed embodiment. Subjectivity 3 (2): 170–192.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.2.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, K. 2015. Sexuality: A psychosocial manifesto. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  34. Klein, M. 1946. Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis 27: 99–110.Google Scholar
  35. Knudsen, B.T., and S. Carsten. 2015. Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect, eds. B.T. Knudsen and S. Carsten. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Laurier, E., and C. Philo. 2006. Possible geographies: A passing encounter in a café. Area 38 (4): 353–363.Google Scholar
  37. Leys, R. 2011. The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry 37 (3): 434–472.  https://doi.org/10.1086/659353.Google Scholar
  38. Liebert, R.J. 2017. Beside-the-mind: An unsettling, reparative reading of paranoia. Subjectivity 10 (1): 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0015-5.Google Scholar
  39. Liu, W. 2017. Toward a queer psychology of affect: Restarting from shameful places. Subjectivity 10 (1): 44–62.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-016-0014-6.Google Scholar
  40. Love, H. 2014. Truth and consequences: On paranoid reading and reparative reading. Criticism 41 (9): 4–9.Google Scholar
  41. Martinussen, M. 2018a. Critical social psychology and interdisciplinary studies of personal life: Greater than the sum of its parts. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 13 (1): 1–13.Google Scholar
  42. Martinussen, M. 2018b. Reason, season or life? Heterorelationality and the limits of intimacy between women friends. Sociological Research Online.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418816334.Google Scholar
  43. Martinussen, M. 2019. Significant others? Friendships between women and neoliberal relational life (Doctoral Thesis). Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  44. Martinussen, M., M. Wetherell, and V. Braun. in press. Just being and being bad: Female friendship as a refuge in neoliberal times. Feminism & Psychology.Google Scholar
  45. Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the virtual: Movements, affect, sensation. Durham, NY: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  46. McCormack, D.P. 2008. Geographies for moving bodies: Thinking, dancing, spaces. Geography Compass 2 (6): 1822–1836.Google Scholar
  47. McLeod, J., and K. Wright. 2009. The talking cure in everyday life: Gender, generations and friendship. Sociology 43 (1): 122–139.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508099101.Google Scholar
  48. Muñoz, J.E. 2006. Feeling brown, feeling down: Latina affect, the performativity of race, and the depressive position. Signs 31 (3): 675–688.Google Scholar
  49. Parker, I. 1999. Critical psychology: Critical links. Annual Review of Crticial Psychology 1: 3–18.Google Scholar
  50. Pile, S. 2010. Emotions and affect in recent human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 35 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar
  51. Potter, J. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  52. Reckwitz, A. 2012. Affective spaces: a praxeological outlook. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 16 (2): 241–258.Google Scholar
  53. Reckwitz, A. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263.Google Scholar
  54. Reddy, W. 2009. Historical research on the self and emotions. Emotion Review 1 (4): 302–315.Google Scholar
  55. Reddy, W. 2001. The navigation of feeling: A framework for the history of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Ricœur, P. 1970. Freud and philosophy; an essay on interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Rose, N. 1996. Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rose, N. 1999. Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self, 2nd edn. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  59. Scheer, M. 2012. Are emotions a kind of practice (and is that what makes them have a history)? A bourdieuian approach to understanding emotion. History and Theory 51: 193–220.Google Scholar
  60. Sedgwick, E.K. 1996. An introduction: Queerer than fiction. Studies in the Novel 28 (3): 277–280.Google Scholar
  61. Sedgwick, E.K. 2007. Melanie Klein and the difference affect makes. South Atlantic Quarterly 106 (3): 625–642.Google Scholar
  62. Sedgwick, E.K. 1997. Paranoid reading and reparative reading; or, you’re so paranoid, you probably think this introduction is about you. In Novel Gazing: Queer readings in fiction, ed. E.K. Sedgwick, 1–37. Durham, NY and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Sedgwick, E.K. 2003. Touching feeling. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Sedgwick, E.K., and A. Frank. 1995. Shame in the cybernetic fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins. Critical Inquiry 21 (2): 496–522.Google Scholar
  65. Shahani, N. 2012. Queer retrosexualities: The Politics of reparative return. Lanham, MD: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Swan, E. 2008. “You make me feel like a woman”: Therapeutic cultures and the contagion of femininity. Gender, Work and Organization 15 (1): 88–107.Google Scholar
  67. Taylor, S. 2015. Discursive and psychosocial? Theorising a complex contemporary subject. Qualitative Research in Psychology 12 (1): 37–41.Google Scholar
  68. Walkerdine, V. 2007. Children, gender and videogames: Towards a relational approach to multimedia. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  69. Walkerdine, V. 2010. Communal beingness and affect: An exploration of trauma in an ex-industrial community. Body and Society 16 (1): 91–116.Google Scholar
  70. Walkerdine, V. 1990. Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  71. Walkerdine, V., and H. Lucey. 1989. Democracy in the kitchen. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wetherell, M. 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society 9 (3): 387–412.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926598009003005.Google Scholar
  73. Wetherell, M. 2006. Formulating selves: Social psychology and the study of identity. Social Psychological Review 8 (2): 62–72.Google Scholar
  74. Wetherell, M. 2007. A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 661–681.Google Scholar
  75. Wetherell, M. 2008. Subjectivity or psycho-discursive practices? Investigating complex intersectional identities. Subjectivity 22 (2008): 73–81.Google Scholar
  76. Wetherell, M. 2012. Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  77. Wetherell, M. 2013. Affect and discourse—What’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity 6 (4): 349–368.  https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13.Google Scholar
  78. Wetherell, M. 2015. Trends in the turn to affect: A Social psychological critique. Body & Society. http://bod.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/03/27/1357034X14539020.abstract.
  79. Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. 1992. Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Wetherell, M., et al. 2015. Settling space and covering the nation: Some conceptual considerations in analysing affect and discourse. Emotion, Space and Society 16: 56–64.Google Scholar
  81. Wetherell, M., L. Smith, and G. Campbell. 2018. Introduction: Affective Heritage Practices. In Emotion, affective practice and the past in the present, eds. M. Wetherell, L. Smith, G. Campbell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Wiegman, R. 2014. The times we’re in: Queer feminist criticism and the reparative “turn”. Feminist Theory 15 (1): 4–25.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700113513081a.Google Scholar
  83. Wright, K. 2008. Theorizing therapeutic culture: Past influences, future directions. Journal of Sociology 44 (4): 321–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations