Advertisement

Subjectivity

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 287–302 | Cite as

Visualizing the included subject: photography, progress narratives and intellectual disability

  • Niklas Altermark
  • Emil Edenborg
Original Article

Abstract

By examining photographic depictions of subjects labeled as ‘intellectually disabled’, this article theorizes how photography performs the ideological function of producing narratives of historical progression. Recurrent representations of, on the one hand, a dark past of state institutionalization and repression and, on the other hand, the present as a time when intellectually disabled people are active, included and happy, function to locate oppression in a bygone era, which effectively obscures how power has transformed rather than disappeared. This relates to how the narrative break between the past exclusion and present inclusion conceals an inherent paradox in the constitution of intellectually disabled subjectivity; at the same time, members of this group are both included by citizenship and classified as lacking the necessary characteristics of the ideal citizen.

Keywords

Visibility Disability Disability studies Narrative Historical narratives 

References

  1. Altermark, Niklas. 2018. Citizenship Inclusion and Intellectual Disability: Biopolitics Post-Institutionalisation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 1993. Camera Lucida. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Colin. 1992. Disabling Imagery and the Media: An Exploration of the Principles for Media Representations of Disabled People. Krumlin: The British Council of Organisations of Disabled People and Ryburn Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  4. Bogdan, R., M. Elks, and J.A. Knoll. 2012. Picturing Disability: Beggar, Freak, Citizen, and Other Photographic Rhetoric. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, W. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. 2010. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable?. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Carey, A.C. 2009. On the Margins of Citizenship: Intellectual Disability and Civil Rights in Twentieth Century America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clement, T., and C. Bigby. 2010. Group Homes for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Encouraging Inclusion and Participation. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Crow, J., L. Crow, and A. Ormston. 1990. Photography and Disability in England. London: The Arts Council.Google Scholar
  11. Drinkwater, C. 2005. Supported Living and the Production of Individuals. In Foucault and the Government of Disability, ed. S. Tremain. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Edenborg, E. 2017. Politics of Visibility and Belonging: From Russia’s “Homosexual Propaganda” Laws to the Ukraine War. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elks, M.A. 2005. Visual Indictment: A Contextual Analysis of the Kallikak Family Photographs. Mental Retardation 43 (4): 268–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucualt, M. 1989. The Birth of the Clinic. An Archaeology of Medical Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. 1990. The History of Sexuality. The Will to Knowledge, vol. 1. Penguin: Hamondsworth.Google Scholar
  16. Fudge Schormans, A. 2014. ‘Weightless?’: Disrupting Relations of Power In/Through Photographic Imagery of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities. Disability & Society 29 (5): 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garland-Thomson, R. 2001. Seeing the Disabled: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography. In The New Disability History: American Perspectives, ed. Paul K. Longmore and Lauri Umansky. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garland-Thomson, R. 2002. The Politics of Staring: Visual Rhetorics of Disability in Popular Photography. In Disability Studies: Enabling the Humanities, ed. Sharon L. Snyder, Brenda Jo Brueggemann, and Rosemarie Garland- Thomson. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
  19. Grunewald, K. 2008. Från idiot till medborgare (’From Idiot to Citizen’). Stockholm: Gothia Förlag.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, S. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_ OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Haritaworn, J. 2015. Queer Lovers and Hateful Others: Regenerating Violent Times and Places. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Inclusion International. 2014. Independent but not Alone: A Global Report on the Right to Decide. London: Inclusion International.Google Scholar
  24. Lidchi, H. 1997. The Poetics and the Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures. In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, ed. Stuart Hall. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Pedwell, C. 2017. Mediated Habits: Images, Networked Affect and Social Change. Subjectivity 10: 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scott, J.W. 2007. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Shildrick, M. 1999. This Body Which is Not One: Dealing with Differences. Body & Society 5 (2–3): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shildrick, M., and D.L. Steinberg. 2015. Estranged Bodies: Shifting Paradigms and the Biomedical Imaginary. Body & Society 21 (3): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siebers, T. 2010. Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sontag, S. (2002) Looking at War: Photography’s View of Devastation and Death. The New Yorker, 9 December 2002.Google Scholar
  31. Spivak, G.C. 1999. A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Towards a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stiker, H.-J. 1999. A History of Disability. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  33. Walmsley, J. 2005. Institutionalization: A Historical Perspective. In Deinstitutionalization and People with Intellectual Disabilities, ed. Kelley Johnson and Rannveig Traustadóttir. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Wehmeyer, M.L. 2013. The Story of Intellectual Disability: An Evolution of Meaning, Understanding, and Public Perception. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Swedish Institute of International AffairsStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations