The subject of circulation: on the digital subject’s technical individuations
The concept of the digital subject proposes that online subjectivity is a mediated construct. This article extends this concept by arguing that online subjectivity is not a property of human users, but of digital subjects enacted in circulating data. It develops the digital subject by, first, using Phillip Agre’s concept of “grammars of action” to argue that computational architectures exclude humans from the position of the user; and, second, using Gilbert Simondon’s and Yuk Hui’s philosophies of technology to posit the digital subject as a determinate technical entity that, as per Hui’s reworking of Simondon, inhabits a “digital milieu”. Online, this digital subject inverts the human–technology relationship. It individuates by entering circulation, excluding us from individuating whilst individuating us in turn. This article expands upon this claim by analysing projects by Amalia Ulman and Zach Blas and their thematisation of visibility, identity and authenticity in online subjectivity.
KeywordsSubjectivity Digital Media Circulation Individuation Simondon Post-internet art
- Bardini, T. 2000. Bootstrapping: Douglas Engelbart, Coevolution, and the Origins of Personal Computing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Blas, Zach. 2013–2016. Face Cages [Installation]. Various Locations.Google Scholar
- Blas, Z. 2015. Contra-Internet Aesthetics. In You Are Here: Art After the Internet, ed. O. Kholeif, 86–97. Cornerhouse and SPACE: Manchester and London.Google Scholar
- Bratton, B. 2015. The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- Bucher, T. 2015. Networking, or What the Social Means in Social Media. Social Media + Society 1: 1–2.Google Scholar
- Canguilhem, G. (2008) The living and its milieu. In: Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 98–120.Google Scholar
- Cramer, F., and M. Fuller. 2008. Interface. In Software Studies: A Lexicon, 149–152. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dean, A. 2016. Closing the Loop. The New Inquiry, 1 March. https://thenewinquiry.com/closing-the-loop/. Accessed 10 September 2017.
- Goriunova, O. In press. The digital subject: People as data persons. Theory, Culture & Society.Google Scholar
- Gronlund, M. 2016. Contemporary Art and Digital Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Helmond, A. 2015. The Platformization of the Web: Making Web Data Platform Ready. Social Media + Society 1 (2): 1–11.Google Scholar
- Hui, Y. 2017. Preface: The time of execution. In DATA Browser 06: Executing Practices, ed. H. Pritchard, E. Snodgrass, and M. Tyzlik-Carver, 23–32. New York: AUTONOMEDIA.Google Scholar
- Kinsey, C. 2016. The Instagram artist who fooled thousands. BBC Culture, March 7. http://www.bbc.co.uk/culture/story/20160307-the-instagram-artist-who-fooled-thousands. Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
- Kittler, F. (1999) Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated by G. Winthrop-Young and M. Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
- Lialina, O. 2012. Turing Complete User. Contemporary Home Computing 14. http://contemporary-home-computing.org/turing-complete-user/.
- Lialina, O. 2017. Not Art&Tech. In Across & Beyond—A Transmediale Reader on Post-digital Practices, Concepts and Institutions, ed. R. Bishop et al., 135–147. Berlin: Sternberg Press.Google Scholar
- Papacharissi, Z. 2011. Conclusion: A Networked Self. In A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, ed. Z. Papacharissi, 304–318. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Phillips, W. 2015. This is Why We can’t have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
- Quaintance, M. 2015. Right Shift: On the End of Post-internet Art. Art Monthly, p. 387, June. http://www.artmonthly.co.uk/magazine/site/article/right-shift-by-morgan-quaintance-june-2015. Accessed 10 October 2015.
- Shaviro, S. 2014. Non-phenomenological Thought. Speculations V: 40–56.Google Scholar
- Simondon, G. 1992. The Genesis of the Individual. In Incorporations, ed. J. Crary and S. Kwinter, 296–319. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- Simondon, G. 2017. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects (C. Malaspina and J. Rogrove, Trans.). Minneapolis: Univocal Publishing.Google Scholar
- Stiegler, B. 1998. Technics and Time: The Fault of Epimetheus (R. Beardsworth and G. Collins, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stiegler, B. 2014. Symbolic Misery, Vol. 1: The Hyperindustrial Epoch (B. Norman, Trans.). London: Polity.Google Scholar
- Ulman, A. 2014. Excellences and Perfections [Digital performance]. Instagram; Various locations.Google Scholar
- Wark, S., and M. Wark. In press. Circulation and Its Discontents. In Post Memes: Seizing the Memes of Production, eds. A. Brown and F. Russell. Santa Barbara: Punctum Books.Google Scholar