Explaining mental health recovery in the context of structural disadvantage: the unrealised potential of critical realism

  • Dimitar KaradzhovEmail author
Original Article


Despite the acknowledgement that mental health inequalities are shaped by the interaction of macro-level (structural) and micro-level (individual, agentic) powers, dominant paradigms in mental health research have been ill-equipped to integrate those different levels of influence theoretically and empirically. As a result, an explanatory ‘deficit’ persists as to the causal mechanisms underpinning the impact of social inequalities on mental well-being, particularly mental health recovery. To redress this gap, critical realism has been put forward as a useful metatheoretical alternative. This paper begins by offering a succinct critique of extant mental health recovery research. Mental health recovery is problematised in relation to its dynamic embeddedness in contextual, including macro-structural, conditions. The core tenets and principles of critical realism are then invoked to address the identified philosophical and theoretical inadequacies. This paper argues that critical realism offers promise for explaining how inequality-generating mechanisms, such as social exclusion, may impede recovery. The analytico-conceptual potential of critical realism has remained largely untapped by the extant mental health scholarship. Critical realism offers a holistic and inclusive set of conceptual tools to re-examine the structure–agency nexus in order to advance mental health recovery and inequalities research, and an equity-based policy agenda.


Health inequalities Mental health Recovery Critical realism Public health 



  1. Abel, T., and K.L. Frohlich. 2012. Capitals and capabilities: Linking structure and agency to reduce health inequalities. Social Science and Medicine 74 (2): 236–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus, J.E., and A.M. Clark. 2012. Using critical realism in nursing and health research: Promise and challenges. Nursing Inquiry 19 (1): 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony, W.A. 1993. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal 16 (4): 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M.S. 2003. Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergin, M., J.S. Wells, and S. Owen. 2008. Critical realism: A philosophical framework for the study of gender and mental health. Nursing Philosophy 9 (3): 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhaskar, R. 1989. Reclaiming reality. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Bhaskar, R., and B. Danermark. 2006. Metatheory, interdisciplinarity and disability research: A critical realist perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 8 (4): 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blom, B., and S. Morén. 2011. Analysis of generative mechanisms. Journal of Critical Realism 10 (1): 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonnington, O., and D. Rose. 2014. Exploring stigmatisation among people diagnosed with either bipolar disorder or borderline personality disorder: A critical realist analysis. Social Science and Medicine 123: 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clifton, A., J. Repper, D. Banks, and J. Remnant. 2013. Co-producing social inclusion: The structure/agency conundrum. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 20 (6): 514–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, C., M. McCrory, M. Mackenzie, and G. McCartney. 2015. Social theory and health inequalities: Critical realism and a transformative activist stance? Social Theory & Health 13 (3–4): 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craig, D., and C. Bigby. 2015. Critical realism in social work research: Examining participation of people with intellectual disability. Australian Social Work 68 (3): 309–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danermark, B., M. Ekström, L. Jakobsen, and J.C. Karlsson. (2002). Explaining society: Critical realism in the social sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Health. 2001. The journey to recovery—The Government’s vision for mental health care., Accessed 15 January, 2019.
  15. Duff, C. 2016. Atmospheres of recovery: Assemblages of health. Environment and Planning A 48 (1): 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn, J.R. 2012. “Explanation”, philosophy and theory in health inequalities research: Towards a critical realist approach. In Rethinking social epidemiology, ed. P. O’Campo and J.R. Dunn, 23–42. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farkas, M. 2007. The vision of recovery today: What it is and what it means for services. World Psychiatry 6 (2): 68.Google Scholar
  18. Fitzpatrick, S. 2005. Explaining homelessness: a critical realist perspective. Housing, Theory and Society 22 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forbes, A., and S.P. Wainwright. 2001. On the methodological, theoretical and philosophical context of health inequalities research: A critique. Social Science and Medicine 53 (6): 801–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fullagar, S., and W. O’Brien. 2014. Social recovery and the move beyond deficit models of depression: A feminist analysis of mid-life women’s self-care practices. Social Science and Medicine 117: 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammersley, M. 2002. Research as emancipatory: The case of Bhaskar’s critical realism. Journal of Critical Realism 1 (1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harper, D., and E. Speed. 2014. Uncovering recovery: The resistible rise of recovery and resilience. In De-Medicalizing Misery II, ed. E. Speed, J. Moncrieff, and M. Rapley, 40–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hopper, K. 2007. Rethinking social recovery in schizophrenia: What a capabilities approach might offer. Social Science and Medicine 65 (5): 868–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houston, S. 2009. Further reflections on Habermas’s contribution to discourse in child protection: An examination of power in social life. British Journal of Social Work 40 (6): 1736–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houston, S. 2010. Prising open the black box: Critical realism, action research and social work. Qualitative Social Work 9 (1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. International Social Science Council, the Institute of Development Studies, and UNESCO. 2016. World social science report 2016: Challenging inequalities: Pathways to a just world.
  27. Karadzhov, D., Y. Yuan, and L. Bond. 2019. Coping amidst an assemblage of disadvantage: A qualitative metasynthesis of first-person accounts of managing severe mental illness while homeless. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. Scholar
  28. Kartalova-O’Doherty, Y., and D.T. Doherty. 2011. Recovering from mental health problems: Perceived positive and negative effects of medication on reconnecting with life. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 57 (6): 610–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leamy, M., V. Bird, C. Le Boutillier, J. Williams, and M. Slade. 2011. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. The British Journal of Psychiatry 199 (6): 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manuel, T. 2006. Envisioning the possibilities for a good life: Exploring the public policy implications of intersectionality theory. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (3/4): 173–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McNeill, T., and D.B. Nicholas. 2017. Creating and applying knowledge for critical social work practice: Reflections on epistemology, research, and evidence-based practice. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work. Scholar
  32. Morrow, M., and L.H. Malcoe (eds.). 2017. Critical inquiries for social justice in mental health. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  33. Morrow, M., and J. Weisser. 2012. Towards a social justice framework of mental health recovery. Studies in Social Justice 6 (1): 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. 2005. Transforming mental health care in America. The Federal Action Agenda: First Steps. Accessed 15 January, 2019.
  35. Ng, E., and C. Muntaner. 2014. A critical approach to macrosocial determinants of population health: Engaging scientific realism and incorporating social conflict. Current Epidemiology Reports 1 (1): 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Noiseux, S., D.T. St-Cyr, E. Corin, P.L. St-Hilaire, R. Morissette, C. Leclerc, D. Fleury, L. Vigneault, and F. Gagnier. 2010. The process of recovery of people with mental illness: The perspectives of patients, family members and care providers: Part 1. BMC Health Services Research 10 (1): 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noiseux, S., D.S.C. Tribble, C. Leclerc, N. Ricard, E. Corin, R. Morissette, and R. Lambert. 2009. Developing a model of recovery in mental health. BMC Health Services Research 9 (1): 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Norris, A.N., A. Zajicek, and Y. Murphy-Erby. 2010. Intersectional perspective and rural poverty research: Benefits, challenges and policy implications. Journal of Poverty 14 (1): 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Östlin, P., T. Schrecker, R. Sadana, J. Bonnefoy, L. Gilson, C. Hertzman, M.P. Kelly, T. Kjellstrom, R. Labonté, O. Lundberg, and C. Muntaner. 2011. Priorities for research on equity and health: Towards an equity-focused health research agenda. PLoS Medicine 8 (11): e1001115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parsell, C., E. Eggins, and G. Marston. 2016. Human agency and social work research: A systematic search and synthesis of social work literature. British Journal of Social Work 47 (1): 238–255.Google Scholar
  41. Pickett, K.E., and R.G. Wilkinson. 2010. Inequality: An underacknowledged source of mental illness and distress. The British Journal of Psychiatry 197 (6): 426–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pilgrim, D. 2014. Some implications of critical realism for mental health research. Social Theory & Health 12 (1): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pilgrim, D., and A. McCranie. 2013. Recovery and mental health: A critical sociological account. London, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pilgrim, D., and A. Rogers. 1999. Mental health policy and the politics of mental health: A three tier analytical framework. Policy & Politics 27 (1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Popay, J., G. Williams, C. Thomas, and T. Gatrell. 1998. Theorising inequalities in health: The place of lay knowledge. Sociology of Health & Illness 20 (5): 619–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rütten, A., and P. Gelius. 2011. The interplay of structure and agency in health promotion: Integrating a concept of structural change and the policy dimension into a multi-level model and applying it to health promotion principles and practice. Social Science and Medicine 73 (7): 953–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sayer, A. 1992. Method in social science: A realist approach, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Sayer, A. 2000. Realism and social science. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scottish Government. 2012. Mental health strategy for Scotland: 2012-2015. Accessed 15 January, 2019.
  50. Shaw, M. 2004. Housing and public health. Annual Review of Public Health 25: 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shinn, M. 2010. Homelessness, poverty, and social exclusion in the United States and Europe. European Journal on Homelessness 4: 19–44.Google Scholar
  52. Slade, M., M. Amering, and L. Oades. 2008. Recovery: An international perspective. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 17 (2): 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, C. 2011. What is a person?: Rethinking humanity, social life, and the moral good from the person up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  54. Somerville, P. 2013. Understanding homelessness. Housing, Theory and Society 30 (4): 384–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tang, L. 2018. Recovery, hope and agency: The meaning of hope amongst chinese users of mental health services in the UK. The British Journal of Social Work 49 (2): 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tew, J., S. Ramon, M. Slade, V. Bird, J. Melton, and C. Le Boutillier. 2012. Social factors and recovery from mental health difficulties: A review of the evidence. The British Journal of Social Work 42 (3): 443–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. UK Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. Action on mental health—A guide to promoting social inclusion. Accessed 15 January, 2019.
  58. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2006. From exclusion to belonging: Transforming mental health care in America. Accessed 15 January, 2019.
  59. Vandekinderen, C., G. Roets, and G. Van Hove. 2014. Untangling the nonrecyclable citizen: A critical reconceptualization of responsibility in recovery. Qualitative Health Research 24 (10): 1418–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wainwright, S.P., and A. Forbes. 2000. Philosophical problems with social research on health inequalities. Health Care Analysis 8 (3): 259–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watson, D.P. 2012. The evolving understanding of recovery: What does the sociology of mental health have to offer? Humanity & Society 36 (4): 290–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Williams, S.J. 2003. Beyond meaning, discourse and the empirical world: Critical realist reflections on health. Social Theory & Health 1 (1): 42–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Williams, C.C., M. Almeida, and Y. Knyahnytska. 2015. Towards a biopsychosociopolitical frame for recovery in the context of mental illness. British Journal of Social Work 45 (suppl_1): i9–i26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wynn Jr., D., and C.K. Williams. 2012. Principles for conducting critical realist case study research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 9: 787–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yanos, P.T., B.J. Felton, S. Tsemberis, and V.A. Frye. 2007. Exploring the role of housing type, neighborhood characteristics, and lifestyle factors in the community integration of formerly homeless persons diagnosed with mental illness. Journal of Mental Health 16 (6): 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Health Policy, School of Social Work and Social Policy, International Public Policy InstituteUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations