Advertisement

Social Theory & Health

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 292–306 | Cite as

Institutional ethnography: a sociology of discovery—in conversation with Dorothy Smith

  • Grainne P. Kearney
  • Michael K. Corman
  • Gerard J. Gormley
  • Nigel D. Hart
  • Jennifer L. Johnston
  • Dorothy E. Smith
Interview

Those located at the intersection of sociology and research in healthcare may be familiar with the very distinctive teachings of Dr. Dorothy Smith (see 1987, 1990a, b, 1999, 2005, 2006, 2014). The intellectual explorations throughout her career culminated in an approach to inquiry, known as Institutional Ethnography (IE) in the 1980s, which she continues to refine through dialogue with scholars from many disciplines. Her personal experiences inflamed her to criticize what she considered the deficiencies of the “mainstream” sociology she had been taught and that she was then teaching and, more broadly, positivist ways of knowing. She considers these ways to “clamp[s] a conceptual framework over any project of inquiry; such a framework determines how the actual will be attended to, dominating and constraining selection and interpretation” (Smith 2005, p. 50). Smith turned to her reading of Marx’s materialism, Garfinkel’s ethnomethodology, Mead and Bakhtin’s insights on language, to name...

References

  1. Billig, M. 2013. Learn to write badly: how to succeed in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corman, M.K. 2017. Paramedics on and off the streets: Emergency medical services in the age of technological governance. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Griffith, A.I., and D.E. Smith. 2014. Under new public management: Institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Kearney, G.P., J.L. Johnston, N.D. Hart, M.K. Corman, and G.J. Gormley. 2018. Protocol : Exploring the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) using institutional ethnography. International Journal of Educational Research. 88: 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Rankin, J., and M. Campbell. 2006. Managing to nurse: Inside Canada’s health care reform. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Smith, D. 1987. The Everyday World As Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Smith, D. 1990a. Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, D. 1990b. The conceptual practices of power: A feminist sociology of knowledge. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Smith, D. 1999. Writing the social: Critique, theory and investigations. Toronto: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  10. Smith, D. 2005. Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Toronto: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
  11. Smith, D. 2006. Institutional ethnography as practice. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, D.E., and S.M. Turner. 2014. Incorporating texts into institutional ethnography. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grainne P. Kearney
    • 1
  • Michael K. Corman
    • 2
  • Gerard J. Gormley
    • 3
  • Nigel D. Hart
    • 1
  • Jennifer L. Johnston
    • 1
  • Dorothy E. Smith
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Centre for Medical EducationQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK
  2. 2.Sociology and Anthropology and Faculty of NursingUniversity of Prince Edward IslandCharlottetownCanada
  3. 3.Clinical Skills Education Centre, Centre for Medical EducationQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK
  4. 4.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  5. 5.Professor Emeritus of the Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations