Advertisement

Social Theory & Health

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 389–406 | Cite as

The gift in A&E: re-framing the medical case presentation through Mauss

  • Caroline PelletierEmail author
  • Vasiliki Chrysikou
  • Will Gibson
  • Sophie Park
  • Fiona Stevenson
Original Article

Abstract

Case presentations have totemic significance in medical sociology, in which they are analysed as emblematic of medical professional culture. This article makes a case for conceptualising these exchanges in terms of Mauss’ account of gift-giving, which theorises sociality in terms of obligations voluntarily incurred and reciprocated and the performative recognition of hierarchy. This contrasts with two alternatives in existing literature: the case presentation as an instance of pedagogically oriented supervision and legitimate peripheral participation; and as representative of professional discourse more generally. We make our case for re-framing the case presentation in relation to video and audio data generated within a study of an Accident and Emergency department in the UK. We conclude that Mauss’ concept of community allows us to see discursive phenomena that have been overlooked, and to theorise the work of junior doctors in terms of collegiality in a hierarchically organised profession, by contrast to a defective version of the work of their superiors or the manifestation of singular professional discourse.

Keywords

Hospital ethnography Case presentation Discourse analysis Ritual Socialisation Institutional order Emergency department 

References

  1. Anspach, R.A. 1988. Notes on the sociology of medical discourse: the language of case presentation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 29: 357–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antaki, C., H. Hotkoop-Steenstra, and M. Rapley. 2000. “Brilliant. Next question…” High-grade assessment sequences in the completion of interactional units. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33 (3): 235–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, P. 1994. Rhetoric as skill in a medical setting. In Qualitative studies in health and medicine, ed. M. Bloor and P. Taraborrelli, 110–130. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, P. 1995. Medical talk and medical work: The liturgy of the clinic. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, P. 1999. Medical Discourse, evidentiality and the construction of professional responsibility. In Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management, ed. S. Sarangi and C. Roberts, 75–108. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atkinson, P. 2004. The discursive construction of competence and responsibility in medical collegial talk. Communication and Medicine 1: 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchbinder, M. 2017. Keeping out and getting in: reframing emergency department gatekeeping as structural competence. Sociology of Health and Illness.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan, M.Y. 2015. The oral case presentation: toward a performance-based rhetorical model for teaching and learning. Medical Education Online.  https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v20.28565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Douglas, M. 2002. Introduction. In The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies, ed. M. Mauss, 1–9. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson, F. 1999. Appropriation of voice and presentation of self as a fellow physician: aspects of a discourse of apprenticeship in medicine. In Talk, work and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, ed. S. Saranji and C. Roberts, 109–143. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fritsch, M. 2015. The gift of nature in Mauss and Derrida. The Oxford Literary Review 37: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodwin, D. 2014. Decision-making and accountability: differences of distribution. Sociology of Health & Illness 36 (1): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haber, R.J., and L.A. Lingard. 2001. Learning oral presentation skills: A rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16: 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilligloss, B. 2014. Selling patients and other metaphors: a discourse analysis of the interpretative frames that shape emergency department admission handoffs. Social Science and Medicine 102: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hillman, A. 2013. ‘Why must I wait?’ The performance of legitimacy in a hospital emergency department. Sociology of Health & Illness 36 (4): 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hughes, D. 1988. When nurse knows best: some aspects of nurse/doctor interaction in a casualty department. Sociology of Health & Illness 10 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hunter, K.M. 1991. Doctor’s stories: The narrative structure of medical knowledge. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Karsenti, B. 1994. Marcel Mauss: le fait social total. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  19. Kendrick, K.H., and P. Drew. 2016. Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kennedy, T.J.T., G. Regehr, G.R. Baker, et al. 2009. Preserving professional credibility: grounded theory study of medical trainees’ requests for clinical support. BMJ 338: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Konstantinou, E., and R. Fincham. 2010. Not sharing but trading: Applying a Maussian exchange framework to knowledge management. Human Relations 64: 823–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lingard, L., K. Garwood, C.F. Schryer, et al. 2003a. A certain art of uncertainty: Case presentation and the development of professional identity. Social Science and Medicine 56: 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lingard, L., C.F. Schryer, K. Garwood, et al. 2003b. ‘Talking the talk’: School and workplace genre tension in clerkship case presentations. Medical Education 37: 612–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lingard, L., and R.J. Haber. 1999. What do we mean by “relevance”? A clinical and rhetorical definition with implications for teaching and learning the case-presentation format. Academic Medicine 74: S124–S127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mauss M. 1924. Essai sur le don: forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques, http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/mauss_marcel/socio_et_anthropo/2_essai_sur_le_don/essai_sur_le_don.pdf.
  27. Nugus, P., J. Bridges, and J. Braithwaite. 2009. Selling patients. BMJ 339: 1444–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pomerantz, A. 2003. Modeling as a teaching strategy in clinical training: when does it work? In Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper, ed. P. Glenn, C. LeBaron, and J. Mandelbaum, 381–391. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  29. Pomerantz, A., J. Ende, and F. Erickson. 1995. Precepting conversations in a general medicine clinic. In Talk of the clinic: Explorations in the analysis of medical and therapeutic discourse, ed. G.H. Morris and R.J. Chenail, 151–169. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Saunders, B.F. 2008. CT Suite: The work of diagnosis in the age of non-invasive cutting. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schryer, C.F., and P. Spoel. 2005. Genre theory, healthcare discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 19: 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spafford, M.M., C.F. Schryer, M. Mian, and L. Lingard. 2006. Look who’s talking: teaching and learning using the genre of medical case presentations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 20: 121–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stevenson, F., W. Gibson, C. Pelletier, V. Chrysikou, and S. Park. 2015. Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm. BMC Health Services Research 16 (21): 21.Google Scholar
  34. Stevenson, F., C. Pelletier, W. Gibson, S. Park, and V. Chrysikou. 2018. The co-construction of medical disposals in emergency medicine consultations. Social Science and Medicine.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strong, P.M. 1979/2001. The ceremonial order of the clinic: Parents, doctors and medical bureaucracies. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  36. Wallenburg, I., A. Bont, M.J. Heineman, et al. 2013. Learning to doctor: Tinkering with visibility in residency training. Sociology of Health & Illness 35: 544–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline Pelletier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vasiliki Chrysikou
    • 1
  • Will Gibson
    • 1
  • Sophie Park
    • 2
  • Fiona Stevenson
    • 2
  1. 1.UCL Institute of EducationLondonUK
  2. 2.UCL Faculty of Population Health SciencesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations