Advertisement

Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 452–472 | Cite as

Brexit’s identity politics and the question of subjectivity

  • Nikolay MintchevEmail author
  • Henrietta L. Moore
Original Article

Abstract

This article is about the socially divisive consequences of the UK’s 2016 referendum on membership in the European Union. Rather than redressing the country’s long-standing class divisions, the referendum has exacerbated them by fuelling negative stereotypes and mutual accusations between Leave and Remain supporters. Drawing on psychoanalytic theories of subjectivity, the article argues that support for Leave and Remain is structured by circulations of affect, fantasies of the good life and psychic investments in different experiences of immigration, nationalism, and social and economic inequality.

Keywords

affect immigration nationalism inequality ressentiment 

Notes

References

  1. Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Ashcroft, M. (2016) How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday… and why. http://www.lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/, accessed 19 February 2017.
  3. Balthazar, A.C. (2017) Made in Britain: Brexit, teacups, and the materiality of the nation. American Ethnologist 44(2): 220–224.  https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berlant, L. (2000) The subject of true feeling: Pain, privacy and politics. In: S. Ahmed, J. Kilby et al. (eds.) Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism. London: Routledge, pp. 31–47.Google Scholar
  5. Berlant, L. (2006) Cruel optimism. Differences 17(3): 20–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlant, L. (2011) Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlant, L. and Greenwald, J. (2012) A conversation with Lauren Berlant. Qui Parle 20(2): 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biressi, A. and Nunn, H. (2013) Class and Contemporary British Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Braidotti, R. (2011) Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, W. (1993) Wounded attachment. Political Theory 21(3): 390–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brummer, A. (2016) The great Marmite scam: Shame on Unilever for exploiting Brexit to hike prices. Daily Mail, 14 October. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3837300/The-great-Marmite-scam-Shame-Unilever-exploiting-Brexit-hike-prices-writes-ALEX-BRUMMER.html, accessed 19 February 2017.
  14. Burn-Murdoch, J. (2018) Are Britons changing their minds about Brexit? Financial Times, 1 October. https://www.ft.com/content/fd3582b6-c2f5-11e8-95b1-d36dfef1b89a, accessed 21 November 2018.
  15. Butler, J. (1998) Moral sadism and doubting one’s own love: Kleinian reflections on melancholia. In: J. Phillips and S. Lyndsey (eds.) Reading Melanie Klein. London: Routledge, pp. 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Butler, J. (2005) Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chu, B. (2016) The Brexiteers’ Marmite conspiracy theories exposed their utter ignorance of how markets really work. The Independent, 16 October. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/tesco-unilever-row-brexit-marmite-conspiracy-theories-brexiteers-ignorance-how-markets-work-a7363946.html, accessed 19 February 2017.
  18. Clarke, H., Goodwin, M. and Whiteley, P. (2017) Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (2017) ‘People in this country have had enough of experts’: Brexit and the paradoxes of populism. Critical Policy Studies 11(1): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delanty, G. (2017) A divided nation in a divided Europe: Emerging cleavages and the crisis of European integration. In: W. Outhwaite (ed.) Brexit: Sociological Perspectives. London: Anthem Press, pp. 111–123.Google Scholar
  21. Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (2004) Anti-Oedipus. Translated by R. Hurley, M. Seem and H. Lane. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Dorling, D. (2016) Brexit: The decision of a divided country. BMJ 354: 1–2.Google Scholar
  23. Dorling, D. and Tomlinson, S. (2019) Rule Britannia: Brexit and the End of Empire. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Dustmann, C. and Frattini, T. (2013) The fiscal effects of immigration to the UK. Discussion Paper Series. London: Centre for Research & Analysis of Migration, UCL. http://www.cream-migration.org/publ_uploads/CDP_22_13.pdf, accessed 8 April 2015.
  25. Evans, G. (2017) Brexit Britain: Why we are all postindustrial now. American Ethnologist 44(2): 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ford, R. and Goodwin, M. (2014) Revolt on the Right: Explaining Support for the Radical Right in Britain. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frosh, S. (2018) Rethinking psychoanalysis in the psychosocial. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 23(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gest, J. (2016) The New Minority: White Working Class Politics in an Age of Immigration and Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gest, J. (2018) The White Working Class. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Goodwin, M. and Heath, O. (2016) The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly 87(3): 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greater London Authority (2018) Inclusive London: the mayor’s equality, diversity and inclusion strategy. London. https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/mayors-equality-diversity-inclusion-strategy.pdf, accessed 6 October 2018.
  32. Hage, G. (1996) Nationalist anxiety or the fear of losing your other. Australian Journal of Anthropology 7(2): 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hening, B. and Dorling, D. (2016) The EU referendum. Political Insight 7(2): 20–21.Google Scholar
  34. Hinshelwood, R. (1991) A Dictionary of Kleinian Thought. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  35. Hobolt, S. (2016) The Brexit vote: A divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1259–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hook, D. (2018) Racism and jouissance: Evaluating the ‘racism as (the theft of) enjoyment’ hypothesis. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 23(3): 244–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klein, M. (1940) Mourning and its relation to manic-depressive states. In: The Work of Melanie Klein, Volume 1. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 344–369.Google Scholar
  38. Klein, M. (1955) The psycho-analytic play technique: Its history and significance. In: The Work of Melanie Klein, Volume 3. London: Hogarth Press, pp. 122–140.Google Scholar
  39. Koch, I. (2017) What’s in a vote? Brexit beyond culture wars. American Ethnologist 44(2): 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kristeva, J. (2001) Melanie Klein. Translated by R. Guberman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Laplanche, J. and Pontalis, J.-B. (1973) The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  42. Le Grand, E. (2015) Linking moralisation and class identity: The role of ressentiment and respectability in the social reaction to ‘Chavs’. Sociological Research Online 20(4): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liberini, F., Oswald, A. et al. (2017) Was Brexit caused by the unhappy and the old? IZA Discussion Paper 11059. IZA Institute of Labour Economics. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3045756##, accessed 20 September 2019.
  44. McKenzie, L. (2017) ‘It’s not ideal’: Reconsidering ‘anger’ and ‘apathy’ in the Brexit vote among an invisible working class. Competition & Change 21(3): 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mintchev, N. (2017) What is subjectivity and how can we study it empirically: Understanding the feeling of certainty through psychoanalysis and ethnography. In: N. Mintchev and R. Hinshelwood (eds.) The Feeling of Certainty: Psychosocial Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mintchev, N. (2018) Object-relations and cultural narratives in the analysis of racism: Theorizing subjectivity after Klein and Lacan. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 28(2): 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mintchev, N. and Moore, H. (2018) Super-diversity and the prosperous society. European Journal of Social Theory 21(1): 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mintchev, N. and Moore. H. (2019) Migration and diversity. In: Y. Stavrakakis (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalytic Political Theory. Routledge: London, pp. 392–404.Google Scholar
  49. Moore, H. (2007) The Subject of Anthropology: Gender, Symbolism and Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, H. (2011) Still Life: Hopes, Desires and Satisfactions. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  51. Moore, H. (2013) Fantasies of cosmopolitanism. In: R. Braidotti, P. Hanafinand and B. Blaagaard (eds.) After Cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar
  52. Nietzsche, F. (1967) On the Genealogy of Morals. Translated by W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  53. Popham, G. (2017) Brexit Britain: Ethnography of a rupture. MA thesis. Utrecht University, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  54. Pitcher, B. (2019) Racism and Brexit: Notes towards an antiracist populism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 42(14): 2490–2509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rose, J. (1993) Why War? – Psychoanalysis, Politics, and the Return to Melanie Klein. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Salecl, R. (1992) Nationalism, anti-Semitism, and anti-feminism in Eastern Europe. New German Critique 57(Fall): 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sedgwick, E.K. (2007) Melanie Klein and the difference affect makes. South Atlantic Quarterly 106(3): 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Skeggs, B. (2004) Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Spinoza, B. (1996) Ethics. Translated by E. Curley. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  61. Stavrakakis, Y. and Chrysoloras, N. (2006) (I can’t get no) enjoyment: Lacanian theory and the analysis of nationalism. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 11(2): 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taguieff, P.-A. (2001) The Force of Prejudice: On Racism and Its Doubles. Translated by H. Melehy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  63. Thorleifsson, C. (2016) From coal to Ukip: The struggle over identity in post-industrial Doncaster. History and Anthropology 27(5): 555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Virdee, S. and McGeever, B. (2018) Racism, crisis, Brexit. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41(10): 1802–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  66. Žižek, S. (1991) Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Žižek, S. (1993) Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Global ProsperityUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations