Advertisement

Trauma, identity, and social justice

  • Marilyn CharlesEmail author
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Identity is built upon the early interactions with caretakers through whom we internalize a felt sense of what it means to be ourselves, including values and judgments that have been passed along the generations. Psychoanalytic theory and the attachment literature help us to understand some of the more subversive elements of that transmission process, ways in which unprocessed trauma and unresolved mourning provide a vehicle for passing along positive and negative aspects of personal, familial, and cultural aspects of identity across the generations. Because that transmission process directly impacts ways in which oppression and marginalization skew meanings for future generations, it is important that we consciously recognize and work with projective processes as they play out in our children and in ourselves. In this paper, I discuss ways in which projection and unprocessed shame can inhibit the type of active reflection required for ethical behavior and democratic process.

Keywords

Austen Riggs ethics reflective function use of an object 

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1994/2003) Responsibility and Judgment. Edited by J. Kohn. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination. Edited by M. Holquist. Translated by C. Emerson & M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bion, W.R. (1977) Seven Servants. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  4. Charles, M. (2014) The intergenerational transmission of trauma: Effects on identity development. In: N. Tracey (ed.) Transgenerational Trauma and the Aboriginal Preschool Child: Healing through Intervention. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 133–152.Google Scholar
  5. Charles, M. (2015) Caring for the caregivers: Consulting with therapists in the trenches. Psychoanalytic Inquiry (Special Issue) 35: 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charles, M. (2016) Ashes of remembrance: Reconfiguring the Phoenix. Psychoanalytic Review 103(1): 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charles, M. (2017) A Kleinian/Bionian perspective. In: M. Charles (ed.) Comparative Psychoanalysis: Defining Terms and Building Bridges. Routledge: Relational Perspectives Book Series, pp. 75–96.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, M. and Bellinson, J. (in press) The Importance of  Play in Early Childhood Education: Psychoanalytic, Attachment, and Developmental Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Charles, M. and O’Loughlin, M. (2013) The complex subject of psychosis. Psychoanalysis, Culture and Society (Special Issue: Psychosis) 17(4): 410–421.Google Scholar
  10. Fanon, F. (1952/2008) Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by R. Philcox. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fivush, R., Habermas, T., Waters, T.E.A., and Zaman, W. (2011) The making of autobiographical memory: Intersections of culture, narratives, and identity. International Journal of Psychology 46(5): 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallese, V. (2009) Mirror neurons, embodied simulation, and the neural basis of social identification. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 19(5): 519–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lacan, J. (1977a) The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. In: Écrits. Edited and translated by A. Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 30–113.Google Scholar
  14. Lacan, J. (1977b) The subversion of the subject and the dialectic of desire in the Freudian unconscious. In: Écrits. Edited and translated by A. Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 292–325.Google Scholar
  15. Lacan, J. (1978) Of the subject who is supposed to know, of the first Dyad and of the good. In: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. Translated by A. Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton, pp. 230–243.Google Scholar
  16. LaCapra, D. (1999) Trauma, absence, loss. Critical Inquiry 25(4): 696–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liotti, G. (2004) Trauma, dissociation, and disorganized attachment: Three strands of a single braid. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training 41(4): 772–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lipgar, R.M. and Pines, M. (2002) Building on Bion: Branches. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Main, M. and Hesse, E. (1990) Parent’s unresolved traumatic experiences are related to infant disorganized/disoriented attachment status: Is frightened and/or frightening parental behavior the linking mechanism? In: M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E.M. Cummings (eds.) Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 161–182.Google Scholar
  20. Scheff, T., Daniel, G.R., and Sterphone, J. (2018) Shame and a theory of war and violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior 39 (March–April): 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tappan, M.B. (2006) Reframing internalized oppression and internalized domination: From the psychological to the sociocultural. Teachers College Record 108(10): 2115–2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Winnicott, D.W. (1971) Playing and Reality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Riggs CenterStockbridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations