Advertisement

Maritime Economics & Logistics

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 464–481 | Cite as

Impact of cabotage relaxation in mainland China on the transshipment hub of Hong Kong

  • W. H. WongEmail author
  • E. Wong
  • D. Y. Mo
  • L. Leung
Original Article

Abstract

Hong Kong has benefited from China’s cabotage rule, as foreign ships loading at a Chinese port can transit to Hong Kong and then call at another Chinese port. However, in 2013, China’s cabotage policy was relaxed in Shanghai—whereby China-owned, foreign-flagged vessels are allowed to operate out of Shanghai to other coastal ports of China. In this paper, we examine the potential loss of transshipment traffic in Hong Kong due to cabotage relaxation. Via a transshipment model and based on secondary data, we are able to derive a potential loss to Hong Kong’s throughput, on the order of 14%. This effect is not unique to Hong Kong: in general, in other parts of the world, there are also maritime hubs located near the coastal ports of other countries, and the effects of cabotage relaxation are similar. From a regional collaboration perspective, such as that of the Belt and Road Initiative, it is essential for different governments to review their cabotage policies together.

Keywords

Cabotage Policy China maritime ports Transshipment Logistics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Part of this paper’s findings was previously presented in a policy report written by Collin WH Wong, Eugene Wong, Yue Wang, Daniel Y. Mo and Lawrence C. Leung, entitled “Impact of Cabotage Relaxation and PRD Competition to Hong Kong’s Maritime Logistics Industry”, Hang Seng Management College, 2016. The authors hereby declare that they themselves retain the copyright. They are moreover thankful to the editor and two anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments and suggestions have led to a large improvement of the paper.

References

  1. Carroll, R. 2015. The US shipping industry is putting a multimillion dollar squeeze on Puerto Rico. Reuters. https://www.businessinsider.com/r-us-shippers-push-back-in-battle-over-puerto-rico-import-costs-2015-7.
  2. Cavana, R.Y. 2004. A qualitative analysis of reintroducing cabotage onto New Zealand’s coasts. Maritime Policy & Management 31 (3): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Census and Statistics Department. 2016. Hong Kong monthly digest of statistics. http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B10100022016MM03B0100.pdf.
  4. Census and Statistics Department. 2017. Hong Kong shipping statistics. http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp130.jsp?productCode=B1020008.
  5. Chambers, S. 2015. Maersk willing to invest billions in Indonesia if cabotage laws change. https://splash247.com/maersk-willing-to-invest-billions-in-indonesia-if-cabotage-laws-change/.
  6. China Ports Yearbook. 2017. Domestic vessels throughput. http://tongji.cnki.net/overseas/engnavi/HomePage.aspx?id=N2015110059&name=YZGAW&floor=1.
  7. Cochrane, R.A. 2008. The effects of market differences on the throughput of large container terminals with similar levels of efficiency. Maritime Economics & Logistics 10 (1–2): 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cullinane, K., W.T. Fei, and S. Cullinane. 2004. Container terminal development in Mainland China and its impact on the competitiveness of the port of Hong Kong. Transport Reviews 24 (1): 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Darwin, G. 2014. Removing Cabotage Law will result in jobs losses, says RoRo operator. InterAksyon.Google Scholar
  10. Development Bureau. 2017. Task force on land supply: Meeting Paper No. 09/2017. https://www.devb.gov.hk/filemanager/en/content_1054/Paper_09_2017.pdf.
  11. Escobar P. 2018. Marco Polo in reverse: How Italy fits in the New Silk Roads. http://www.atimes.com/article/marco-polo-reverse-italy-fits-new-silk-roads/.
  12. European Commission. 2014. Maritime transport: Commission clarifies EU rules on cabotage and reports on developments in this sector. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/maritime/news/cabotage_en.
  13. Flitsch, V., N. Herz, J. Wolff, and A.J. Baird. 2014. Maritime policy in the North Sea region: Application of the cluster approach. Maritime Economics & Logistics 16 (4): 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giannopoulos, G.A., and G. Aifandopoulou-Klimis. 2004. Inland maritime transport in Greece after the lifting of the cabotage and full liberalization: A review. Part 1: The situation ‘before’ and expected impacts. Transport Reviews 24 (4): 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grey, E. 2016. Australia’s great loss: The end of maritime cabotage? Ship-technology.com. http://www.ship-technology.com/features/featureaustralias-great-loss-the-end-of-maritime-cabotage-4715738/.
  16. Guo, J.L., G.S. Liang, K.D. Ye, and Y. Wu. 2007a. Impact of special shipping across the Taiwan Straits on the employment of Taiwanese ship officers. Maritime Policy & Management 34 (1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hayuth, Y., and D.K. Fleming. 1994. Concepts of strategic commercial location: The case of container ports. Maritime Policy and Management 21 (3): 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill, D.P., T.J. Scrase, and A. Wells. 2008. Privatisation and labour relations in Asian ports: The case of Port Klang, Malaysia, 94–109. Port Privatisation: The Asia-Pacific Experience.Google Scholar
  19. Igbokwe, M. 2001. Advocacy paper for the promulgation of a Nigerian maritime cabotage law. http://www.mikeigbokwe.com.
  20. International Shipping News. 2015. China-owned ships: a rapid rise to become one of the world’s largest fleets. http://www.hellenicshippingnews.com/china-owned-ships-fleet-expansion-accelerates/.
  21. JOC. 2018. India scraps cabotage rule, opens domestic freight to foreign ocean carriers. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/maritime-news/container-lines/india-scraps-cabotage-rule-opens-domestic-freight-foreign-ocean-carriers_20180523.html.
  22. Jones, W.L. 1921. The Merchant Marine Act of 1920. Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science in the City of New York, Vol. 9, No. 2, American Foreign Trade Relations (Feb., 1921), pp. 89–98.Google Scholar
  23. Knowler, G. 2015. Foreign carriers keep pressure on China to relax Cabotage. The Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/port-news/foreign-carriers-keep-pressure-china-relax-cabotage_20150719.html.
  24. Lau, Y.Y., and A.K. Ng. 2017. An evaluation of mid-stream operation in Hong Kong. Maritime Business Review 2 (4): 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Law Business Research. 2016. The Shipping Law Review—Edition 3 Japan. http://thelawreviews.co.uk/edition/the-shipping-law-review-edition-3/1136090/japan.
  26. Lee, S.W., D.W. Song, and C. Ducruet. 2008. A tale of Asia’s world ports: The spatial evolution in global hub port cities. Geoforum 39 (1): 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, K. and Ingram, CWM. 2002. Maritime law and policy in China, 19–20. Great Britain: Cavendish Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  28. Llanto, G.M., and A.M. Navarro. 2014. Relaxing the cabotage restrictions in maritime transport. http://dirp3.pids.gov.ph/webportal/CDN/PUBLICATIONS/pidspn1403.pdf.
  29. Lorenzo, E. 1998. The domestic shipping industry of the Philippines: A situation report. Maritime Industry Authority (unpublished report).Google Scholar
  30. Malakooti, B. 2013. Operations and production systems with multiple objectives, 532–535. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Marine Department HKSAR 2017. Ranking of container ports of the world. http://www.mardep.gov.hk/en/publication/pdf/portstat_2_y_b5.pdf.
  32. Ministry of Commerce People’s Republic of China. 1992. Maritime Code of the People’s Republic of China. http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/aarticle/lawsdata/chineselaw/200211/20021100050726.html.
  33. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. 2013. 交通运输部关于在上海试行中资非五星旗国际航行船舶沿海捎带的公告. http://www.chinacourt.org/law/detail/2013/09/id/146936.shtml.
  34. National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC). 2015. Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. NDRC, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, First Edition. 2015. http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html.
  35. Nina, D. 2016. Puerto Rico and the United States under the cabotage laws: A breach to the World Trade Organization’s member agreement? In Forum Empresarial, vol. 21(2).Google Scholar
  36. Offshore Support Journal. 2016. Utilisation heads south but Indonesia offers glimmer of hope. http://www.osjonline.com/news/view,utilisation-heads-south-but-indonesia-offers-glimmer-of-hope_44985.htm.
  37. Reynolds, Z. 2015. Proposed law would shake up Australia cabotage industry. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/maritime-news/container-lines/proposed-law-would-shake-australia-cabotage-industry_20150918.html.
  38. S&P Global Platts. 2016. The US’ Jones Act gets a new fight and a new argument. S&P Global Platts. http://blogs.platts.com/2016/03/31/jones-act-new-fight-new-argument/.
  39. Santos, R.A. delos. 2015. The Philippine cabotage regime: A level playing. https://www.pwc.com/ph/en/taxwise-or-otherwise/2015/philippine-cabotage-regime.html.
  40. Sexton, D. 2018. IPA reports stirs cabotage debate. Daily Cargo News. https://www.thedcn.com.au/ipa-reports-stirs-cabotage-debate/.
  41. Simbolon & Partners Law Firm. 2017. The Implementation of cabotage principle in Indonesia. https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=19607.
  42. SISI. 2016. Evaluation on the policy of maritime cabotage. Shanghai International Shipping Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Statista. 2017. Number of ships in the world merchant fleet as of January 1, 2016, by type. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264024/number-of-merchant-ships-worldwide-by-type/.
  44. The Economist. 2017. China’s expanding investment in global ports. The Economist Intelligence unit. http://country.eiu.com/article.aspx?articleid=965980480 &Country=Pakistan&topic=Economy&subtopic=Regional+developments&subsubtopic=Investment.
  45. The Port of Shenzhen (CNSZX). 2017. China, statistics & freight shipping details. https://www.freightos.com/port-of-shenzhen-china-freight-shipping-routes-information/.
  46. United Nations. 2016. Review of maritime transport. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/rmt2016_en.pdf.
  47. United Nations. 2017. Rethinking Maritime Caborage for Improved Connectivity. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Transport and Trade Facilitiation Series No. 9.Google Scholar
  48. Xinhuanet. 2017. 深圳港前三季度集装箱吞吐量同期增长 5.59%. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-10/14/c_1121803001.htm.
  49. Yee G., and N.K. Din. 2015. Cabotage and its impact in Indonesia. https://www.clydeco.com/insight/article/cabotage-and-its-impact-in-indonesia.
  50. Zheng, J., Q. Meng, and Z. Sun. 2014. Impact analysis of maritime cabotage legislations on liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design. European Journal of Operational Research 234 (3): 874–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Supply Chain and Information Management, School of Decision SciencesHang Seng Management CollegeShatinHong Kong

Personalised recommendations