Understanding price elasticity for airline ancillary services

  • Shuai ShaoEmail author
  • Göran Kauermann
Research Article


Recently, the general trend in the airline industry has been to generate ancillary revenue by offering additional services. Instead of completely separating ancillary services from tickets as optional components, most of the traditional airlines offer the so-called branded fares which bundle some of the ancillary components to an inclusive fare preventing a possible negative impact on the customers’ perception and brand image (mixed bundling). For instance, seat reservation and baggage transportation are often already included in the default fare. In this study, we analyse data to evaluate different bundle-pricing policies within the mixed bundling context. We use statistical regression methods to infer individual behaviour by analysing aggregated data on market level from a major European airline. We tackle the question of how to optimally price bundled fares. With the General Data Protection Regulation in place today, such high-level models which only require aggregated market data and no individual personal data are becoming more relevant for business analytics. We demonstrate how aggregate data still allow to investigate individual behaviour and our data analysis reveals the existence and variability of price elasticity. The results can help companies to segment their markets based on price elasticity and optimise their ancillary offerings accordingly.


Ancillary revenue Branded fares Bundle pricing Mixed bundling Price elasticity Pricing policy evaluation 



  1. Achen, C.H., and W.P. Shively. 1995. Cross-Level Inference. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, W.J., and J.L. Yellen. 1976. Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 90 (3): 475–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blattberg, R.C., and S.A. Neslin. 1990. Sales Promotion: Concepts, Methods and Strategies, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Bockelie, A., and P. Belobaba. 2017. Incorporating Ancillary Services in Airline Passenger Choice Models. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 16 (6): 553–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Box, G.E.P., and N.R. Draper. 1987. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Brodersen, K.H., F. Gallusser, J. Koehler, N. Remy, and S.L. Scott. 2015. Inferring Causal Impact Using Bayesian Structural Time-series Models. Annals of Applied Statistics 9 (1): 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahrmeir, L., and G. Tutz. 2001. Multivariate Statistical Modelling Based on Generalized Linear Models. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gallego, G., and C. Stefanescu. 2012. Services engineering: Design and pricing of service features. In The Oxford Handbook of Pricing Management, ed. Ö. Özer and R. Phillips, 713–737. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. King, G. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Klima, A., P.W. Thurner, C. Molnar, T. Schlesinger, and H. Kuchenhoff. 2016. Estimation of Voter Transitions Based on Ecological Inference: An Empirical Assessment of Different Approaches. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis 100 (2): 133–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Montgomery, D.C. 2012. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  14. Ratliff, R., and G. Gallego. 2013. Estimating Sales and Profitability Impacts of Airline Brandedfares Product Design and Pricing Decisions Using Customer Choice Models. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management 12 (6): 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Steppe, R. 2017. Online Price Discrimination and Personal Data: A General Data Protection Regulation Perspective. Computer Law and Security Review 33 (6): 768–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tikkinen-Piri, C., A. Rohunen, and J. Markkula. 2018. EU General Data Protection Regulation: Changes and Implications for Personal Data Collecting Companies. Computer Law and Security Review 34 (1): 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Train, K.E. 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Varian, H.R. 2016. Causal Inference in Economics and Marketing. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (27): 7310–7315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Venkatesh, R., and V. Mahajan. 2009. The Design and Pricing of Bundles: A Review of Normative Guidelines and Practical Approaches. In Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing, ed. V.R. Rao, 232–257. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wakefield, J. 2004. Ecological Inference for 2 ×2 tables (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 167 (3): 385–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yee, T.W. 2010. The VGAM Package for Categorical Data Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 32 (10): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsLMU MünchenMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations