Advertisement

Journal of Marketing Analytics

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 84–93 | Cite as

Review of a proposed methodology for bibliometric and visualization analyses for organizations: application to the collaboration economy

  • Myriam ErtzEmail author
  • Sébastien Leblanc-Proulx
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the bibliometric and visualization method applied to a dataset of 729 documents published in the collaborative economy research field. Four steps are described in details: (1) the delimitation of the field of study; (2) the selection of databases, keywords, and search criteria; (3) the extraction, cleaning, and formatting; and finally (4) the co-citation analysis and visualization. The method validation section shows the results obtained by applying our methodological procedure to an author network analysis as well as a source title network analysis. This study is unique which presents a co-citation analysis coupled with a network visualization applied to the rapidly growing research area of the collaborative economy as a whole and not only of the collaborative tourism and hospitality research, as has been previously. The originality of this method lies firstly in the fact that the data were extracted from two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) instead of one as is commonly done in analytic studies. Secondly, VOSviewer was our main analytical tool performing the co-citation analysis and the network visualizations.

Keywords

Bibliometrics Content analysis Network analysis Visualization method Cluster analysis Co-citation analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Vincent Morin, head of the department of economics and social sciences, at Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQÀC), for his valuable support and unaltered trust throughout the conduct of this study. We would also like to express our gratitude to Érick Chamberland, professor at the department of economics and social sciences, at Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQÀC) for introducing us to the field of bibliometric analysis and his initiation of the project.

References

  1. Agarwal, A., D. Durairajanayagam, S. Tatagari, S.C. Esteves, A. Harlev, R. Henkel, S. Roychoudhury, S. Homa, N.G. Puchalt, R. Ramasamy, A. Majzoub, K.D. Ly, E. Tvrda, M. Assidi, K. Kesari, R. Sharma, S. Banihani, E. Ko, M. Abu-Elmagd, J. Gosalvez, and A. Bashiri. 2016. Bibliometrics: Tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian Journal of Andrology.  https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682x.171582.Google Scholar
  2. Boyack, K.W., and R. Klavans. 2010. Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (12): 2389–2404.Google Scholar
  3. Cheng, M. 2016. Sharing economy: A review and agenda for future research. International Journal of Hospitality Management 57: 60–70.Google Scholar
  4. De Bellis, N. 2009. Bibliometrics and citation analysis: From the Science citation index to cybermetrics. Toronto: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  5. Diodato, V. 1994. Dictionary of bibliometrics. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ertz, M., F. Durif, and M. Arcand. 2016. Collaborative consumption: Conceptual snapshot at a buzzword. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education 19 (2): 1–23.Google Scholar
  7. Ertz, M., and S. Leblanc-Proulx. 2018. Sustainability in the collaborative economy: A bibliometric analysis reveals emerging interest. Journal of Cleaner Production 196: 1073–1085.Google Scholar
  8. Fahimnia, B., J. Sarkis, and H. Davarzani. 2015. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 162: 101–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003.Google Scholar
  9. Fidel, R. 1991. Controlled vocabulary or free-text searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 (7): 501–514.Google Scholar
  10. García-Lillo, F., E. Claver-Cortés, M. Úbeda-García, B. Marco-Lajara, and P.C. Zaragoza-Sáez. 2018. Mapping the “intellectual structure” of research on human resources in the “tourism and hospitality management scientific domain” Reviewing the field and shedding light on future directions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30 (3): 1741–1768.Google Scholar
  11. Haustein, S., and A. Larivière. 2015. The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: Possibilities, limitations and adverse effects. In Incentives and performance, ed. I. Welpe, J. Wollersheim, S. Ringelhan, and M. Osterloh, 121–139. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Marshakova, I. V. (1973). A system of document connections based on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI, 6, 3–8. 5, 33.Google Scholar
  13. McCain, K.W. 1990. Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41 (6): 433–443.Google Scholar
  14. Meho, L.I., and C.R. Sugimoto. 2007. Mapping the intellectual impact of library and information science research through citations: A tale of two databases–Scopus and Web of Science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 44 (1): 1–7.Google Scholar
  15. Mongeon, P., and A. Paul-Hus. 2016. The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics 106: 213–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.Google Scholar
  16. Mora, L., R. Bolici, and M. Deakin. 2017. The first two decades of smart-city research: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Urban Technology 24: 3–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1285123.Google Scholar
  17. Pampel, F.C. 2004. Exploratory data analysis, encyclopedia of social science research methods. London: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  18. Perianes-Rodriguez, A., L. Waltman, and N.J. van Eck. 2016. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics 10: 1178–1195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.10.006.Google Scholar
  19. Rogers, R., and R. Botsman. 2010. What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. New York: HarperBusiness.Google Scholar
  20. Savoy, J. 2005. Bibliographic database access using free-text and controlled vocabulary: An evaluation. Information Processing and Management 41: 873–890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.01.004.Google Scholar
  21. Shaw, W.M. 1985. Critical thresholds in co-citation graphs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 36 (1): 38–43.Google Scholar
  22. Small, H. 1973. Cocitation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24: 265–269.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406.Google Scholar
  23. Small, H. 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (9): 799–813.Google Scholar
  24. Small, H. 2009. Critical thresholds for co-citation clusters and emergence of the giant component. Journal of Informetrics 3: 332–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.05.001.Google Scholar
  25. Sundararajan, A. 2016. The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Van Eck, N.J., and L. Waltman. 2007. VOS: A new method for visualizing similarities between objects. Advances in Data Analysis, 299–306. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Van Eck, N.J., L. Waltman, R. Dekker, and J. Van Den Berg. 2010. A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61: 2405–2416.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421.Google Scholar
  28. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L, Van den Berg J. (2005) A novel algorithm for visualizing concept associations. In 6th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA’05) (pp. 405–409). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  29. White, H.D., and B.C. Griffith. 1981. Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 (3): 163–171.Google Scholar
  30. White, H.D., and K.W. McCain. 1998. Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science: 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (4): 327–355.Google Scholar
  31. Yong-Hak, J. 2013. Web of science. Philadelphia: Thomson Reuters.Google Scholar
  32. Zhao, D., and A. Strotmann. 2015. Analysis and visualization of citation networks. San Rafael: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Limited 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LaboNFCUniversité du Québec à ChicoutimiChicoutimiCanada

Personalised recommendations