Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 54, Issue 1, pp 124–144 | Cite as

Young deputies in the European Parliament: a starkly underrepresented age group

  • Daniel StockemerEmail author
  • Aksel Sundström
Original Article
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

The underrepresentation of youths in legislatures is a rarely studied topic in comparative research. This article examines the representation of age groups in the European Parliament, an assembly that allows researchers to observe variation in youths’ presence across institutional contexts of countries. Utilizing a register of the age of all individual Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) for the years 1979–2014, we do two things: (1) offer a picture of the representation of young politicians over time and provide some explanations for youth’s underrepresentation in the EP, and (2) investigate national differences in the representation of young MEPs. Analyzing a host of explanatory variables, our analyses highlight that lowering the legal age to run for office benefits young individuals. In contrast, our analysis suggests that countries, which are richer and have younger populations, tend to send older delegations to Brussels and Strasbourg.

Keywords

Youths Representation European Parliament 

References

  1. Bernauer, J., N. Giger, and J. Rosset. 2015. Mind the gap: do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich? International Political Science Review 36 (1): 78–98.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatti, Y., and K.M. Hansen. 2012. The effect of generation and age on turnout to the European Parliament—how turnout will continue to decline in the future. Electoral Studies 31 (2): 262–272.Google Scholar
  3. Bhatti, Y., K.M. Hansen, and H. Wass. 2012. The relationship between age and turnout: a roller-coaster ride. Electoral Studies 31 (3): 588–593.Google Scholar
  4. Blondel, J. 1995. Comparative government: an introduction. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  5. Carnes, N. 2013. White-collar government: the hidden role of class in economic policy making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chiva, C. 2014. Gender, European integration and candidate recruitment: the European Parliament elections in the new EU member states. Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 458–494.Google Scholar
  7. Diermeier, D., and A. Merlo. 2000. Government turnover in parliamentary democracies. Journal of Economic Theory 94 (1): 46–79.Google Scholar
  8. Draper, N.R., and H. Smith. 2014. Applied regression analysis, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Dryzek, J.S. 1996. Political inclusion and the dynamics of democratization. The American Political Science Review 90 (3): 475–487.Google Scholar
  10. Erikson, R., and R. Titiunik. 2015. Using regression discontinuity to uncover the personal incumbency advantage. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (1): 101–119.Google Scholar
  11. Esser, F. 2003. Comparing young voters’ political engagement in the United States and Europe. The American Behavioral Scientist 50 (9): 1195–1213.Google Scholar
  12. European Parliament. 2014. Turnout by country in (%). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2014-results/en/turnout.html.
  13. European Parliament. 2016a. The european parliament fact sheet: electoral procedures. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ftu/pdf/en/FTU_1.3.4.pdf.
  14. European Parliament. 2016b. Shaping Europe: 50 ideas for a better future. The EYE report 2016. Strasbourg: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  15. European Youth Forum. 2010. Participatory youth organizations in Europe: core arguments for lowering the electoral age to 16. Youth Policy 25. http://bit.ly/whyvoteat16. Accessed 25 Sep 2010.
  16. Eurostat. 2016. Population by age group % of total population. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/refreshTableAction.do?tab=table&plugin=1&pcode=tps00010&language=en. Accessed 19 Nov 2016.
  17. Fawcett, C. 2002. Latin American youth in transition: a policy paper on youth unemployment in Latin America and the Caribbean. Labor markets policy briefs series. Inter-American development bank.Google Scholar
  18. Flanagan, C., A. Finlay, L. Gallay, and T. Kim. 2012. Political incorporation and the protracted transition to adulthood: the need for new institutional inventions. Parliamentary Affairs 65 (1): 29–46.Google Scholar
  19. Fortin-Rittberger, J., and B. Rittberger. 2014. Do electoral rules matter? Explaining national differences in women’s representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 15: 496–520.Google Scholar
  20. Fortin-Rittberger, J., and B. Rittberger. 2015. Nominating women for Europe: exploring the role of political parties’ recruitment procedures for European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research 54 (4): 767–783.Google Scholar
  21. Gelman, A., and G. King. 1990. Estimating incumbency advantage without bias. American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1142–1164.Google Scholar
  22. Gidengil, E., A. Blais, N. Nevitte, and R. Nadeau. 2003. Turned off or tuned out? Youth participation in politics. Electoral Insight 5 (2): 9–14.Google Scholar
  23. Henn, M., and N. Foard. 2012. Young people, political participation and trust in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 65 (1): 47–67.Google Scholar
  24. Henn, M., and N. Foard. 2014. Social differentiation in young people’s political participation: the impact of social and educational factors on youth political engagement in Britain. Journal of Youth Studies 17 (3): 360–380.Google Scholar
  25. Hobolt, S.B., J.J. Spoon, and J. Tilley. 2008. A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 93–115.Google Scholar
  26. Htun, M.N. 2005. Women, political parties and electoral systems in Latin America. In Women in parliament: beyond numbers, ed. J. Ballington, and A. Karam. Stockholm: International IDEA.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, M. 2011. Intersectionality, quotas, and minority women’s political representation worldwide. American Political Science Review 105 (3): 604–620.Google Scholar
  28. Hughes, M. 2013. The intersection of gender and minority status in national legislatures: the minority women legislative index. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (4): 489–516.Google Scholar
  29. Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2014. Youth participation in national parliaments. IPU. ISBN 078-92-9142-619-5.Google Scholar
  32. Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). 2017. Compulsory voting. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/voter-turnout/compulsory-voting.
  33. Jesuit, D.K., P.R. Paradowski, and V.A. Mahler. 2009. Electoral support for extreme right-wing parties: a sub-national analysis of western European elections. Electoral Studies 28 (2): 279–290.Google Scholar
  34. Joshi, D.K. 2013. The representation of younger age cohorts in Asian Parliaments: do electoral systems make a difference? Representation 49 (1): 1–16.Google Scholar
  35. Joshi, D.K. 2015. The inclusion of excluded majorities in south asian parliaments: women, youth, and the working class. Journal of Asian and African Studies 50 (2): 223–238.Google Scholar
  36. Joshi, D., and M. Och. 2014. Talking about my generation and class? Unpacking the descriptive representation of women in Asian parliaments. Women’s Studies International Forum 47 (1): 168–179.Google Scholar
  37. Kantola, J. 2010. Gender and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Kenny, M. 2013. Gender and political recruitment: theorizing institutional change. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Kissau, K., G. Lutz, and J. Rosset. 2012. Unequal representation of age groups in Switzerland. Representation 48 (1): 63–81.Google Scholar
  40. Kmenta, J. 1990. Elements of econometrics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  41. Konzelmann, L., C. Wagner, and H. Rattinger. 2012. Turnout in Germany in the course of time: life cycle and cohort effects on electoral turnout from 1953 to 2049. Electoral Studies 31 (2): 250–261.Google Scholar
  42. Krabbe, W.R. 2013. Parteijugend in Deutschland: junge union, jungsozialisten und jungdemokraten 1945–1980. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. League of Young Voters and International IDEA. 2014. EU political parties ignoring younger people. http://www.idea.int/elections/upload/LYV-press-release.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2014.
  44. Lühiste, M., and M. Kenny. 2016. Pathways to power: women’s representation in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research 55: 626–641.Google Scholar
  45. Mansbridge, J. 1999. Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? a contingent ‘yes’. Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.Google Scholar
  46. Marsh, M., and P. Norris. 1997. Political representation in the European Parliament. European Journal of Political Research 32: 153–164.Google Scholar
  47. Matland, R.E. 2005. Enhancing Women’s Political Participation: legislative recruitment and electoral systems. In Women in parliament: beyond numbers, ed. J. Balligton, and A. Karam. Stockholm: IDEA International.Google Scholar
  48. McEvoy, C. 2016. Does the descriptive representation of women matter? A comparison of gendered differences in political attitudes between voters and representatives in the European Parliament. Politics and Gender 12: 1–27.Google Scholar
  49. Melo, D.F., and D. Stockemer. 2014. Age and political participation in Germany, France and the UK: a comparative analysis. Comparative European Politics 12 (1): 33–53.Google Scholar
  50. Meserve, S.A., D. Pemstein, and W.T. Bernhard. 2009. Political ambition and legislative behavior in the European Parliament. The Journal of Politics 71 (3): 1015–1032.Google Scholar
  51. Murray, R. 2008. The power of sex and incumbency: a longitudinal study of electoral performance in France. Party Politics 14 (5): 539–554.Google Scholar
  52. Narud, H.M., and V. Henry. 2000. Does social background matter. In Beyond Westminster and congress: The nordic experience, 83–106. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Norris, P. 2004. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2001. Cultural obstacles to equal representation. Journal of Democracy 12 (3): 126–140.Google Scholar
  55. Phillips, A. 1995. The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Prainsack, I.E., and A. Vodanović. 2013. Vital for democracy, but do they realise it? Europe’s youth and the 2014 elections. European View 12 (1): 85.Google Scholar
  57. Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. Nine second-order national elections—a conceptual frame-work for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44.Google Scholar
  58. Reynolds, A. 2010. Designing democracy in a dangerous world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rolandsen Augustin, L. 2012. (Re)defining women’s interests? Political struggles over women’s collective representation in the context of the European Parliament. European Journal of Women’s Studies 19 (1): 23–40.Google Scholar
  60. Rosen, J. 2017. Gender quotas for women in national politics: a comparative analysis across development thresholds. Social Science Research, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  61. Ruedin, D. 2009. Ethnic group representation in a cross-national comparison. The Journal of Legislative Studies 15 (4): 335–354.Google Scholar
  62. Sloam, J. 2016. Diversity and voice: the political participation of young people in the European Union. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18 (3): 521–537.Google Scholar
  63. Stockemer, D. and A. Sundström. 2018. Age representation in parliaments: can institutions pave way for the young? European Political Science Review, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  64. Tremmel, J., A. Mason, P. Haakenstad, and G.I. Dimitrijoski (eds.). 2015. Youth quotas and other efficient forms of youth participation in ageing societies. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  65. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (UN-DESA). 2015. World population prospects: the 2015 revision. https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/.
  66. Webb, P., and S. Childs. 2012. Gender politics and conservatism: the view from the British Conservative Party grassroots. Government and Opposition 47 (1): 21–48.Google Scholar
  67. Wooldridge, J.M. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  68. World Bank. 2016. World development indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.
  69. Wängnerud, L. 2009. Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 51–69.Google Scholar
  70. Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Young, I.M. 1992. Social groups in associative democracy. Politics and Society 20 (4): 529–534.Google Scholar
  72. Zeglovits, E. 2013. Voting at 16? Youth suffrage is up for debate. European View 12 (2): 249–254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations